Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Diagnosis

Official Journal of the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine (SIDM)

Editor-in-Chief: Graber, Mark L. / Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Argy, Nicolas / Epner, Paul L. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Singhal, Geeta / McDonald, Kathryn / Singh, Hardeep / Newman-Toker, David

Editorial Board: Basso , Daniela / Crock, Carmel / Croskerry, Pat / Dhaliwal, Gurpreet / Ely, John / Giannitsis, Evangelos / Katus, Hugo A. / Laposata, Michael / Lyratzopoulos, Yoryos / Maude, Jason / Sittig, Dean F. / Sonntag, Oswald / Zwaan, Laura


CiteScore 2018: 0.69

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.359
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.424

Online
ISSN
2194-802X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Interpreting clinical and laboratory tests: importance and implications of context

Alan N. Charney
  • Corresponding author
  • Clinical Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Langone Health, Division of Nephrology, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; and 47 Laura Lane, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jordan T. Dourmashkin
Published Online: 2019-08-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0009

Abstract

Clinical and laboratory tests in clinical medicine include a range of measurements that may be categorized as “normal range” tests, positive or negative tests, or contextual tests. Normal range test results are quantitative and are compared to a reference interval or range provided by the laboratory. Positive or negative tests are also quantitative tests and characteristically have a cutoff value that specifies the result. Contextual tests require a context, a physiological condition, to correctly interpret the result. A closer examination of reference intervals suggests that these also are contextual. The fact that there is a range of apparently normal values indicates the presence of cultural, biological, physiological and behavioral diversity in the population sampled to determine normality. As such, the reference interval describes the population from which it was determined and may have utility in this regard.

Keywords: clinical decisions; context; contextual; laboratory tests; normal range; normality; reference interval

References

  • 1.

    McPherson RA, Pincus MR, editors. Henry’s clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods, 23rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier, 2017.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Cebal RD, Beck JR. Biochemical profiles. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:403–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Fletcher GS, editors. Clinical epidemiology, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2014.Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Denic A, Glassock RJ, Rule AD. Structural and functional changes with the aging kidney. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2016;23:19–28.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Banker A, Bell C, Gupta-Malhotra M, Samuels J. Blood pressure percentile charts to identify high or low blood pressure in children. BMC Pediatr 2016;16:98.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Larsson A, Palm M, Hansson LO, Axelsson O. Reference values for clinical chemistry tests during normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:874–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Ehrenkranz JL. Home and point-of-care pregnancy tests: a review of the technology. Epidemiology 2002;13:S15–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    Shulman ST, Bisno AL, Clegg HW, Gerber MA, Kaplan EL, Lee G, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of group a streptococcal pharyngitis: 2012 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:e86–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Nerenz RD, Gronowski AM. Qualitative point of care human chorionic gonadotropin testing: can we diffuse this ticking time bomb? Clin Chem 2015;61:483–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Cook JD, Strauss KA, Caplan YH, Lodico CP, Bush DM. Urine pH: the effects of time and temperature after collection. J Anal Toxicol 2007;31:486–96.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 11.

    Soriano JR. Renal tubular acidosis: the clinical entity. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:2160–70.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Schrier RW. Diagnostic value of urinary sodium, chloride, urea, and flow. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1610–3.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Galla JH. Metabolic alkalosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;2:369–75.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Braun MM, Barstow CH, Pyzocha NA. Diagnosis and management of sodium disorders: hyponatremia and hypernatremia. Am Fam Physician 2015;91:299–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    Makaryus AN, McFarlane SI. Diabetes insipidus: diagnosis and treatment of a complex disease. Cleve Clinic J Med 2006;73:65–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl 1):S11–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 17.

    Ozarda Y, Ichihara K, Bakan E, Polat H, Ozturk N, Baygutalp NK, et al. A nationwide multicentre study in Turkey for establishing reference intervals of haematological parameters with novel use of a panel of whole blood. Biochem Med 2017;27:350–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Guelinckx I, Ferreira-Pêgo C, Moreno LA, Kavouras SA, Gandy J, Martinez H, et al. Intake of water and different beverages in adults across 13 countries. Eur J Nutr 2015;54(Suppl 2):S45–55.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 19.

    Kraut JA, Madias NE. Re-evaluation of the normal range of serum total CO2 concentration. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018;13:343–7.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Alan N. Charney, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Langone Health, Division of Nephrology, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA; and 47 Laura Lane, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA, E-mail: ancharney@gmail.com


Received: 2019-02-13

Accepted: 2019-07-31

Published Online: 2019-08-17


Author contributions: Alan N. Charney, MD, conceived, researched and wrote the submitted manuscript. Jordan T. Dourmashkin, PA-C researched and wrote the submitted manuscript. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.


Citation Information: Diagnosis, 20190009, ISSN (Online) 2194-802X, ISSN (Print) 2194-8011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0009.

Export Citation

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in