Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Cultural Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Miller, Toby

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2451-3474
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Dissipating the Political: Battersea Power Station and the Temporal Aesthetics of Development

Ameeth Vijay
Published Online: 2018-12-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0056

Abstract

This article analyses the idiom of “placemaking” in contemporary development, specifically considering the Battersea Power Station development in south London. It argues that the recourse to a highly aestheticised concept of place allows development to mediate the structural transformations they are enacting and create a narrative and discourse about development that deflects and dissipates political critique. In order for public-private “regeneration” to proceed as the default mode of urbanisation for contemporary London, developers need to not only create sound investments but also produce a hegemonic cultural narrative that articulates the stakes of their interventions in ways that make them not just compelling but inarguable and inevitable. Three modes of conceptualising the redeveloped city are considered: the concept of place, the aesthetic of the garden and rhetoric of sustainability, and the ethos of creativity. Together, these constitute a vision for the future technological city that seeks to render political disagreement marginal if not unthinkable.

Keywords: development; aesthetics; gentrification

References

  • Adams, Ross. “Longing for a Greener Present: Neoliberalism and the Eco-City.” Radical Philosophy, vol. 163, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Adams, Stephen. “General Election 2010: For David Cameron, Battersea Power Station Is a Place Called Hope.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Anguelovski, Isabelle. “From Toxic Sites to Parks as (Green) Lulus? New Challenges of Inequity, Privilege, Gentrification, and Exclusion for Urban Environmental Justice.” CPL bibliography, vol. 31, no. 1, 2015, pp. 23-36, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bai, Xuemei. “Six Research Priorities for Cities and Climate Change.” Nature, vol. 555, 2018, pp. 23-25.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • BPSDC. “Community Charter.” Battersea Power Station Development Corporation, 2014.Google Scholar

  • ---. “The Cranes.” Battersea Power Station Development Corporation https://batterseapowerstation.co.uk/about/heritagecranes.Google Scholar

  • ---. “An Englishman in New York.” Powerhouse, vol. 4, 2015.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Foster + Partners Design Book.” Battersea Power Station Development Company, 2014.Google Scholar

  • ---. “The Icon Book.” Battersea Power Station Development Corporation, 2014.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Living Architecture.” Powerhouse, vol. 3, 2014.Google Scholar

  • ---. The Placebook. Battersea Power Station Development Company and JTP Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Positive Energy.” vol. 1, Battersea Power Station Development Corporation, 2014.Google Scholar

  • ---. “Wild at Heart.” Powerhouse, vol. 5, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Checker, Melissa. “Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental Gentrification and the Paradoxical Politics of Urban Sustainability.” City & Society, vol. 23, no. 2, 2011, pp. 210-229, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cities, Guardian. “Revealed: The Insidious Creep of Pseudo-Public Space in London.” The Guardian, Guardian Media Group, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Committee, London Assembly Environment. “A Lot to Lose: London’s Disappearing Allotments.” 2006.Google Scholar

  • Davidson, Mark and Loretta Lees. “New-Build ‘Gentrification’ and London’s Riverside Renaissance.” Environment and Planning A, vol. 37, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Dooling, Sarah. “Ecological Gentrification: A Research Agenda Exploring Justice in the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 33, no. 3, 2009, pp. 621-639, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Florida, R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Turtleback Books, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Gandy, Matthew. “Urban Nature and the Ecological Imaginary.” In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, edited by Nikolas C. Heynen et al., Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Gould, Kenneth A. and Tammy L. Lewis. Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice. Routledgw, 2016. Routledge Equity, Justice and the Sustainable City Series.Google Scholar

  • Harris, Andrew. “Art and Gentrification: Pursuing the Urban Pastoral in Hoxton, London.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 37, 2012.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, David. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Hatherley, Owen. “Battersea Power Station.” Icon, Media 10, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Jager, Michael. “Class Definition and the Esthetics of Gentrification.” Gentrification of the City, edited by Neil Smith and Peter Williams, Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar

  • Kern, Leslie. “From Toxic Wreck to Crunchy Chic: Environmental Gentrification through the Body.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 33, no. 1, 2015, pp. 67-83, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kollewe, Julia and Hilary Osborne. “Battersea Power Station Home Prices ‘Defying All Logic’.” The Guardian, Guardian Media Group, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Ley, David. “Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification.” Urban Studies, vol. 40, no. 12, 2003, pp. 2527-2544, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lloyd, D. and P. Thomas. Culture and the State. Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Olds, Kris. “Globalization and Urban Change: Tales from Vancouver Via Hong Kong.” Urban Geography, vol. 19, no. 4, 2013, pp. 360-385, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osborne, Hilary. “Poor Doors: The Segregation of London’s Inner-City Flat Dwellers.” The Guardian, Guardian Media Group, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Pearsall, Hamil. “Moving out or Moving In? Resilience to Environmental Gentrification in New York City.” Local Environment, vol. 17, no. 9, 2012, pp. 1013-1026, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quastel, Noah. “Political Ecologies of Gentrification.” Urban Geography, vol. 30, no. 7, 2013, pp. 694-725, doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement. University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Shenker, Jack. “Privatised London: The Thames Path Walk That Resembles a Prison Corridor.” The Guardian, Guardian Media Group, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Sinfield, A. Literature, Politics, and Culture in Postwar Britain. University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Neil. “Gentrification, the Frontier and the Restructuring of Urban Space.” Gentrification of the City, edited by Neil Smith and Peter Williams, Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar

  • Swyngedouw, Erik. “The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 33, no. 3, 2009, pp. 601-620, doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Terada, Rei. “Repletion: Masao Adachi’s Totality.” Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 24, no. 2, 2016, pp. 15-43.Google Scholar

  • Zukin, Sharon. Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Rutgers University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-28

Accepted: 2018-10-26

Published Online: 2018-12-31

Published in Print: 2018-12-01


Citation Information: Open Cultural Studies, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 611–625, ISSN (Online) 2451-3474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0056.

Export Citation

© by Ameeth Vijay, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in