Cervical pregnancies remain a rare implantation disorder. Cervico-isthmic pregnancies are more common as well as more lethal, because with advancing gestational age the maternal risk for massive hemorrhage increases. Our case illustrates four important points.
Owing to certain similarities cervico-isthmic pregnancies with cervical placenta can be mistaken for major placenta previa. In major placenta previa the placental implantation site is within the uterine cavum, whereas cervico-isthmic pregnancies with cervical placenta (like in our case) remain in the lower uterine segment and the cervical region. Although in placenta previa the cervical length is not affected, in cervico-isthmic pregnancies a distended cervical canal is visualized [1], which can be confused with cervical shortening.
Most cases with cervical pregnancy abort spontaneously or are terminated in early gestational age. However, in our single case experience expectant management with third trimester delivery was possible even with the shortened cervix. This is because the shortened cervix was more likely to be the result of displacement of cervical tissue than a sign of imminent premature delivery.
Implantation disorders of the placenta into the uterine wall result in placenta accreta, increta, and percreta. Probable risk factors include previous uterine surgery (i.e., curettage, Asherman’s syndrome, previous cesarean delivery) as well as in vitro fertilization. If placental growth exceeds uterine boundaries, adjacent organs (bladder, ureters, and bowel) may be damaged which might cause hemorrhage leading to the requirement of a cesarean hysterectomy [4].
In early ultrasound scans, clinical findings include visualization of products of conception in a dilated cervix. The uterus is usually of normal size. Cervical implantation in both true cervical and cervico-isthmic pregnancies may be confused with the first stage of a spontaneous abortion. Furthermore, it is important to distinguish between a true cervical pregnancy and a cervico-isthmic pregnancy so that maternal risks such as uterine rupture, hemorrhage, and hysterectomy are reduced.
From our single case experience cervico-isthmic pregnancies can be continued to the third trimester after counseling. It is important that the risk of preterm delivery as well as severe hemorrhage and organ loss is discussed with the patient.
Alternative strategies to prevent postpartum hemorrhage that have been published include uterine artery embolizations as well as ligation of the uterine or internal iliac arteries [3].
In conclusion, expectant management can be offered to patients with a cervico-isthmic pregnancy. The risk of preterm delivery for these patients is difficult to assess. In our case, the timing of delivery was dependent on the incidence of vaginal bleeding.
Furthermore, our case underlines the importance of interdisciplinary peripartum management as well as necessary skills of the delivering surgeon to control severe hemorrhage which possibly requires hysterectomy.
Comments (0)