Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Dialectologia et Geolinguistica

Journal of the International Society for Dialectology and Geolinguistics

Ed. by van Nahl, Astrid

1 Issue per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.154
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.182

CiteScore 2016: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.102
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.464

Online
ISSN
1867-0903
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Variation in the realization of /εi/ by Dutch youngsters: from local urban dialects to emerging ethnolects?

Linda van Meel / Frans Hinskens / Roeland van Hout
Published Online: 2014-11-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dialect-2014-0004

Abstract

How do speakers of current Turkish and Moroccan ethnolects of Dutch deal with phonemes that do not exist in their heritage languages and that are at the same time subject to pronounced regional and social variation in the Dutch speech community at large, such as the Dutch diphthong /εi/? This diphthong does not occur in Turkish and Berber and it occurs only as a dialectal allophone in certain dialects of Moroccan Arabic.

Data from speakers from the Amsterdam and Nijmegen urban areas are studied. In the Amsterdam dialect, the diphthong is traditionally subject to monophthongization and lowering, yielding realizations as [a:] or [a:], while in Nijmegen the diphthong is only subject to monophthongization, resulting in the variant [ε:]. Recently, a new lowered, diphthongal variant [ai] entered colloquial spoken standard Dutch. Therefore, ethnolect speakers have a wide range of variants to ‘choose’ from: the traditional standard Dutch variant [εi], the new variant [ai], which is expanding areally and socially, and the monophthongal variants of the surrounding urban dialects.

Two variable properties of /εi/ are examined: (1) height of the prominent first element, and (2) the degree of monophthongization. The urban dialect features which had developed into sociolect features over the past generations appear to be undergoing social redistribution to become ethnolect markers.

About the article

Published Online: 2014-11-13

Published in Print: 2014-11-01


Citation Information: Dialectologia et Geolinguistica, ISSN (Online) 1867-0903, ISSN (Print) 0942-4040, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dialect-2014-0004.

Export Citation

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Remy van Rijswijk, Antje Muntendam, and Ton Dijkstra
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2017, Volume 32, Number 8, Page 984

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in