Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2354-0036
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Notes on Creative Potential and Its Measurement1

Maciej Karwowski
Published Online: 2015-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0001

Abstract

The discussion raised by the Glăveanu target paper (Glăveanu, 2014) continues in the second issue of “Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications” (CTRA). In this editorial I focus on two elements shared by commentators whose articles are presented in this issue, namely: creative potential and its measurement. I start with the observation that potential is probably the most fuzzy and poorly defined construct in the creativity literature (and likely social science as a whole). As a result of different operationalizations of this category, its valid and reliable measurement is difficult – though not impossible – but, more importantly, several different theories of potential are being developed simultaneously. I focus mainly on critiques of the measurement of creative potential and show how recent developments in psychometrics make it more valid and reliable than critics tend to realize.

Keywords: Creativity measurement; Creative potential; Adaptive testing

REFERENCES

  • Beaty, R. E. & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309-319.Google Scholar

  • Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1186-1197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447-457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 342-349.Google Scholar

  • Ceci, S. J. (1990). On Intelligence … more or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Century Psychology Series.Google Scholar

  • Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., &Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82-88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dziedziewicz, D. & Karwowski, M. (2015). Development of children’s creative visual imagination: A theoretical model, measurement instrument and enhancement programs. Education 3-13; DOI:10.1080/03004279.2015.1020646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fink, A. & Benedek, M. (2012). EEG alpha power and creative ideation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 111-123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finke, R., Ward, T., & Smith, S. (1992). Creative cognition. Cambridge, MT: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). The status of the social in creativity studies and the pitfalls of dichotomic thinking. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 102-119; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69-81.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2012). Creativity and school grades: A case from Poland. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 198-208.Google Scholar

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers' ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “ be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 59-74.Google Scholar

  • Hennessey, B. A. (2015). Comment on “ The Psychology of creativity: A critical reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 32-37; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2005). Konstelacje zdolnosci. Typy inteligencji a kreatywnosc. Krakow: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2007). Teachers’ nominations of students’ creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? Social Sciences, 2, 264-269.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2008). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 1. Presentation of a new instrument to measure creative potential. New Educational Review, 1, 44-54.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2008a). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 2. On validity of the TCI. New Educational Review, 2, 216-232.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2009). Zglebianie kreatywnosci. Studia nad pomiarem poziomu i stylu tworczosci. Wydawnictwo APS.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2010). Kreatywnosc – feeria rozumien, uwikłan, powodow. Teoretycznoempiryczna prolegomena. [W:] M. Karwowski, A. Gajda (red.). Kreatywnosc (nie tylko) w klasie szkolnej. Warszawa: APS.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask... But sometimes it hurts to believe. Predictors of Polish students’ creative self-efficacy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 154-164.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547-558.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or Artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25-33.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E, & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215-232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kujawski, J. (2000). O testach twoczosci. W: M. Partyka (red.), Modele opieki nad dzieckiem zdolnym. Warszawa: CMPPP MEN.Google Scholar

  • Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Metcalfe, J. & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Necka, E. (1987). Proces tworczy i jego ograniczenia. Krakow: Impuls.Google Scholar

  • Necka, E. (2001). Psychologia tworczosci. Gdansk: GWP.Google Scholar

  • Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “ be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, in press.Google Scholar

  • Plucker, J.A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyzes of Torrance’s (1958 to Present) Longitudinal Data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plucker, J.A.& Runco, M.A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappa, 42, 305-310.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317-324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal 11, 243–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russ, S. W. & Wallace, C. E. (2013). Pretend play and creative processes. American Journal of Play, 6, 136-148.Google Scholar

  • Silvia, P. J.& Nusbaum, E. (2012). What's your major? College majors as markers of creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22, 31-44.Google Scholar

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M.& Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Creative motivation: Creative achievement predicts cardiac autonomic markers of effort during divergent thinking. Biological Psychology, 102, 30-37.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Asperson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “ little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183-188.Google Scholar

  • Vygotski, L. S. (1930/2004). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 1, 7–97.Google Scholar

  • Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., Cheng, C.-L., &Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Application of the Rasch Model to the measurement of creativity: The Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 62-71.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-03-23

Revised: 2015-03-31

Accepted: 2015-04-03

Published Online: 2015-05-26

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


1This editorial is partially based on a keynote talk given at a congress of the Polish Society of Educational Assessment, Gdansk, 2014.


Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0001.

Export Citation

© Maciej Karwowski. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Maciej Karwowski, Jacek Gralewski, and Grzegorz Szumski
Learning and Individual Differences, 2015, Volume 44, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in