Gregory CJ, Nasrollahzadeh F, Dharmar M, Parsapour K, Marcin JP. Comparison of critically ill and injured children transferred from referring hospitals versus in-house admissions. Pediatrics 2008;121:e906–11.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Odetola FO, Clark SJ, Gurney JG, Dechert RE, Shanley TP, Freed GL. Effect of interhospital transfer on resource utilization and outcomes at a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2009;24:379–86.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philpot C, Day S, Marcdante K, Gorelick M. Pediatric interhospital transport: diagnostic discordance and hospital mortality. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:15–9.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Han YY, Carcillo JA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, Watson RS, Westerman ME, et al. Early reversal of pediatric-neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcome. Pediatrics 2003;112:793–9.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akcan Arikan A, Williams EA, Graf JM, Kennedy CE, Patel B, Cruz AT. Resuscitation bundle in pediatric shock decreases acute kidney injury and improves outcomes. J Pediatr 2015;167:1301–5.e1.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Graff LG, Chern C-H, Radford M. Emergency physicians’ acute coronary syndrome testing threshold and diagnostic performance: acute coronary syndrome critical pathway with return visit feedback. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2014;13:99–103.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chern C-H, How C-K, Wang L-M, Lee C-H, Graff L. Decreasing clinically significant adverse events using feedback to emergency physicians of telephone follow-up outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:15–23.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Introduction. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015:19–30.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Summary. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015:1–18.Google Scholar
Omron R, Kotwal S, Garibaldi BT, Newman-Toker DE. The diagnostic performance feedback “calibration gap”: why clinical experience alone is not enough to prevent serious diagnostic errors. AEM Educ Train 2018;2:339–42.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:26–31.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne VL, Hysong SJ. Model depicting aspects of audit and feedback that impact physicians’ acceptance of clinical performance feedback. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:260.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:433–6.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brehaut JC, Colquhoun HL, Eva KW, Carroll K, Sales A, MichieS, et al. Practice feedback interventions: 15 suggestions for optimizing effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:435–41.PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Friedman CP, Gatti GG, Franz TM, Murphy GC, Wolf FM, Heckerling PS, et al. Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct? Implications for decision support and error reduction. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:334–9.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Grubenhoff JA, Ziniel SI, Bajaj L, Hyman D. Pediatric faculty knowledge and comfort discussing diagnostic errors: a pilot survey to understand barriers to an educational program. Diagn (Berl) 2019;6:101–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipitz-Snyderman A, Kale M, Robbins L, Pfister D, Fortier E, PocusV, et al. Peers without fears? Barriers to effective communication among primary care physicians and oncologists about diagnostic delays in cancer. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:892–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal JL, Okumura MJ, Hernandez L, Li S-TT, Rehm RS. Interfacility transfers to general pediatric floors: a qualitative study exploring the role of communication. Acad Pediatr 2016;16:692–9.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2019-10-25
Award identifier / Grant number: #HD027748
Dr. Cifra is supported by a National Institutes of Health Institutional K12 grant (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009633, #HD027748). Dr. Singh is supported in part by the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA (#CIN 13-413).
Author contributions: Dr. Cifra and Dr. Tigges conceptualized and designed the study; developed, reviewed, and finalized the survey instrument; organized, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and drafted, reviewed, and revised the manuscript. Dr. Miller contributed to the design of the study and the survey instrument, supervised and coordinated the survey pilot, interpreted the data, and reviewed the manuscript. Dr. Herwaldt and Dr. Singh reviewed the study design, interpreted the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.