Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Dialectologia et Geolinguistica

Journal of the International Society for Dialectology and Geolinguistics

Ed. by van Nahl, Astrid

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.071
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.114

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.101
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.215

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Ther varom mid j hia: Tracing linguistic diffusion in the history of Norwegian using kernel density estimation

Tam Blaxter
Published Online: 2019-11-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dialect-2019-0002


Tracing the diffusion of linguistic innovations in space from historical sources is challenging. The complexity of the datasets needed in combination with the noisy reality of historical language data mean that it has not been practical until recently. However, bigger historical corpora with richer spatial and temporal information allow us to attempt it. This paper presents an investigation into changes affecting first person non-singular pronouns in the history of Norwegian: first, individual changes affecting the dual (vit > mit) and plural (vér > mér), followed by loss of the dual-plural distinction by merger into either form or replacement of both by Danish-Swedish vi. To create dynamic spatial visualisations of these changes, the use of kernel density estimation is proposed. This term covers a range of statistical tools depending on the kernel function. The paper argues for a Gaussian kernel in time and an adaptive uniform (k-nearest neighbours) kernel in space, allowing uncertainty or multiple localisation to be incorporated into calculations. The results for this dataset allow us to make a link between Modern Norwegian dialectological patterns and language use in the Middle Ages; they also exemplify different types of diffusion process in the spread of linguistic innovations.

Keywords: historical dialectology; Norwegian; kernel density estimation; statistical methods; GIS


  • Bailey, Guy, Tom Wikle, Jan Tillery & Lori Sand. 1993. Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 5: 359–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benskin, Michael, Vasilis Karaiskos, Keith Williamson & Margaret Laing. 2013. An Electronic Version of A Linguistic Atlas of Late Medieval English Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/elalme/elalme.html

  • Blaxter, Tam T. 2017a. Annotated DN online Cambridge. icge.co.uk/dn_online/

  • Blaxter, Tam T. 2017b. Speech in space and time: Contact, change and diffusion in medieval Norway Cambridge: University of Cambridge Ph.D. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.15576

  • Burridge, James. 2017. Spatial Evolution of Human Dialects. Physical Review X 7 (3). doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031008. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031008 (20 January, 2018).Web of Science

  • Burridge, James. 2018. Unifying models of dialect spread and extinction using surface tension dynamics. Royal Society Open Science 5(1). 171446. doi:10.1098/rsos.171446CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Fotheringham, Stewart, Chris Brunsdon & Martin Charlton. 2003. Geographically weighted regression John Wiley & Sons, Limited.Google Scholar

  • Gramacki, Artur. 2018. Nonparametric Kernel density estimation and its computational aspects (Studies in Big Data 37). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Haugen, Einar. 1976. The Scandinavian languages: An introduction to their history (The Great Languages). London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

  • Indrebø, Gustav. 1951. Norsk målsoga Bergen: J. Griegs boktr.Google Scholar

  • Jahr, Ernst Håkon (ed.). 1990. Den store dialektboka 1. oppl. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar

  • Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Joel Priestly, Kristin Hagen, Tor Anders Åfarli & Øystein Alexander Vangsnes. 2009. The Nordic Dialect Corpus http://tekstlab.uio.no/nota/scandiasyn/ (23 March, 2018).

  • Laing, Margaret. 2013. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325 Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Nerbonne, John. 2010. Measuring the diffusion of linguistic change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365(1559): 3821–3828. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0048.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noreen, Adolf. 1970. Altisländische und altnorwegische Grammatik: (Laut- und Flexionslehre); unter Brücksichtigung des Urnordischen (Altnordische Grammatik von Adolf Noreen; 1). 5., unveränd. Aufl. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Parzen, Emanuel. 1962. On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33(3). 1065–1076. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettersen, Egil. 1975. Språkbrytning i Vest-Norge 1450–1550 Bergen: Alma Mater.Google Scholar

  • Pettersen, Egil. 1991. Språkbrytning i Vest-Norge 1450–1550 II. Bergen: Alma Mater.Google Scholar

  • Rosenblatt, Murray. 1956. Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density Function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27(3). 832–837. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rumpf, Jonas, Simon Pickl, Stephan Elspass & Werner König. 2009. Structural analysis of dialect maps using methods from spatial statistics. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 76: 280–308.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar

  • Séguy, J. 1973. La relation entre la distance spatiale et la distance lexicale. Rev. Linguist. Romane 35: 335–357.Google Scholar

  • Seip, Didrik Arup. 1955. Norsk språkhistorie til omkring 1370 2nd edn. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar

  • Studer-Joho, Nicole. 2014. Diffusion and change in early middle English: methodological and theoretical implications from the LAEME corpus of tagged texts (Schweizer Anglistische Arbeiten 141). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3: 215–246. doi:10.1017/S0047404500004358CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tylden, Per. 1944. Me vi: ein studie frå det gamalnorske og mellomnorske brevriket (Skrifter utgitt av Det norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo. II, Hist.-filos. klasse 1944:4). Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Tylden, Per. 1958. 2. persons personlege pronomen dualis og pluralis i gamalnorsk og mellomnorsk diplommål (Universitetet i Bergen Årbok 1956: Historisk-Antikvarisk Rekke 4), eds. Hans Brattström, Johs. Bøe, Th. M. Vogelsang & Leif J. Wilhelmsen. Bergen: A/S John Griegs Boktrykkeri.Google Scholar

  • Versloot, Arjen P. 2008. Mechanisms of language change: vowel reduction in 15th century West Frisian (LOT International Series 195). Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT).Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, David & Michael Tiefelsdorf. 2005. Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems 7: 161–187. doi:10.1007/s10109-005-0155-6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wikle, Thomas & Guy Bailey. 1997. The spatial diffusion of linguistic features in Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 77: 1–15.Google Scholar

  • Willis, David. 2017. Investigating geospatial models of the diffusion of morphosyntactic innovations: The Welsh strong second-person singular pronoun chdi. Journal of Linguistic Geography 5: 41–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-11-08

Published in Print: 2019-11-26

Citation Information: Dialectologia et Geolinguistica, Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 5–34, ISSN (Online) 1867-0903, ISSN (Print) 0942-4040, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dialect-2019-0002.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in