Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A Commentary on the Social Perspective on Creativity

Mark A. Runco
Published Online: 2015-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0003


This commentary examines the social perspective on creativity, as presented in the featured article. There are several attractive aspects to the social perspective, but serious limitations as well, which are detailed in this commentary. The assumptions of the social perspective are also discussed. The most questionable of these assumes that social recognition and impact are inherent parts of creativity. The parsimonious alternative is to define creativity such that it includes only what is related to creativity per se and to recognize that social recognition may follow creation and is certainly extricable from it. A defence of this parsimonious view is presented. A brief discussion of possible crises in the field of creativity studies is also presented, with one suggestion being that the diverse approaches used in the field represent a kind of divergent thinking and as such represent progress, even though it is not linear. This commentary concludes with a discussion about creativity being vital for quality of life. That perspective differs dramatically from the product view of creativity which is often tied to a social perspective.

Keywords: Potential; Parsimony; Divergent thinking


  • Albert, R. S. (1995). Madison Avenue Comes to Academe. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 427-429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amabile, T. M. (1995). Attributions of Creativity: What Are the Consequences? Creativity Research Journal 8, 423-426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. (2010). What really motivates workers. Harvard Business Review, 88, 1, 44-45.Google Scholar

  • Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

  • Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121-130.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.Google Scholar

  • Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27-51.Google Scholar

  • Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311-366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kharkhurin, A. (2014). Creativity four-in-one: Four Criterion Construct of Creativity Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338–352.Google Scholar

  • Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Richards, R. (1991). A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 59–95.Google Scholar

  • Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 69-82). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • Rothenberg, A. (1999). Janusian processes. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 103-108). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children’s art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177-189.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377-390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (1999). Misjudgment of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 235-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (2005). Self-actualization. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human development (pp. 1132-1133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (2010). Creative thinking may be simultaneous as well as blind [Comment on Creative thought as blind-variation and selective retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity by Dean Keith Simonton] Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 184-185.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (2010). Products depend on creative potential: A comment on the productivist industrial model of knowledge production. Gifted and Talented International, 25, 81-87.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svensen, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1995). If You Change Your Name to Mark Twain, Will You Be Judged As Creative? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 367-370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. Jr. (1969). The Talent Student: A Validation of the Creativity Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-12-03

Revised: 2014-12-18

Accepted: 2014-12-21

Published Online: 2015-05-26

Published in Print: 2015-06-01

Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 21–31, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0003.

Export Citation

© Mark A. Runco. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Željko Rački
Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 2017, Volume 4, Number 2
Yun-Hwa Chiang, Chu-Chun Hsu, and Hsi-An Shih
Creativity Research Journal, 2017, Volume 29, Number 4, Page 387
Vlad Petre Glăveanu
Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 2017, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in