Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2354-0036
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Ideational Pathways: Toward a New Approach for Studying the Life of Ideas

Lene Tanggaard
  • The Center for Qualitative Studies, The International Center for the Cultural Psychology of Creativity, Aalborg University, Kroghstræde 3, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Ronald A. Beghetto
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Educational Psychology, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 2131 Hillside Road Storrs, CT 06269-3007
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-11-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0017

Abstract

What is the life of an idea? How do some ideas result in creative outcomes? People interested in creativity often want to know the answers to these questions. Although there are numerous methods and measures for assessing creative persons and products, there is little by way of methods for documenting and analysing the trajectories of ideas. The purpose of this paper is to address this need by introducing a new approach for tracing and analysing ideational pathways. Ideational pathways refer to the trajectory of ideas in temporal and spatial dimensions. That is, how ideas travel through time and space and whether those ideas end up resulting in creative outcomes. We open the paper by providing a theoretical and conceptual background for ideational pathways. We then introduce an emerging approach for tracing these pathways and apply it to two examples. We close by discussing implications and directions for future research.

Keywords: Creativity research Theoretical critique Creativity measurement Creativity definition Group creativity

References

  • Anderson, D. R. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Is the sky falling or expanding? A promising turning point in the psychology of creativity. Creativity. Theories-Research-Applications, 1, 206-212.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (in press-a). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (in press-b). Leveraging micro-opportunities to address macroproblems: Toward an unshakeable sense of possibility thinking. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg, (Eds.). Creative intelligence in the 21st Century: Grappling with enormous problems and huge opportunities. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. (in press-c). Learning as a creative act. In T. Kettler (Ed.). Modern Curriculum for Gifted and Advanced Learners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for 'mini-c' creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73-79.Google Scholar

  • Brinkmann, S. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in everyday life. CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Dinkins, S. C. (2005). Shared Inquiry: Socratic - Hermeneutic Inter - Viewing and Interpreting. In: Interpretive Studies in Healthcare and the Human Sciences, vol. IV, Beyond Method: Converging Conversations of Philosophy, Methodology and Epistemology. (111-147). Pam Ironside, (ed.). Nancy Diekelmann, series ed. University of Wisconsin Press, Spring 2005.Google Scholar

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity - flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

  • Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69-81.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holland, D. & Lave, J. (2001). History in person - enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series. Santa Fe, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • John-Steiner, V. (1997). Notebooks of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kahl, C.H., Hermes da Fonseca, L., Witte, E.H. (2009). Revisiting creativity research: An investigation of contemporary approaches. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 1-5.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A. & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Littleton, K. & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, K. (2008). The learning landscape of art and craft. In K. Nielsen, S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, L. Tanggaard, P. Musaeus & G. Kraft (Eds). A Qualitative stance. (pp. 47-56). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organizational Studies, 28, 1435-1448.Google Scholar

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A. & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-311.Google Scholar

  • Runco, M. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-04-28

Revised: 2015-06-18

Accepted: 2015-08-17

Published Online: 2015-11-26

Published in Print: 2015-11-01


Citation Information: Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, ISSN (Online) 2354-0036, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0017.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Aleksandra Gajda, Ronald A. Beghetto, and Maciej Karwowski
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2017, Volume 24, Page 250

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in