Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Conceptus

Zeitschrift für Philosophie

Online
ISSN
2196-9523
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Wittgenstein’s Thought-Experiments

Nenad Miščević
Published Online: 2017-01-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cpt-2016-0002

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations feature three big thought-experiments: the Builders, the Rule-following argument, and the Private language argument. The experiments in question are macro-thought-experiments, which are rare in theoretical philosophy. The paper distinguishes eight such stages in/of these experiments, characterizes them briefly, and offers an explicit understanding of the stages, their mutual relations and commonalities with other thought-experiments in philosophy. This is proposed as a step towards systematically placing Wittgenstein’s work in the wider context of actual philosophical methodology and of present-day sharp debates about armchair thinking in the field.

One immediate result of comparing Wittgenstein’s thought-experiments with their counterparts in the analytic mainstream reveals an interesting trait: they are merely suggestive, in the sense that the theses they point to are rarely put forward explicitly, and even more rarely argued for in the manner that is nowadays fashionable in the mainstream. The paper briefly points to the difference by using the examples of Saul Kripke’s (1982) presentation of Rule-following and the unorthodox reading of the Builders by Charles Travis (1989), to illustrate the potential of the merely suggestive material for re-interpretation by a creative thinker.

Keywords: Wittgenstein; Philosophical Investigations; Rule-following; language-acquisition; though-experiments

Bibliography

  • Baker, Gordon (1981): “Following Wittgenstein: Some Signposts for Philosophical Investigations §§ 143–242”. In: Holtzman, Stephen H./Christopher M. Leich (Eds.): Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge, pp. 31–71. Google Scholar

  • Bromand, Joachim (2012): “Wittgenstein über Gedankenexperimente”. In: Jäger, Christoph/Winfried Löffler (Eds.): Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreement. Proceedings of the 34th Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg. Frankfurt, M. [i.e.] Heusenstamm: Ontos, pp. 507–522. Google Scholar

  • Brown, James Robert/Yiftah Fehige (2011): “Thought experiments”. In: Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Google Scholar

  • Candlish, Steward/George Wrisley (2012): “The Private Language”. In: Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Google Scholar

  • Cohen, Martin (2005): Wittgenstein’s beetle and other classical thought experiments. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Conant, James (2007): “Mild Mono-Wittgensteinianism”. In: Crary, Alice (Ed.): Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press. Google Scholar

  • Diamond, Cora (2002): “What if x isn't the number of sheep? Wittgenstein and Thought-Experiments in Ethics”. In: Philosophical Papers 31 (3), pp. 227–250. Google Scholar

  • Goldfarb, Warren (2007): “I Want You to Bring me a Slab”. In: Williams, Meredith (Ed.): Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: Critical Essays. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Grice, Paul (1989): Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hintikka, Merrill B./Jaakko Hintikka (1986): Investigating Wittgenstein. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Hintikka, Merrill B./Jaakko Hintikka (2007): “Language-games in Wittgenstein’s Later Thought”. In: Williams, Meredith (Ed.): Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: Critical Essays. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, pp. 33–59. Google Scholar

  • Holtzman, Steven H./Christopher M. Leich (eds.) (1981): Wittgenstein: To follow a rule. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • Kripke, Saul A. (1982): Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

  • McGinn, Marie (1997): Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. London: Taylor & Francis, p. 42. Google Scholar

  • Miščević, Nenad (2013): “Political Thought Experiments from Plato to Rawls”. In: Frappier, Mélanie/Letitia Meynell/James Robert Brown (Eds.): Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar

  • Peach, Andrew J. (2004): “The Origins of Wittgenstein’s Imaginary Scenarios: Something Old, Something New”. In: Philosophical Investigations 27:4, pp. 299–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Travis, Charles (1989): The Uses Of Sense: Wittgenstein's Philosophy Of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Travis, Charles (2008): Occasion-Sensitivity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958[[1953]]): Philosophical Investigations. 2nd edition. Transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1956): Remarks on the Foundation of Mathematics. Transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1964[1958]): Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”. Generally Known as the Blue and Brown Books. Preface by Rush Rhees. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1975): Philosophical Remarks. Ed. R. Rhees, tr. R. Hargreaves and R. White. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1974b[1921]): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Tr. D.F. Pears and B. McGuinness. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-01-03

Published in Print: 2017-01-01


Citation Information: Conceptus, Volume 42, Issue 101-102, Pages 20–40, ISSN (Online) 2196-9523, ISSN (Print) 0010-5155, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cpt-2016-0002.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in