Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Company and Financial Law Review

Ed. by Bergmann, Alfred / Drescher, Ingo / Fleischer, Holger / Goette, Wulf / Harbarth, Stephan / Hommelhoff, Peter / Krieger, Gerd / Merkt, Hanno / Teichmann, Christoph / Vetter, Jochen / Weller, Marc-Philippe / Wicke, Hartmut


CiteScore 2018: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.159

Online
ISSN
1613-2556
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 6, Issue 1

Issues

Abuse of Law in the Context of European Insolvency Law

Horst Eidenmüller
Published Online: 2009-05-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2009.1

Abuse of law is a concept that can be found in the private laws of many jurisdictions in the world. The European Court of Justice has recently resorted to the concept quite often when dealing with the reach of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EC Treaty. This article applies the abuse of law concept to European insolvency law questions. Of central importance here are the rules determining jurisdiction to open main insolvency proceedings under the European Insolvency Regulation (EIR). Such jurisdiction is tied to a debtor's ‘Centre of Main Interests’ (COMI) which can be changed – abusively. The article starts by exploring the context of the debate on abuse of law with respect to European insolvency law. It is characterised by regulatory competition between the Member States. The general elements of the abuse of law concept are then presented. It is an interpretative concept that looks at the dominant purpose of a particular legal provision. The article explores this concept with respect to potential abuses of freedom of establishment on the one hand and the EIR on the other hand in an insolvency context. Its main thesis is that COMI shifts that evidently do not contribute to maximising the debtor's net assets are abusive. COMI shifts that evidently benefit the debtor at the expense of its creditors or some creditors at the expense of others fall into this category: they are driven by distributive rather than by efficiency concerns. The article concludes with a proposal to amend the EIR such that reliance on the abuse of law concept to prevent opportunistic COMI shifts would be less pressing.

About the article

Published Online: 2009-05-13

Published in Print: 2009-04-01


Citation Information: European Company and Financial Law Review, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 1–28, ISSN (Online) 1613-2556, ISSN (Print) 1613-2548, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2009.1.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[4]
Horst G. M. Eidenmueller and Johanna Stark
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2015
[5]
Eilis Ferran
SSRN Electronic Journal , 2001
[6]
Aleksandra Krawczyk-Giehsmann
European Business Organization Law Review, 2019
[7]
Marek Szydło
European Business Organization Law Review, 2010, Volume 11, Number 2, Page 253
[8]
Alessandro Melcarne and Giovanni B. Ramello
Small Business Economics, 2018
[9]
Andrea Zorzi
European Business Organization Law Review, 2017, Volume 18, Number 2, Page 251
[10]
Horst Eidenmüller and Kristin van Zwieten
European Business Organization Law Review, 2015, Volume 16, Number 4, Page 625

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in