Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. Br Med J Qual Saf 2013;22:672–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby J, Krieger H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Making 2014;35:539–57.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff CC, Tobler PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16: Article number 138.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sullivan C, Staib A, Khanna S, Good NM, Boyle J, Cattell R, et al. The National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) and the 4-hour rule: time to review the target. Med J Aust 2016;204:354.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Medford-Davis L, Park E, Shlamovitz G, Suliburk J, MeyerAN, Singh H. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2016;33:253–9.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bell K, Strand H, Inder WJ. Effect of a dedicated osteoporosis health professional on screening and treatment in outpatients presenting with acute low trauma non-hip fracture: a systematic review. Arch Osteoporos 2014;9:167.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Riches N, Panagioti M, Alam R, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Campbell S, Esmail A, et al. The effectiveness of electronic differential diagnoses (DDX) generators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148991.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abimajyi-Ochom J, Mudiyanselage S, Catchpool M, Firipis M, Watts J. Strategies to prevent diagnostic errors: a literature review. Melbourne: Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, 2017.Google Scholar
Gilmartin H, Goyal A, Hamati MC, Mann J, Saint S, Chopra V. Brief mindfulness practices for healthcare providers – a systematic literature review. Am J Med 2017;130:1219.e1–17.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alam R, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Panagioti M, Esmail A, Campbell S, Panagopoulou E. Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review. BMC Fam Pract 2017;18.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mardis M, Davis J, Benningfield B, Elliott C, Youngstrom M, Nelson B, et al. Shift-to-Shift handoff effects on patient safety and outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Med Qual 2017;32:34–42.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
McDonald K, Matesic B, Contopoulos-Iannidis D, Lonhart J, Schmidt E, Pineda N, et al. Patient safety strategies targeted at diagnostic errors – a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:381–9.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Hamilton P, Eschiti VS, Hernandez K, Neill D. Differences between weekend and weekday nurse work environments and patient outcomes: a focus group approach to model testing. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2007;21:331–41.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Peberdy MA, Ornato JP, Larkin GL, Braithwaite RS, Kashner TM, Carey SM, et al. Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest during nights and weekends. J Am Med Assoc 2008;299:785–92.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleason K, Davidson P, Tanner E, Baker D, Baptiste D, Rushton C, et al. Defining the critical role of nurses in diagnostic error prevention: a conceptual framework and a call to action. Diagnosis 2017;4:201–10.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington: National Academies Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academies Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Payne VL, Singh H, Meyer AN, Levy L, Harrison D, Graber ML. Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89:687–96.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2019-05-22
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author contributions: BW and PB conceived the study and methodology. BW, PB and NK undertook data curation and analysis. MG provided guidance on structure and data analysis. BW drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision and editing. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: This research was conducted with funding from the Victorian Managed Insurance Authority (VMIA) Research and Innovation Program; Ref: VMIA-MIRI 2016. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.