Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Cultural Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Miller, Toby

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Post-work Futures and Full Automation: Towards a Feminist Design Methodology

Sarah Elsie Baker
Published Online: 2018-12-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0049


Among business leaders, government officials and academics there is a general consensus that new technological developments such as artificial intelligence, robotics and the internet of things have the potential to “take our jobs.” Rather than resisting and bemoaning this radical shift, theorists such as Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams have argued that full automation, universal basic income, and future thinking, should be demanded in order to challenge neo-liberal hegemony. Helen Hester has gone on to consider the limits and potentials of this manifesto in regard to the automation of reproductive labour. In this article, I take this work as a starting point and consider the significant burden that is left at the designer’s door in the post-work/post-capitalist imaginary. I explore the changes that would need to be made to design methods: techniques that are themselves part of the history of industrial capitalism. Focusing on the automation of domestic labour and drawing on feminist theory and emergent design practice, I begin to develop a feminist design methodology; without which I argue that an emancipatory post-work politics cannot be realised.

Keywords: automation; design; post-capitalism; feminism


  • Bath, Corinne. “Searching for Methodology: Feminist Technology Design in Computer Science.” /elib.suub.uni-bremen.de/ip/docs/00010427.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Bardzell, Shaowen. “Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design.” CHI 2010: HCI For All. http://dmrussell.net/CHI2010/docs/p1301.pdf.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Utopias of Participation: Feminism, Design, and the Futures.” ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact, vol. 25, no. 1, 6 February 2018, pp.1-25.Google Scholar

  • Berg, Anne-Jorunn. “A Gendered Socio-Technical Construction: The Smart House.” Information Technology and Society: a Reader, edited by Nick Heap et al., Sage, 1995, pp. 74-89.Google Scholar

  • Blauvelt, Andrew. “The Rise of the Relational: 5 themes in relational design.” sds.parsons.edu/designdialogues/?post_type=article&p=68.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Tim. “Design Thinking.” www.ideou.com/pages/design-thinking.Google Scholar

  • Buckley, Cheryl. “Made in Patriarchy: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design.” Design Issues, vol. 3, no. 2, 1986, pp. 3-14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chambers, Deborah. Changing Media, Homes and Households. Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Chidgey, Red. “The Need for New in Feminist Activist Discourse: Notes Towards a Scene of Anachronism.” Undutiful Daughters: New Directions in Feminist Thought and Practice, edited by Henrietta Gunkel et al., Palgrave MacMillan, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Cowen, Ruth Schwartz. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Cruddas, John. “The Humanist Left Must Challenge the Rise of Cyborg Socialism.” The New Statesman, 23 April 2018, www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2018/04/humanist-left-must-challenge-rise-cyborg-socialism.Google Scholar

  • Dunne, Anthony and Fiona Raby. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction and Social Dreaming. MIT Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Escobar, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Felski, Rita. Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Forlano, Laura. “Posthumanism and Design.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, vol. 3, no. 1, Spring 2017.Google Scholar

  • Forlano, Laura, and Megan Halpern. “Reimagining Work: Entanglements and Frictions around Future of Work Narratives.”Google Scholar

  • Fibreculture, vol. 26. 2016.Google Scholar

  • Frey, Carl Benedikt and Michael A. Osbourne “The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation.” 2013. www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/.../The_Future_of_Employment.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Fry, Tony., et al. Design and the Question of History. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations: Taking Care of Unexpected Country.” 2011. http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2011/05/01/speculative-fabulations-for-technocultures-generations-taking-careof-unexpected-country/.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations.” 2007. www.patriciapiccinini.net/writing/30/437/66.Google Scholar

  • ---. “A Cyborg Manifesto.” Manifestly Haraway. University of Minnesota Press. 2016.Google Scholar

  • Hayden, Dolores. The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods and Cities. MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Hester, Helen. “After Work: What’s Left and Who Cares?” Youtube, uploaded by Goldsmiths Art, 19 April 2016. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynnGV3RHy2c.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Technically Female: Women, Machines, and Hyperemployment.” Salvage. 2016. salvage.zone/in-print/technicallyfemale- women-machines-and-hyperemployment/Google Scholar

  • Hollows, Joanne. Domestic Cultures. Open University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Irwin, Terry., et al. “Transition Design 2015.” design.cmu.edu/sites/default/files/Transition_Design_Monograph_final.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Julier, Guy. The Culture of Design. Sage, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Kay, Joseph. “Postcapitalist Ecology: A Comment on Inventing the Future.” The Disorder of Things. 4 November 2015, thedisorderofthings.com/2015/11/04/postcapitalist-ecology-a-comment-on-inventing-the-future/.Google Scholar

  • Malpass, Matt. Critical Design in Context: History, Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Manyika, James et al. “A Future that works: automation, employment and productivity.” McKinsey Global Institute. 2017. www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/digital-disruption/harnessing-automation-for-a-future-that-works.Google Scholar

  • Mason, Paul. Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. Allen Lane, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Papanek, Victor. Design for the Real World. Thames & Hudson, 1972.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Prado de O. Martins, Luiza. “Privilege and Oppression: Towards a Feminist Speculative Design.” DES2104, 2014, www.drs2014.org/media/654480/0350-file1.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Prado, Luiza and Pedro Oliviera. “Futuristic Gizmos, Conservative Ideals: On Speculative Anachronistic Design.” Modes of Criticism, 27 February 2015. modesofcriticism.org/futuristic-gizmos-conservative-ideals/.Google Scholar

  • Rosner, Daniela K. Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design. The MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Samuel, Raphael. Theatres of Memory: Past and Present in Contemporary Culture. Verso, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Simonsen, Jesper and Toni Robertson. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Sandilands, Catriona. “Mother Earth, The Cyborg and the Queer and (More) Questions of Identity.” NWSA Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, 1997, pp. 18-40.Google Scholar

  • Soderback, Fanny. in Henrietta Gunkel. et al. (2012) Undutiful Daughters: New Directions in Feminist Thought and Practice. Palgrave MacMillan US, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Srnicek, Nick and Alex Williams. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. Verso, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Suchman, Lucy. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, 2002, pp. 91-106.Google Scholar

  • Tonkinwise, Cameron. 2013. November 9. “Design Transitions: Expert Interview.” The Measures Taken, 9 November 2013, dasaufnahme.wordpress.com/2013/11/09/design-transitions-expert-interview/.Google Scholar

  • Wajcman, Judy. Technofeminism. Polity, 2013.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-07

Accepted: 2018-11-03

Published Online: 2018-12-13

Published in Print: 2018-12-01

Citation Information: Open Cultural Studies, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 540–552, ISSN (Online) 2451-3474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0049.

Export Citation

© by Sarah Elsie Baker, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in