Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Cultural Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Miller, Toby

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2451-3474
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Empowering Signs: Writing and e-motions in Michel Houellebecq’s Platform

Claire Lozier
Published Online: 2018-12-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0060

Abstract

This article explores the working of the cultural literacy concepts of rhetoricity and textuality in Michel Houellebecq’s third novel Platform through the lens of French philosopher Frederic Lordon’s affect theory, with a view to understanding the way emotions and motion operate jointly through writing in this post-travel literature text dealing with the contemporary travel industry, sex tourism, and emotional alienation. As such, it contributes to the current reassessment of the role played by emotions in human interactions. By exploring the specific layered textuality of Platform, which purposefully recycles a series of discursive cliches and tropes, I show how Houellebecq’s writing style demands to be considered not only for its literary value but also for its potent, and perhaps unexpected, moving effects, or rhetoricity, which invite readers to reconsider their perception of alterity-i.e. the world and the other-but also of the performative power of art and literature. In order to demonstrate this, the article looks first at the failure of travel writing orchestrated in the novel; it then analyses alternative textual modalities of affect mediation trialed in the text; and finally, it considers the strategies used in Platform to “empowerise” signs and, as a result, those who read them.

Keywords: Houellebecq; Lordon; rhetoricity; travel writing; affects

References

  • Amossy, Ruth. Les Idées reçues. Sémiologie du stéréotype [Received Ideas. Semiology of the Stereotype]. Nathan, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Amossy, Ruth, and Herschberg-Pierrot, Anne. Stéréotypes et clichés [Stereotypes and Clichés]. Nathan, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Seuil, 1970.Google Scholar

  • Beuchot, Mauricio, and Jerez, José Luis. Manifiesto del nuevo realismo analógico [Manifesto of New Analogical Realism]. Circulo Herméneutico, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Comte, Auguste. Cours de philosophie positive [Course in Positive Philosophy]. Larousse, 1936.Google Scholar

  • Cultural Literacy in Europe Key Concepts. Web. 20 November 2017 <http://cleurope.eu/about/key-concepts/>Google Scholar

  • Ferraris, Maurizio. Manifesto del nuovo realismo [Manifesto of New Realism]. Laterza, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Gabriel, Markus. Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar

  • Houellebecq, Michel. Interventions. Flammarion, 1998.Google Scholar

  • ---. Platforme. Flammarion, 2001.Google Scholar

  • ---. Platform. Translated by Frank Wynne, William Heinemann, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Korthals Altes, Liesbeth. “Persuasion et ambiguïté dans un roman à thèse postmoderne.” [“Persuasion and Ambiguity in a Postmodern Thesis Novel.”] Michel Houellebecq, edited by S. van Wesemael, Rodopi, 2004, pp. 29-45.Google Scholar

  • Lordon, Frédéric. La Société des affects: pour un structuralisme des passions [The Society of Affects: Towards a Structuralism of Passions]. Seuil, 2013.Google Scholar

  • ---. Imperium: structures et affects des corps politiques [Imperium: Structures and Affects of Political Bodies]. La fabrique éditions, 2015.Google Scholar

  • ---. Les Affects de la politique [The Affects of Politics]. Seuil, 2016.Google Scholar

  • McCann, John. “La Lutte des discours: Plateforme de Michel Houellebecq.” Michel Houellebecq sous la loupe. [“Discourse Struggle: Michel Houellebecq’s Platform.” Michel Houellebecq under Scrutiny], edited by M. L. Clément, S. van Wesemael. Rodopi, 2007, pp. 367-377.Google Scholar

  • Morrey, Douglas. Michel Houellebecq. Humanity and its Aftermath. Liverpool University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Ní Loingsigh, Aedín. “Tourist Traps: Confounding Expectations in Michel Houellebecq’s Platforme.” French Cultural Studies 16.1, 2005, pp. 73-90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Posthumus, Stéphanie. “Les Enjeux des animaux (humains) chez Michel Houellebecq, du darwinisme au post-humanisme.” [“Questions of (Human) Animals in Michel Houellebecq, from Darwinism to Posthumanism.”] French Studies vol. LXVIII, no. 3, 2014, pp. 359-376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robert, Anne-Cécile. La Stratégie de l’émotion [The Strategy of Emotion]. Lux, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. L’Existentialisme est un humanisme [Existentialism is a Humanism]. Gallimard, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de. Cours de linguistique générale [Course in General Linguistics]. Payot, 1916.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-04-25

Accepted: 2018-11-17

Published Online: 2018-12-31

Published in Print: 2018-12-01


Citation Information: Open Cultural Studies, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 668–675, ISSN (Online) 2451-3474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0060.

Export Citation

© by Claire Lozier, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in