Berger D. A brief history of medical diagnosis and the birth of the clinical laboratory. Part 2 – laboratory science and professional certification in the 20th century. MLO Med Lab Obs 1999;31:32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Laboratory medicine: a national status report. Fall Church, VA: The Lewin Group, 2008.Google Scholar
ECRI Institute. Top 10 Patient Safety Concerns for Healthcare Organizations. Available at: www.ecri.org/PatientSafetyTop10. Accessed: 6 July 2017.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The OSSIE guide to clinical handover improvement. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2009.Google Scholar
Clinical Excellence Commission NSW Government. Incident Management. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/incident-management/incident-reporting. Accessed: 30 July 2018.
Clinical Excellence Commission. Clinical Focus Report: Diagnostic tests – How access and follow-up affect patient outcomes. 2012. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0007/259198/patient-safety-report-diagnostic-tests.pdf. Accessed: 30 July 2018.
Saleem JJ, Russ AL, Neddo A, Blades PT, Doebbeling BN, Foresman BH. Paper persistence, workarounds, and communication breakdowns in computerized consultation management. Int J Med Inform 2011;80:466–79.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Acadamies Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Dahm MR, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Greenfield D, Horvath AR, Wakefield D, et al. Delivering safe and effective test-result communication, management and follow-up: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020235.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Georgiou A, Lymer S, Forster M, Strachan M, Graham S, Hirst G, et al. Lessons learned from the introduction of an electronic safety net to enhance test result management in an Australian mothers’ hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:1104–8.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Ash J, Singh H, Sittig DF. Test Results Reporting and Follow-Up SAFER Guide. November 2016. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/safer_test_results_reporting.pdf. Accessed: 30 July 2018.
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). Guideline on pathology testing in the Emergency Department. Available at: https://www.rcpa.edu.au/getattachment/8424e33b-8688-4c7d-b5ab-fbc4c38bccb9/Pathology-Testing-in-the-Emergency-Department.aspx. Accessed: 30 July 2018.
NSW Health. Health Care Records – Documentation and Management. 2012. Available at: https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/PD2012_069.pdf. Accessed: 30 July 2018.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:104–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Menon S, Murphy DR, Singh H, Meyer AN, Sittig DF. Workarounds and test results follow-up in electronic health record-based primary care. Appl Clin Inform 2016;7:543–59.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Eikey EV, Reddy MC, Kuziemsky CE. Examining the role of collaboration in studies of health information technologies in biomedical informatics: a systematic review of 25 years of research. J Biomed Inform 2015;57:263–77.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalal AK, Poon EG, Karson AS, Gandhi TK, Roy CL. Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital discharge. J Hosp Med 2011;6:16–21.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Dalal AK, Roy CL, Poon EG, Williams DH, Nolido N, Yoon C, et al. Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:473–80.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, Sittig DF, Esquivel A, Singh S, et al. Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011;11:22.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Murphy DR, Meyer AN, Russo E, Sittig DF, Wei L, Singh H. The burden of inbox notifications in commercial electronic health records. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:559–60.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Smith MW, Hughes AM, Brown C, Russo E, Giardina TD, Mehta P, et al. Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record – enabled primary care. Health Informatics J 2018:1–14. doi:10.1177/1460458218779114. [In Press].Google Scholar
Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e162.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Christensen K, Sue VM. Viewing laboratory test results online: patients’ actions and reactions. J Participat Med 2013;5:e38.Google Scholar
Cimino JJ, Patel VL, Kushniruk AW. The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records. Int J Med Inform 2002;68:113–27.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Giardina TD, Baldwin J, Nystrom DT, Sittig DF, Singh H. Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017;25:440–6.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Bell SK, Gerard M, Fossa A, Delbanco T, Folcarelli PH, Sands KE, et al. A patient feedback reporting tool for OpenNotes: implications for patient-clinician safety and quality partnerships. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:312–22.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation, World Alliance for Patient Safety. Research priority setting working group. World alliance for patient safety – summary of the evidence on patient safety: implications for research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.Google Scholar
Watt S. Quality use of pathology consumer consultation project. 11th National Rural Health Conference, Perth, Australia. 2011. Available at: http://ruralhealth.org.au/11nrhc/papers/11th%20NRHC%20Watt_Sarah_D5.pdf. Accessed: 30 July 2018.
About the article
Published Online: 2018-10-17
Published in Print: 2018-11-27
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: This forum was held as part of a larger project funded under the National Health and Medical Research Council, Partnership Project Grant number 1111925.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.