Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Diagnosis

Official Journal of the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine (SIDM)

Editor-in-Chief: Graber, Mark L. / Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Argy, Nicolas / Epner, Paul L. / Lippi, Giuseppe / McDonald, Kathryn / Singh, Hardeep

Editorial Board: Basso , Daniela / Crock, Carmel / Croskerry, Pat / Dhaliwal, Gurpreet / Ely, John / Giannitsis, Evangelos / Katus, Hugo A. / Laposata, Michael / Lyratzopoulos, Yoryos / Maude, Jason / Newman-Toker, David / Singhal, Geeta / Sittig, Dean F. / Sonntag, Oswald / Zwaan, Laura

4 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2194-802X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Defining the critical role of nurses in diagnostic error prevention: a conceptual framework and a call to action

Kelly T. Gleason / Patricia M. Davidson / Elizabeth K. Tanner
  • School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Diana Baptiste / Cynda Rushton
  • School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jennifer Day / Melinda Sawyer / Deborah Baker / Lori Paine / Cheryl R. Dennison Himmelfarb
  • School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ David E. Newman-Toker
  • School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-07-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2017-0015

Abstract

Nurses have always been involved in the diagnostic process, but there remains a pervasive view across physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals that medical diagnosis is solely a physician responsibility. There is an urgent need to adjust this view and for nurses to take part in leading efforts addressing diagnostic errors. The purpose of this article is to define a framework for nursing engagement in the diagnostic process that can serve as a catalyst for nurses to engage in eliminating preventable harms from diagnostic error. We offer a conceptual model to formalize and expand nurses’ engagement in the diagnostic process through education, maximize effectiveness of interprofessional teamwork and communication through culture change, and leverage the nursing mission to empower patients to become active members of the diagnostic team. We describe the primary barriers, including culture, education, operations, and regulations, to nurses participating as full, equal members of the diagnostic team, and illustrate our approach to addressing these barriers. Nurses already play a major role in diagnosis and increasingly take ownership of this role, removing barriers will strengthen nurses’ ability to be equal, integral diagnostic team members. This model should serve as a foundation for increasing the role of the nurse in the diagnostic process, and calling nurses to take action in leading efforts to reduce diagnostic error.

Keywords: diagnostic error; interprofessional collaboration; nursing

References

  • 1.

    Singh H, Giardina TD, Meyer AN, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:418–25.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Singh H, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:727–31.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    National Academy of Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015. Available at: http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2015/Improving-Diagnosis-in-Healthcare.aspx. Accessed: 25 Nov 2016.

  • 4.

    Thomas DB, Newman-Toker DE. Diagnosis is a team sport – partnering with allied health professionals to reduce diagnostic errors. Diagnosis 2016;3:49–59.Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Fairman JA, Rowe JW, Hassmiller S, Shalala DE. Broadening the scope of nursing practice. N Engl J Med 2011;364: 193–6.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession. Nursing Diagnosis, 1999. Available at: http://www.nursinglaw.com/nursingdiagnosis.htm. Accessed: 26 Dec 2016.

  • 7.

    International NANDA. Nursing Diagnoses, 2016. Available at: http://www.nanda.org/nanda-international-glossary-of-terms.html. Accessed: 26 Dec 2016.

  • 8.

    Carlton EW, Khattab A, Greaves K. Beyond triage: the diagnostic accuracy of emergency department nursing staff risk assessment in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Emerg Med J 2016;33:99–104.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Gatewood MO, Wemple M, Greco S, Kritek PA, Durvasula R. A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:787–95.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    McColl T, Gatien M, Calder L, Yadav K, Tam R, Ong M, et al. Implementation of an emergency department sepsis bundle and system redesign: a process improvement initiative. Can J Emerg Med 2017;19:1–10.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Torsvik M, Gustad LT, Mehl A, Bangstad IL, Vinje LJ, Damas JK, et al. Early identification of sepsis in hospital inpatients by ward nurses increases 30-day survival. Crit Care 2016;20:244.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Mohite AA, Johnson A, Rathore DS, Bhandari K, Crossman R, Mehta P, et al. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of benign eyelid lesions: Is a dedicated nurse-led service safe and effective? Orbit 2016;35:193–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Banning M. Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: concepts and research studies. Nurse Educ Pract 2008;8:177–83.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Lee J, Chan AC, Phillips DR. Diagnostic practise in nursing: a critical review of the literature. Nurs Health Sci 2006;8:57–65.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    Shindul-Rothschild J, Read CY, Stamp KD, Flanagan J. Nurse staffing and hospital characteristics predictive of time to diagnostic evaluation for patients in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2017;43:138–44.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Litchfield IJ, Bentham LM, Lilford RJ, Greenfield SM. Test result communication in primary care: clinical and office staff perspectives. Fam Pract 2014;31:592–7.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 17.

    Broyles LM, Rosenberger E, Hanusa BH, Kraemer KL, Gordon AJ. Hospitalized patients’ acceptability of nurse-delivered screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012;36:725–31.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Gormley GJ, Steele WK, Gilliland A, Leggett P, Wright GD, Bell AL. Can diagnostic triage by general practitioners or rheumatology nurses improve the positive predictive value of referrals to early arthritis clinics? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:763–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Wade J, Holding PN, Bonnington S, Rooshenas L, Lane A, Salter CE, et al. Establishing nurse-led active surveillance for men with localised prostate cancer: development and formative evaluation of a model of care in the ProtecT trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008953.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Vitale J, Mumoli N, Giorgi-Pierfranceschi M, Cresci A, Cei M, Basile V, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of nurse-performed and physician-performed lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of cardiogenic dyspnea. Chest 2016;150:470–1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Newman AR. Nurses’ perceptions of diagnosis and prognosis-related communication: an integrative review. Cancer Nurs 2016;39:E48–60.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    Buckingham CD, Adams A. Classifying clinical decision making: a unifying approach. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:981–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Buckingham CD, Adams A. Classifying clinical decision making: interpreting nursing intuition, heuristics and medical diagnosis. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:990–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 24.

    Levett-Jones T, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Jeong SY, Noble D, Norton CA, et al. The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: an educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Educ Today 2010;30:515–20.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Ashcraft S, Bordelon C, Fells S, George V, Thombley K, Shirey MR. Interprofessional clinical rounding: effects on processes and outcomes of care. J Healthc Qual 2017;39:85–94.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Cifra CL, Jones KL, Ascenzi JA, Bhalala US, Benbea MM, Newman-Toker DE, et al. Diagnostic errors in a PICU: insights from the morbidity and mortality conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015;16:468–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Eliminating CLABSI, A National Patient Safety Imperative: Final Report. Rockville, MD, 2013.Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Evans SM, Smith BJ, Esterman A, Runciman WB, Maddem G, Stead K, et al. Evaluation of an intervention aimed at improving voluntary incident reporting in hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:169–75.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 29.

    Reading T, Fox J, Day S. Tracking level one trauma center staff behaviors on adverse event reporting. J Healthc Risk Manag 2004;24:27–32.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 30.

    Tuttle D, Holloway R, Baird T, Sheehan B, Skelton WK. Electronic reporting to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:281–6.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Weingart SN, Ship AN, Aronson MD. Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:470–7.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Graber ML, Trowbridge R, Myers JS, Umscheid CA, Strull W, Kanter MH. The next organizational challenge: finding and addressing diagnostic error. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2014;40:102–10.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33.

    Milch CE, Salem DN, Pauker SG, Lundquist TG, Kumar S, Chen J. Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. An analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:165–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 34.

    Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Harnessing the potential of health care collaboratives: lessons from the Keystone ICU project. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches, Vol. 2. Rockville, MD: Culture and Redesign, 2008.Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD000072.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Singh H, Wilson L, Reis B, Sawhney MK, Espadas D, Sittig DF. Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf 2010;6: 121–3.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 37.

    Al Sayah F, Szafran O, Robertson S, Bell NR, Williams B. Nursing perspectives on factors influencing interdisciplinary teamwork in the Canadian primary care setting. J Clin Nurs 2014;23: 2968–79.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 38.

    Ely JW, Graber ML, Croskerry P. Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors. Acad Med 2011;86:307–13.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Kerber KA, Newman-Toker DE. Misdiagnosing dizzy patients: common pitfalls in clinical practice. Neurol Clin 2015;33:565–75, viii.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 40.

    Newman-Toker DE. Missed stroke in acute vertigo and dizziness: it is time for action, not debate. Ann Neurol 2016;79:27–31.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Grewal K, Austin PC, Kapral MK, Lu H, Atzema CL. Missed strokes using computed tomography imaging in patients with vertigo: population-based cohort study. Stroke 2015;46:108–13.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 42.

    Kerber KA, Brown DL, Lisabeth LD, Smith MA, Morgenstern LB. Stroke among patients with dizziness, vertigo, and imbalance in the emergency department: a population-based study. Stroke 2006;37:2484–7.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Fradgley EA, Paul CL, Bryant J, Collins N, Ackland SP, Bellamy D, et al. Collaborative patient-centered quality improvement: a cross-sectional survey comparing the types and numbers of quality initiatives selected by patients and health professionals. Eval Health Prof 2016;39:475–95.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 44.

    Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. Br Med J 2001;323:908–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 45.

    Heald AH, Anderson SG, Khan A, Stocker J, Davies S, Bliss K, et al. Success rates in a diabetes specialist nurse-led education programme: re-setting the glucostat. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2017;125:297–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 46.

    Odnoletkova I, Ramaekers D, Nobels F, Goderis G, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L. Delivering diabetes education through nurse-led telecoaching. Cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163997.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 47.

    Moon KJ, Lee SM. The effects of a tailored intensive care unit delirium prevention protocol: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2015;52:1423–32.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 48.

    Dammeyer JA, Mapili CD, Palleschi MT, Eagle S, Browning L, Heck K, et al. Nurse-led change: a statewide multidisciplinary collaboration targeting intensive care unit delirium. Crit Care Nurs Q 2012;35:2–14.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 49.

    Mattison G, Bilney M, Haji-Michael P, Cooksley T. A nurse-led protocol improves the time to first dose intravenous antibiotics in septic patients post chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:5001–5.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 50.

    Lakdawala L. Creating a safer perioperative environment with an obstructive sleep apnea screening tool. J Perianesth Nurs 2011;26:15–24.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 51.

    Lattimer V, George S, Thompson F, Mullee M, Turnbull J, Smith H, et al. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group. Br Med J 1998;317:1054–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 52.

    Lattimer V, Sassi F, George S, Moore M, Turnbull J, Mullee M, et al. Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2000;320:1053–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 53.

    Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Kraemer KL, Sevick MA, Price PA, Gordon AJ. A qualitative study of anticipated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nurse-delivered alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for hospitalized patients in a Veterans Affairs medical center. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2012;7:7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 54.

    Serksnys D, Nanchal R, Fletcher KE. Opportunities for interprofessional input into nurse and physician hand-off communication. J Crit Care 2016;38:47–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 55.

    Sanfilippo F, Bendapudi N, Rucci A, Schlesinger L. Strong leadership and teamwork drive culture and performance change: Ohio State University Medical Center 2000–2006. Acad Med 2008;83:845–54.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 56.

    Damschroder LJ, Banaszak-Holl J, Kowalski CP, Forman J, Saint S, Krein SL. The role of the champion in infection prevention: results from a multisite qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:434–40.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 57.

    Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. Br Med J 2008;337:a1714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 58.

    Wand AP, Thoo W, Sciuriaga H, Ting V, Baker J, Hunt GE. A multifaceted educational intervention to prevent delirium in older inpatients: a before and after study. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:974–82.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 59.

    Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2016.Google Scholar

  • 60.

    Amico PP, H. Maryland’s new global budgets for hospitals: testing the incentive effect of volume controls. North Carolina, US: RTI International, 2016.Google Scholar

  • 61.

    Staggs VS, He J. Recent trends in hospital nurse staffing in the United States. J Nurs Adm 2013;43:388–93.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 62.

    Van Bogaert P, van Heusden D, Timmermans O, Franck E. Nurse work engagement impacts job outcome and nurse-assessed quality of care: model testing with nurse practice environment and nurse work characteristics as predictors. Front Psychol 2014;5:1261.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 63.

    Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing. Summary of the February 2010 forum on the future of nursing education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2010. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12894. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.

  • 64.

    National Council of State Boards of Nursing. State and Territorial Boards of Nursing: What Every Nurse Needs to Know. Chicago, IL: NCSBN, 2011.Google Scholar

  • 65.

    Texas Board of Nursing. Nursing Practice Act. Section 301.002. Available at: https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_scope_of_practice_rn.asp. Accessed 26 Dec 2016.

About the article

Corresponding author: Kelly T. Gleason, RN, PhD(c), School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, 525 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA, Phone: +(708)334-4876

Drs. Cheryl R. Dennison Himmelfarb and David E. Newman-Toker are co-senior authors.


Received: 2017-04-06

Accepted: 2017-06-06

Published Online: 2017-07-19

Published in Print: 2017-11-27


Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: Kelly T. Gleason received support from predoctoral fellowship in Interdisciplinary Training in Cardiovascular Health Research, T32 NR012704, and Predoctoral Clinical Research Training Program, TL1 TR001078. David Newman-Toker’s effort was supported by the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.


Citation Information: Diagnosis, Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 201–210, ISSN (Online) 2194-802X, ISSN (Print) 2194-8011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2017-0015.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Kelly T. Gleason, Penny Greenberg, and Cheryl R. Dennison Himmelfarb
The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2019, Volume 34, Number 1, Page 6
[2]
Kelly T. Gleason, Susan Peterson, Eileen Kasda, Diana Rusz, Anna Adler-Kirkley, Zheyu Wang, and David E. Newman-Toker
Diagnosis, 2018, Volume 0, Number 0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in