Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2354-0036
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Creativity is a Label for the Aggregated, Time – Dependent, Subjective Judgments by Creators and by Adopters

Seana Moran
Published Online: 2015-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0009

Abstract

The first premise is that creativity requires a focal perceiver perspective to be determined or assigned. As criteria for perception or judgment, what we currently consider “dimensions” of creativity instead may be “precursors.” Ultimately, creativity shifts meaning for the whole culture. The second premise is that creativity requires a temporal perspective: its assessment is time-dependent on the first instance the perceiver notices. If the perceiver accepts the creative “ it,” then it is shared for others to judge it, creating a diffusion and adaptation process. The strongest form of creativity, then, is when it stands the test of time, goes beyond its own zeitgeist, and is institutionalized for future generations.

Keywords: Creativity judgment; Vygotsky

REFERENCES

  • Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.Google Scholar

  • Becker, M. (1995). Nineteenth-century foundations of creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 3, 219-229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997), The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

  • Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E., (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 231-247.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, H. (1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8-26.Google Scholar

  • Guilford, J. P. (1970). Creativity: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Creative Behavior, 4, 3, 149-170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Moran, S. (2009). What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity? Creativity Research Journal,21, 2-3, 243-257.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Moran, S. (2010). Commitment and creativity: Transforming experience into art. In C. Connery, V. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to meaning-making, play, and the arts (pp. 141-160). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contribution to the dialectic of creativity and development. In K. Sawyer et al., Creativity and development (pp. 61-90). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120.Google Scholar

  • Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future direction in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.Google Scholar

  • Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 1, 151-158.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83-100.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 7, 677-688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-10-31

Revised: 2014-12-19

Accepted: 2014-12-20

Published Online: 2015-05-26

Published in Print: 2015-06-01


Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0009.

Export Citation

© Seana Moran. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Seana Moran
Asia Pacific Education Review, 2015, Volume 16, Number 2, Page 167

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in