Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Status of the Social in Creativity Studies and the Pitfalls of Dichotomic Thinking*

Vlad Petre Glăveanu
Published Online: 2015-05-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0016


Creativity studies seem to be a stronghold for individual-based psychological theories. The reasons for this are numerous and complex and, among them, we can identify certain limited or counter-productive ways of conceptualising the social. In this reply to comments I address both the status of the social in creativity studies and the dichotomies that follow from adopting an external view of society and culture. Among them, the separation between creative potential and achievement is particularly problematic, as it constructs a reified, static, and individual notion of potential, reflected in the measurement of divergent thinking. I propose, towards the end, a perspectival model of creativity that radically socialises divergent thinking by placing the social at the core rather than the periphery of creative production. Finally, I suggest that including time into our theory and research holds the key to overcoming many of the false dichotomies that underline creativity studies, at least in psychology. A thoroughly social perspective on creativity might seem like a daring or foolish endeavour but it is, in my view, also the most promising.

Keywords: Creativity; Social; Potential; Achievement; Divergent thinking; Perspectives; Time


  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208-212.Google Scholar

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-KonsultitOy.Google Scholar

  • Farr, R. M. (1983). Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) and the origins of psychology as an experimental and social science. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 4, 289-301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Citko, K. (2015). “ And what is a beautiful poem” ? Reflections of a poet on Vlad Petre Glăveanu’s ‘The psychology of creativity: A critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 97-101; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creativity and genius: A systems perspective. In A. Steptoe (Ed.) Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp. 39-66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar

  • Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar

  • Gillespie, A. (2006a). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Gillespie, A. (2006b). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49, 87-92.Google Scholar

  • Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73-79.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 1, 48-67.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An intercultural and crossdisciplinary journal, 1, 2, 83-96.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (forthcoming). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior.Google Scholar

  • Gralewski, J. (2015). The Psychology of Creativity: A Discussion Between Creative Potential and Its Realization. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 49-55; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graumann, C. F. (1986). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual: Floyd H. Allport’s contribution to social psychology. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of crowd mind and behavior (pp. 97-116). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Harré, H. R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.) (1998). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Hennessey, B. A. (2015). Comment on “ The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 32-37; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 346–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The Dialogical Self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture Psychology, 7, 243-281.Google Scholar

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 147-160.Google Scholar

  • Hoff, E., & Carlsson, I. (2015). She, You and They – More actors on the creativity research stage! Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 38-43; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Hui, A. N. N. (2015). Commentary on ‘The psychology of creativity: A critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 56-63; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Karwowski, M. (2015). Notes on Creative Potential and Its Measurement. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 4-16; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knopf, A. A. (1924). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Kantor, J. R.Google Scholar

  • Kharkhurin, A. (2015). The Big Question in creativity research: The transcendental source of creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 90-96; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. (2006). Nonverbal test scores as one component of an identification system: Integrating ability, achievement, and teacher ratings. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.). Alternative assessments for identifying gifted and talented students. Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar

  • Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

  • Lubart, T., & Caroff, X. (2015). Has creativity research become a trivial pursuit? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 44-48; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Min Tang, L. (2015). Revisiting the systems approach: Commentary on Glăveanu’s paper “ The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading”. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 79-84; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1997). Social creativity: The challenge of complexity. Translation of Le dimensioni sociali della creatività. Pluriverso, 1, 2, 78-88.Google Scholar

  • Moran, S. (2015). Creativity is a label for the aggregated, time-dependent, subjective judgments by creators and by adopters. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 64-69; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0009.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nijstad, B., & Paulus, P. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326-339). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Persson, R. (2015). Erudite, insightful and immensely important: A commentary on V. P. Glǎveanu’s critical article ‘The psychology of creativity – a critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 17-20; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 1, 36-39.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. A. (2015). A Commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 21-31; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304-325). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tan, A.-G. (2015). Knowing creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 85-89; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanggaard, L. (2015). Reaching out for everyday life creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 75-78; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0011.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanggaard, L. & Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Creativity assessment as intervention: The case of creative learning. Akademisk Kvarter/Academic Quarter, 9(1), 18-30.Google Scholar

  • Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom, 1. London: Murray.Google Scholar

  • Valsiner, J. (Ed.) (1986). The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wagoner, B. (2015). From crisis to creativity: Towards a psychology of creating. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 70-74; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 2,158-177.Google Scholar

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology: An international review, 51, 3, 355-424.Google Scholar

  • Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 1, 24-37.Google Scholar

  • Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism–collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3, 355-366.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-02-04

Revised: 2015-02-10

Accepted: 2015-02-14

Published Online: 2015-05-26

Published in Print: 2015-06-01

* Reply to Comments Part 2

Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0016.

Export Citation

© Vlad Petre Glăveanu. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Maciej Karwowski, Jacek Gralewski, and Grzegorz Szumski
Learning and Individual Differences, 2015, Volume 44, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in