Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2354-0036
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Notes on Creative Potential and Its Measurement1

Maciej Karwowski
  • Corresponding author
  • Academy of Special Education, Poland
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0001

Abstract

The discussion raised by the Glăveanu target paper (Glăveanu, 2014) continues in the second issue of “Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications” (CTRA). In this editorial I focus on two elements shared by commentators whose articles are presented in this issue, namely: creative potential and its measurement. I start with the observation that potential is probably the most fuzzy and poorly defined construct in the creativity literature (and likely social science as a whole). As a result of different operationalizations of this category, its valid and reliable measurement is difficult – though not impossible – but, more importantly, several different theories of potential are being developed simultaneously. I focus mainly on critiques of the measurement of creative potential and show how recent developments in psychometrics make it more valid and reliable than critics tend to realize.

Keywords: Creativity measurement; Creative potential; Adaptive testing

Footnotes

  • 1This editorial is partially based on a keynote talk given at a congress of the Polish Society of Educational Assessment, Gdansk, 2014.

REFERENCES

  • Beaty, R. E. & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309-319.

  • Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1186-1197. [Crossref]

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447-457. [Crossref]

  • Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 342-349.

  • Ceci, S. J. (1990). On Intelligence … more or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Century Psychology Series.

  • Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., &Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82-88. [Crossref]

  • Dziedziewicz, D. & Karwowski, M. (2015). Development of children’s creative visual imagination: A theoretical model, measurement instrument and enhancement programs. Education 3-13; DOI:10.1080/03004279.2015.1020646. [Crossref]

  • Fink, A. & Benedek, M. (2012). EEG alpha power and creative ideation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 111-123. [Crossref]

  • Finke, R., Ward, T., & Smith, S. (1992). Creative cognition. Cambridge, MT: MIT Press.

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). The status of the social in creativity studies and the pitfalls of dichotomic thinking. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 102-119; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0016. [Crossref]

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69-81. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2012). Creativity and school grades: A case from Poland. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 198-208.

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers' ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “ be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454. [Crossref]

  • Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 59-74.

  • Hennessey, B. A. (2015). Comment on “ The Psychology of creativity: A critical reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 32-37; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0004. [Crossref]

  • Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–460. [Crossref]

  • Karwowski, M. (2005). Konstelacje zdolnosci. Typy inteligencji a kreatywnosc. Krakow: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.

  • Karwowski, M. (2007). Teachers’ nominations of students’ creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? Social Sciences, 2, 264-269.

  • Karwowski, M. (2008). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 1. Presentation of a new instrument to measure creative potential. New Educational Review, 1, 44-54.

  • Karwowski, M. (2008a). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 2. On validity of the TCI. New Educational Review, 2, 216-232.

  • Karwowski, M. (2009). Zglebianie kreatywnosci. Studia nad pomiarem poziomu i stylu tworczosci. Wydawnictwo APS.

  • Karwowski, M. (2010). Kreatywnosc – feeria rozumien, uwikłan, powodow. Teoretycznoempiryczna prolegomena. [W:] M. Karwowski, A. Gajda (red.). Kreatywnosc (nie tylko) w klasie szkolnej. Warszawa: APS.

  • Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask... But sometimes it hurts to believe. Predictors of Polish students’ creative self-efficacy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 154-164.

  • Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547-558.

  • Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.

  • Karwowski, M. & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or Artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25-33.

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E, & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215-232. [Crossref]

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Kujawski, J. (2000). O testach twoczosci. W: M. Partyka (red.), Modele opieki nad dzieckiem zdolnym. Warszawa: CMPPP MEN.

  • Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. [Crossref]

  • Metcalfe, J. & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246. [Crossref]

  • Necka, E. (1987). Proces tworczy i jego ograniczenia. Krakow: Impuls.

  • Necka, E. (2001). Psychologia tworczosci. Gdansk: GWP.

  • Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “ be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, in press.

  • Plucker, J.A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyzes of Torrance’s (1958 to Present) Longitudinal Data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114 [Crossref]

  • Plucker, J.A.& Runco, M.A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36–39. [Crossref]

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappa, 42, 305-310.

  • Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317-324. [Crossref]

  • Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal 11, 243–263. [Crossref]

  • Russ, S. W. & Wallace, C. E. (2013). Pretend play and creative processes. American Journal of Play, 6, 136-148.

  • Silvia, P. J.& Nusbaum, E. (2012). What's your major? College majors as markers of creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22, 31-44.

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M.& Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Creative motivation: Creative achievement predicts cardiac autonomic markers of effort during divergent thinking. Biological Psychology, 102, 30-37. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Asperson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “ little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183-188.

  • Vygotski, L. S. (1930/2004). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 1, 7–97.

  • Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., Cheng, C.-L., &Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Application of the Rasch Model to the measurement of creativity: The Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 62-71. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

About the article

Received: 2015-03-23

Revised: 2015-03-31

Accepted: 2015-04-03

Published Online: 2015-05-26

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


1This editorial is partially based on a keynote talk given at a congress of the Polish Society of Educational Assessment, Gdansk, 2014.


Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0001. Export Citation

© Maciej Karwowski. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in