Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

DNA Barcodes

Ed. by Mitchell, Andrew

1 Issue per year


Emerging Science

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2299-1077
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies – can this marker help to explain conflicts in cyprinids?

S. Behrens-Chapuis
  • Corresponding author
  • Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ F. Herder
  • Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ H. R. Esmaeili
  • Ichthyology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ J. Freyhof
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ N. A. Hamidan
  • The Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature – Conservation Division, P.O. Box 1215, Jubaiha 11941, Jordan and Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Science, School of Applied Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, U.K.
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ M. Özuluğ
  • Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 34134 Vezneciler, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ R. Šanda / M. F. Geiger
  • Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-11-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dna-2015-0020

Abstract

DNA barcoding is a fast and reliable tool for species identification, and has been successfully applied to a wide range of freshwater fishes. The limitations reported were mainly attributed to effects of geographic scale, taxon-sampling, incomplete lineage sorting, or mitochondrial introgression. However, the metrics for the success of assigning unknown samples to species or genera also depend on a suited taxonomic framework. A simultaneous use of the mitochondrial COI and the nuclear RHO gene turned out to be advantageous for the barcode efficiency in a few previous studies. Here, we examine 14 cyprinid fish genera, with a total of 74 species, where standard DNA barcoding failed to identify closely related species unambiguously. Eight of the genera (Acanthobrama, Alburnus, Chondrostoma, Gobio, Mirogrex, Phoxinus, Scardinius, and Squalius) contain species that exhibit very low interspecific divergence, or haplotype sharing (12 species pairs) with presumed introgression based on mtCOI data. We aimed to test the utility of the nuclear rhodopsin marker to uncover reasons for the high similarity and haplotype sharing in these different groups. The included labeonine species belonging to Crossocheilus, Hemigrammocapoeta, Tylognathus and Typhlogarra were found to be nested within the genus Garra based on mtCOI. This specific taxonomic uncertainty was also addressed by the use of the additional nuclear marker. As a measure of the delineation success we computed barcode gaps, which were present in 75% of the species based on mtCOI, but in only 39% based on nuclear rhodopsin sequences. Most cases where standard barcodes failed to offer unambiguous species identifications could not be resolved by adding the nuclear marker. However, in the labeonine cyprinids included, nuclear rhodopsin data generally supported the lineages as defined by the mitochondrial marker. This suggests that mitochondrial patterns were not mislead by introgression, but are caused by an inadequate taxonomy. Our findings support the transfer of the studied species of Crossocheilus, Hemigrammocapoeta, Tylognathus and Typhlogarra to Garra.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: Barcode gap; mtCOI; nuclear rhodopsin (ncRHO); Cyprinidae; labeonine cyprinids; introgression

References

  • [1] Ward R.D., Zemlak T.S., Innes B.H., Last P.R., Hebert P.D.N., DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 2005, 360, 1847-1857Google Scholar

  • [2] Wong E.H.K., Hanner R.H., DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood, Food Res. Int., 2008, 41, 828 - 837CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Steinke D., Zemlak T.S., Hebert P.D., Barcoding Nemo: DNA-based identifications for the ornamental fish trade, PLoS One, 2009, 4, e6300Google Scholar

  • [4] Kochzius M., Seidel C., Antoniou A., Botla S.K., Campo D., Cariani A., et al., Identifying fishes through DNA barcodes and microarrays, PLoS One, 2010, 5, e12620Google Scholar

  • [5] Ward R.D., Bronwyn H.H., William T.W., Last P.R., DNA barcoding Australasian chondrichthyans: results and potential uses in conservation, Mar. Freshwater Res., 2008, 59, 57-71CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Ward R.D., Hanner R., Hebert P.D.N., The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL, J. Fish Biol., 2009, 74, 329-356CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] April J., Mayden R.L., Hanner R.H., Bernatchez L., Genetic calibration of species diversity among North America’s freshwater fishes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2011, 108, 10602-10607CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Zemlak T.S., Ward R.D., Connell A.D., Holmes B.H., Hebert P.D.N., DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2009, 9, 237-242CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Mabragana E., Diaz de Astarloa J.M., Hanner R., Zhang J., Gonzalez Castro M., DNA barcoding identifies Argentine fishes from marine and brackish waters, PLoS One, 2011, 6, e28655Google Scholar

  • [10] Geiger M.F., Herder F., Monaghan M.T., Almada V., Barbieri R., Bariche M., et al., Spatial heterogeneity in the mediterranean biodiversity hotspot affects barcoding accuracy of its freshwater fishes, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2014, 14, 1210-1221CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Knebelsberger T., Landi M., Neumann H.H., Kloppmann M., Sell A. F., Campbell P.D., et al., A reliable DNA barcode reference library for the identification of the North European shelf fish fauna, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2014, 14, 1060-1071Google Scholar

  • [12] Knebelsberger T., Dunz A.R., Neumann D., Geiger M.F., Molecular diversity of Germany’s freshwater fishes and lampreys assessed by DNA barcoding, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2015, 15, 562-572CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Lucentini L., Puletti M.E., Ricciolini C., Gigliarelli L., Fontaneto D., Lanfaloni L., et al., Molecular and phenotypic evidence of a new species of genus Esox (Esocidae, Esociformes, Actinopterygii): the southern pike, Esox flaviae, PloS One, 2011, 6, e25218Google Scholar

  • [14] Puckridge M., Andreakis N., Appleyard S.A., Ward R.D., Cryptic diversity in flathead fishes (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae) across the Indo‐West Pacific uncovered by DNA barcoding, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2013, 13, 32-42CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Denys G.P.J., Dettai A., Persat H., Hautecoeur M., Keith P., Morphological and molecular evidence of three species of pikes Esox spp. (Actinopterygii, Esocidae) in France, including the description of a new species, C. R. Biol., 2014, 337, 521-534Google Scholar

  • [16] Moritz C., Cicero C., DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls, PLoS Biol., 2004, 2, e354CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Meyer C.P., Paulay G., DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling, PLoS Biol., 2005, 3, e422CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] DeSalle R., Species Discovery versus Species Identification in DNA Barcoding Efforts: response to Rubinoff, Conserv. Biol., 2006, 20, 1545-1547CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Scribner K., Page K., Bartron M., Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference, Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 2000, 10, 293-323CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Salzburger W., Baric S., Sturmbauer C., Speciation via introgressive hybridization in East African cichlids?, Mol. Ecol., 2002, 11, 619-625CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Freyhof J., Lieckfeldt D., Pitra C., Ludwig A., Molecules and morphology: evidence for introgression of mitochondrial DNA in Dalmatian cyprinids, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2005, 37, 347-354CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Aboim M.A., Mavarez J., Bernatchez L., Coelho M.M., Introgressive hybridization between two Iberian endemic cyprinid fish: a comparison between two independent hybrid zones, J. Evol. Biol., 2010, 23, 817-828CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Herder F., Schliewen U.K., Beyond sympatric speciation: Radiation of sailfin silverside fishes in the Malili Lakes (Sulawesi). In: Glaubrecht M. (Ed.), Evolution in Action - Adaptive Radiations and the Origins of Biodiversity, 1st ed., Springer, Heidelberg, 2010Google Scholar

  • [24] Helfman G.S., Collete B.B., Facey D.E., The Diversity of Fishes, 3rd ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Malden, 1997 Google Scholar

  • [25] Nelson J.S., Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley & Sons, New York, 2006Google Scholar

  • [26] Winfield I. J., Nelson, J. S., Cyprinid fishes: Systematics, biology and exploitation, 1st ed., Chapman & Hall, London, 1991Google Scholar

  • [27] Howe K., Clark M. D., Torroja C. F., Torrance J., Berthelot C., Muffato M., et al., The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome, Nature, 2013, 496, 498-503Google Scholar

  • [28] Menon A.G.K., Monograph of the cyprinid fishes of the genus Garra Hamilton, Mem. Ind. Mus., 1964, 14, 173-260Google Scholar

  • [29] Zheng L., Junxing Y., Xiaoyong C., Phylogeny of the Labeoninae (Teleostei, Cypriniformes) based on nuclear DNA sequences and implications on character evolution and biogeography, Curr. Zool., 2012, 58, 837-850CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Yang L., Arunachalam M., Sado T., Levin B.A., Golubtsov A.S., Freyhof J., et al., Molecular phylogeny of the cyprinid tribe Labeonini (Teleostei: Cypriniformes), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2012, 65, 362-379CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Hamidan N.A., Geiger M.F., Freyhof J., Garra jordanica, a new species from the Dead Sea basin with remarks on the relationship of G. ghorensis, G. tibanica and G. rufa (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, 2014, 25, 223-236Google Scholar

  • [32] Monaghan M.T., Balke M., Gregory T.R., Vogler A.P., DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 2005, 360, 1925-1933Google Scholar

  • [33] Elias M., Hill R.I., Willmott K.R., Dasmahapatra K.K., Brower A.V.Z., Malllet J., et al., Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies, Proc. Biol. Sci., 2007, 274, 2881-2889Google Scholar

  • [34] Sonnenberg R., Nolte A.W., Tautz D., An evaluation of LSU rDNA D1-D2 sequences for their use in species identification, Front. Zool., 2007, 4, 6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Vuataz L., Sartori M., Wagner A., Monaghan M.T., Toward a DNA taxonomy of alpine Rhithrogena (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) using a mixed Yule-coalescent analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, PloS One, 2011, 6, e19728Google Scholar

  • [36] Venkatesh B., Ning Y., Brenner S., Late changes in spliceosomal introns define clades in vertebrate evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 10267- 10271CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Sevilla R.G., Diez A., Noren M., Mouchel O., Jerome M., Verrez‐ Bagnis V., et al., Primers and polymerase chain reaction conditions for DNA barcoding teleost fish based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b and nuclear rhodopsin genes, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2007, 7, 730-734CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Chen W.J., Bonillo C., Lecointre G., Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2003, 26, 262-288CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [39] Chen W.J., Miya M., Saitoh K., Mayden R.L., Phylogenetic utility of two existing and four novel nuclear gene loci in reconstructing Tree of Life of ray-finned fishes: the order Cypriniformes (Ostariophysi) as a case study, Gene, 2008, 423, 125-134CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Hanner R., Floyd R., Bernard A., Collette B.B., Shivji M., DNA barcoding of billfishes, Mitochondrial DNA, 2011, 22, 27-36Google Scholar

  • [41] Denys G.P.J., Dettai A., Persat H., Doadrio I., Cruaud C., Keith P., Status of the Catalan chub Squalius laietanus (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in France: input from morphological and molecular data, Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 2013, 408, 04 Google Scholar

  • [42] Collins R.A., Armstrong K.F., Meier R., Yi Y., Brown S.D., Cruickshank R.H., et al., Barcoding and border biosecurity: identifying cyprinid fishes in the aquarium trade, PLoS One, 2012, 7, e28381Google Scholar

  • [43] Ivanova N.V., Zemlak T.S., Hanner R., Hebert P.D.N., Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2007, 7, 544-548CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44] Edgar R.C., MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput, Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32, 1792-1797CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Hava S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., et al., Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data, Bioinformatics, 2012, 28, 1647-1649CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Brown S.D., Collins R., Boyer S., Lefort M.C., Malumbres-Olarte J., et al., Spider: an R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2012, 12, 562-565CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47] Collins R.A., Boykin L.M., Cruickshank R.H., Armstrong K.F., Barcoding’s next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification, Methods Ecol. Evol., 2012, 3, 457-465CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [48] Srivathsan A., Meier R., On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2- parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature, Cladistics, 2012, 28, 190-194Google Scholar

  • [49] Kimura M., A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences, J. Mol. Evol., 1980, 16, 111-120CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50] Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar, S., MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0., Mol. Biol. Evol., 2013, 30, 2725-2729Google Scholar

  • [51] Posada D., Crandall, K.A., MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution, Bioinformatics, 1998, 14, 817-818CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [52] Tamura K., Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C content biases, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1992, 9, 4, 678-687 Google Scholar

  • [53] Hubert N., Hanner R., Holm E., Mandrak N.E., Taylor E., Burridge M., et al., Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes, PloS One, 2008, 3, e2490Google Scholar

  • [54] Brown W.M., George M.Jr., Wilson A.C., Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1979, 76, 1967-1971CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [55] Brown W.M., Prager E.M., Wang A., Wilson A.C., Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution, J. Mol. Evol., 1982, 18, 225-239CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [56] Brown W.M., Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA, In: Nei M., Koehn R.K. (Eds.), Evolution of genes and proteins, 1st ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 1983Google Scholar

  • [57] Moritz C., Dowling T.E., Brown W.M., Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1987, 18, 269-292CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [58] Bortolus A., Error cascades in the biological sciences: the unwanted consequences of using bad taxonomy in ecology, Ambio, 2008, 37, 114-118CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [59] Goren M., Fishelson L., Trewavas E., The cyprinid fishes of Acanthobrama Heckel and related genera, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool., 1973, 24, 293-315Google Scholar

  • [60] Perea S., Bohme M., Zupančič P., Freyhof J., Šanda R., Ozuluğ M., et al., Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical patterns in Circum-Mediterranean subfamily Leuciscinae (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) inferred from both mitochondrial and nuclear data, BMC Evol. Biol., 2010, 10, 265CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [61] Lautredou A.C., Bonillo C., Denys G., Cruaud C., Ozouf-Costaz C., Lecointre G., et al., Molecular taxonomy and identification within the Antarctic genus Trematomus (Notothenioidei, Teleostei): How valuable is barcoding with COI?, Polar Sci., 2010, 4, 333-352 Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-02-27

Accepted: 2015-10-01

Published Online: 2015-11-26

Published in Print: 2015-01-01


Citation Information: DNA Barcodes, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 187–199, ISSN (Online) 2299-1077, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dna-2015-0020.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Anja Palandačić, Alexander Naseka, David Ramler, and Harald Ahnelt
BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2017, Volume 17, Number 1
[5]
I. Hashemzadeh Segherloo, A. Abdoli, S. Eagderi, H. R. Esmaeili, G. Sayyadzadeh, L. Bernatchez, E. Hallerman, M. F. Geiger, M. Özulug, J. Laroche, and J. Freyhof
Hydrobiologia, 2017, Volume 785, Number 1, Page 47

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in