Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2354-0036
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Commentary on The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading

Anna N. N. Hui
  • Corresponding author
  • City University of Hong Kong, China
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0008

Abstract

This commentary will take the form of a critical examination into the six research gaps identified by Glăveanu (2014a) in the article The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading by examining carefully whether the proposed criticisms are supported by research evidence and will attempt to focus the discussion on accumulating knowledge of theories in the psychology of education. To consolidate theory construction in the psychology of creativity, researchers should give concise operational definitions that can be examined by reliable and valid measurements with identifiable units of analysis in general or specific participants. Given explicit evidence of this kind, educators can be best informed about how to define, assess, and develop human creativity when applying these theories.

Keywords: Theories of creativity; Research evidence; Applications

REFERENCES

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 5, 997-1013. [Crossref]

  • Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 1, 55-65. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior: Can the Big Five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores? Creativity Research Journal, 22, 90–97. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 60–69.

  • Černe, M., Jaklič, M. & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9, 1, 63-85. [Web of Science]

  • Cohen, L. M. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 3, 169-183. [Crossref]

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Egan, T. M. (2005). Factors influencing individual creativity in the workplace: An examination of quantitative empirical research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 2, 160-181.

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014a). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014b). Thinking through creativity and culture: Toward an integrated model. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.02.15

  • Goncalo, J. A., Flynn, F. J., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 11, 1484-1495. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. [Crossref]

  • falseHass, R. W. (2012). Historiometry as extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique: A comment on Kaufman and Baer. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 3, 356-360. [Web of Science]

  • Hon, A. H. Y. (2013). Does job creativity requirement improve service performance? A multilevel analysis of work stress and service environment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 161-170. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Jesus, S. N., Rus, C. L., Lens, W. & Imaginario, S. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 1, 80–84. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Karwowski, M. & Uszynska-Jarmoc, J. (2014). Creativity: The show must go on. Creativity. Theories-Research-Applications, 1, 1, 4-9; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.01.

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 1, 83–91. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1, 1-12. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. C. & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Aliaouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K. & Riggs, M. (2009). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29, 3, 196-209.

  • Leong, S. (2011). Creativity and the arts in Chinese societies. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 54-62). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

  • Liu, D., Chen, X. P. & Yao, X. (2011). From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 2, 294-309. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Long, H. Y., Plucker, J. A., Yu, Q., Ding, Y. & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in the creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 3, 353–360. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Runco, M. A. &Abdullah, A. M. (2014) Why isn’t creativity being supported? Distressing analyses of grants and awards for creativity research – or lack thereof. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 2, 248–250. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 1, 92-96. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Runco, M. A. & Pagnani, A. R. (2011). Psychological research on creativity. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 63–71). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.116-133). New York, NY: Cambridge University.

  • Stierand, M., Dörfler, V. & MacBryde, J. (2014). Creativity and innovation in haute cuisine: Towards a systemic model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 1,15-28.

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt-Brace.

  • Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, 4, 516-532.

  • Williams, R. L. (1999). Operational definitions and assessment to higher order cognitive constructs. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 4, 411-427. [Crossref]

  • Zhou, J., Shin, S. J. & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2008). Employee self-perceived creativity after mergers and acquisitions: Interactive effects of threat-opportunity perception, access to resources, and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 4, 397-421. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

About the article

Received: 2014-10-27

Revised: 2015-02-18

Accepted: 2015-02-21

Published Online: 2015-05-26

Published in Print: 2015-06-01



Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0008. Export Citation

© Anna N. N. Hui. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in