Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Cultural Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Miller, Toby

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2451-3474
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Politics of Unification in a Fragmented World: Metapopulism and the Precariat

Michael Hauser
Published Online: 2018-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0028

Abstract

Neoliberal capitalism intensified the social fragmentation, which resulted in the upswing of heterogeneous communities without a unifying meta-language that was liberal universalism of citizenship. Our society shows “paralogical” traits and paralogy reverberates in the new populist policy I call metapopulism (Trump, Putin, etc.)-witness their inconsistencies. Metapopulism establishes unifying principles as a substitute of liberal universalism. These are allegory and the Real. An allegorical signifier (“patriotism” etc.), which is separated from the signified (the meaning), is a common representation of heterogeneous communities and simultaneously maintains their paralogy. The Real appears as the signifier that is excluded from “correct” liberal discourse and promises to enhance the experience of a system’s failures by attributing a social meaning to it (sublimation). These principles work on the condition that their promises are permanently thwarted and deferred, which is their spectrality. However, another type of unification may be feasible. It is a unifying discourse and practise that is grounded in a specific position of the “precariat” as the hegemonical class as formed by neoliberal capitalism (the Lukacsian concept). Here, a unification is borne by the praxis of sublimation.

Keywords: fragmentation; unification; metapopulism; precariat; sublimation; Lukacs

References

  • Barassi, Veronica. Activism on the Web: Everyday Struggles Against Digital Capitalism. Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Filipov, David. “Putin can’t seem to find a ‘national idea’ for Russians, so he’s proposing a law to do it.” The Washington Post, 5 November 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin-cant-seem-to-find-a-national-ideafor-russians-so-hes-proposing-a-law-to-do-it/2016/11/05/1fba53d2-a1d5-11e6-8864-6f892cad0865_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.35ae8ff590eb/.Google Scholar

  • Foster, Belamy. “Neofascism in the White House.” Monthly Review, April 1, 2017, https://monthlyreview.org/2017/04/01/neofascism-in-the-white-house/Google Scholar

  • Hauser, Michael. “Metapopulism in-between democracy and populism. Transformations of Laclau’s concept of populism with Trump and Putin.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, 2018, pp. 68-87, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2018.1455599/.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Culture Change. Wiley-Blackwell, 1990Google Scholar

  • Hegel, Georg W.F. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art, vol. I. Trans. T. M. Knox. Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism, Or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Lukács, George. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar

  • Lütjen, Torben. “As people ‛sort’ themselves, consequences for democracy.” Journal Sentinel, 25 December 2012, http://archive.jsonline.com/news/opinion/as-people-sort-themselves-consequences-for-democracy-dq818lu-184769081.html/Google Scholar

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Parenti, Christian. “Listening to Trump.” Jacobin Magazin, 22 November 2016, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/11/trump-speeches-populism-war-economics-election/.Google Scholar

  • Pomerantsev, Peter. “The Hidden Author of Putinism.” The Atlantic, 7 November 2014, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/hidden-author-putinism-russia-vladislav-surkov/382489/Google Scholar

  • Rorty, Richard. “Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity.” Praxis International, vol. 4, no.1, 1984, pp. 32-44.Google Scholar

  • Standing, Guy. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Taggart, Paul. “New Populist Party in Western Europe.” West European Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, 1995, pp. 34-51.Google Scholar

  • Taggart, Paul. Populism. Open University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Tamás, Gáspár, M. “On Post-fascism: The Degradation of Universal Citizenship.” Boston Review, 1 June 2000, http://bostonreview.net/world/g-m-tam%C3%A1s-post-fascismGoogle Scholar

  • Tenbruck, Friedrich H. Die kulturellen Grundlagen der Gesellschaft. Der Fall der Moderne. Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Toffler, Alvin. Future Shock. Random House, 1970.Google Scholar

  • Traverso, Enzo. “Trump’s Savage Capitalism: The Nightmare is Real.” World Policy Journal, vol. 34, no.1, 2017, pp. 13-17.Google Scholar

  • Whitebook, Joel. “Trump’s Method, Our Madness.” The New York Times, 20 March 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/opinion/trumps-method-our-madness.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSourc=e=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-right-region&region=opinion-c-col-right-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-rightregion&_r=1Google Scholar

  • Zima, Peter V. Modern/Postmodern. Society, Philosophy, Literature. Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Žižek, Slavoj. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. Verso, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Žižek, Slavoj. For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. Verso, 2008.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-01

Accepted: 2018-09-02

Published Online: 2018-10-31

Published in Print: 2018-10-01


Citation Information: Open Cultural Studies, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 307–318, ISSN (Online) 2451-3474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0028.

Export Citation

© by Michael Hauser, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in