Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Education Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Bastiaens, Theo

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2544-7831
See all formats and pricing
More options …

When Students Design University: a Case Study of Creative Interdisciplinarity between Design Thinking and Humanities

Alessandra Molinari
  • Corresponding author
  • Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo”, DISCUI - Palazzo Petrangolini, Piazza Rinascimento, 7, 61029, Urbino (PU), Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andrea Alessandro Gasparini
Published Online: 2019-09-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0002

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of how to enhance student participation in university governance. This issue is approached by taking into account the growing pressures of the European Commission’s modernization agenda on the educational policies of the European Higher Education Area, and by focusing on the way these pressures affect students’ conceptions of themselves and of the mission of higher education. The thesis presented in this paper is that design thinking and the humanities share a common epistemological core that enables them, if applied in educational settings, to play a major role in fostering students’ trust in their governance skills and in their ability to influence educational policies through a creative mindset and a deeper comprehension of the stakes in present-day higher education. An experimental workshop combining design thinking with the humanities and with the constructivist approach of student-centered learning was held within a course in a humanities bachelor program on the basis of a heuristic framework developed through an interdisciplinary research process. This process was conducted according to the principles of design and hermeneutics. The outcomes of the workshop in terms of the participants’ enhanced self-confidence and decisional skills validate the thesis of this study.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: European Higher Education Area; student participation in university governance; student agency; student-centered learning; interdisciplinary research process

References

  • Almendra, R. & Christiaans, H. (2013). ‘Design thinking’: the Emperor’s new suit. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal: Annual Review. Volume 6. Champain, Illinois: Common Ground, 1-19. http://designprinciplesandpractices.com/.

  • Ast, F. (1808). Grundlinien der Grammatik, Hermeneutik und Kritik. Landshut: Jos. Thomann.Google Scholar

  • Battarbee, K., Fulton Suri, J. & Gibbs Howard, S. (2015). Empathy on the edge. Scaling and sustaining a human-centered approach in the evolving practice of design. Case Study. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar

  • Barsalou, L.W. (2017). Define design thinking. she ji The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (2), pp. 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.007Crossref

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Bracco, M. (2005). Empatia e neuroni specchio. Una riflessione fenomenologica ed etica. Comprendre, 15, 33-53. Retrieved from https://www.in-formazione-psicologia.com/bracco-mirror.pdf

  • Braun, E., Moreland, J., Sanders, E. & Gill, C. (2014). Designer in design thinking. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. 4 & 5 September 2014, University of Twente, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

  • Brauer, J. (2013). Empathie und historische Alteritätserfahrung, in: Brauer, J. & Lücke, M. (Hg.) (2013). Emotionen, Geschichte und historisches Lernen. Geschichtsdidaktische und Geschichtskulturelle Perspektiven. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 75-92.Google Scholar

  • Bremer, K. & Wirth, U. (2010). Die philologische Frage. Kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die Theoriegeschichte der Philologie. In: Texte zur modernen Philologie. Hg. von K. Bremer und U. Wirth. Stuttgart: Reclam, 2010, S. 10-47.Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, 84-92.Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8 (2), pp. 5-21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burdick, A. & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32, pp. 546-556. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.005CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Callahan, E. (2018) Cross-Cultural Empathy: Learning About Diverse Users in Design Thinking Process. In: Stephanidis C. (eds) HCI International 2018 – Posters' Extended Abstracts. HCI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 850. Springer, Cham, pp. 236-240. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92270-6_32Crossref

  • Camacho, M. (2018). An integrative model of design thinking. 21st DMI: Academic Design Management Conference. Next Wave, London, UK, 1-2 August, 2018, 627-641.Google Scholar

  • Canfora, L. (2008). Filologia e libertà. La più eversiva delle discipline, l’indipendenza di pensiero e il diritto alla verità. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar

  • Coyne, R. & Snodgrass, A. (1991). Is designing mysterious? Challenging the dual knowledge thesis. Design Studies 12 (3), pp. 124-131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cropley, A. (2006). In Praise of Convergent Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13Crossref

  • Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17 (3), pp. 49-55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Culén, A. L. & Gasparini, A. A. (2019). STEAM education: Why learn design thinking? In: Babaci-Wilhite, Z. (ed.). Promoting language and STEAM as human rights in education: science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics, Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 91-118.Google Scholar

  • CUN (2017). Guida alla scrittura degli ordinamenti didattici (A.A. 18/19). 09 novembre 2017 (versione aggiornata al 15 dicembre 2017).Google Scholar

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: a study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.Google Scholar

  • Diethelm, J. (2016). De-colonizing design thinking. she ji The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2 (2), pp. 166-172.Google Scholar

  • Diethelm, J. (2017). Embodied design thinking. Pp. 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35214088/Embodied_Design_Thinking

  • Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4-17.Google Scholar

  • Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, pp. 521-532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dilthey, W. (1900). Die Entstehung der Hermeneutik. In G. Misch (Hg.) (1924) Wilhelm Diltheys Gesammelte Schriften. V. Bd.: Die Geistige Welt. Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Erste Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften. Berlin: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 103-120.Google Scholar

  • ECTS Users’ Guide (2015). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2766/87192CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • EHEA (2018). Paris Communiqué, Appendix III. Retrieved From http://www.ehea.info/Upload/document/ministerial_declarations/EHEAParis2018_Communique_AppendixIII_952778.pdf

  • ESG (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Brussel, Belgium. Retrieved from https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf

  • ESU (2015). Bologna with students’ eyes. Overview on student-centred learning in higher education in Europe. Research study by European Students’ Union. Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.esu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Overview-on-Student-Centred-Learning-in-Higher-Education-in-Europe.pdf

  • ESU (2018). Bologna with students’ eyes. The final countdown. By European Students’ Union. Retrieved from https://www.esu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/BWSE-2018_web_Pages.pdf

  • Frodeman, R. & Mitcham, C. (2007). New directions in interdisciplinarity: broad, deep, and critical. Bullettin of Science, Technology & Society 27 (6), 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467607308284Crossref

  • Gasparini, A. A, (2014). The value of empathy in Design Thinking. In: Innovation in HCI: What can we learn from Design Thinking? Workshop. In conjunction with NORDICHI 2014, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar

  • Gasparini, A. A. (2015). Perspective and use of empathy in Design Thinking. In L. Miller & A. Culén (eds.), ACHI 2015: The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. February 22 - 27, Lisbon, Portugal. Wilmington, DE: IARIA, pp. 49-54.Google Scholar

  • Gasparini, A. A. & Culén, A. L. (2017). Temporality and innovation in digital humanities: the case of papyri from Tebtunis. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 34, pp. 161-184.Google Scholar

  • Goldschmidt, G. (2017). Design thinking: a method or a gateway into design cognition? she ji. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3 (2), pp. 107-112.Google Scholar

  • Harmsen, R. (2015) Future Scenarios for the European Higher Education Area: Exploring the Possibilities of “Experimentalist Governance”. In: Curaj A., Matei L., Pricopie R., Salmi J. & Scott P. (eds). The European Higher Education Area. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar

  • Haeffner, G. (2005): Philosophische Anthropologie. 4., überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage. Stuttgart; Berlin; Köln: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

  • Henriksen, D. (2017). Creating STEAM with design thinking: beyond STEM and arts integration. The STEAM Journal, 3 (1), article 11. DOI: 10.5642/steam.20170301.11CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henriksen, D., Richardson, C. & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: a creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, pp. 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001Crossref

  • Illeris, K. (2018). An overview of the history of learning theory. European Journal of Education, 53, 86–101. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12265CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacob, J. (2018). Intersections in design thinking and art thinking: towards interdisciplinary innovation. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 5(1), 4-25.Google Scholar

  • Jansen, E. & Goedhart, M. (2010). (Inter)disciplinary Dublin descriptors? Implementation of the Bologna process in a Dutch university. Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Perspectives and Practicalities. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, 5, 115-131.Google Scholar

  • Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J. & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22 (2), pp. 121-146.Google Scholar

  • Kelley, T, & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence. Unleashing the creative potential within us all. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

  • Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: part one. Design and Culture, 3 (3), pp 285–306.Google Scholar

  • Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: part two. Design and Culture, 4 (2), pp. 129-148.Google Scholar

  • Klemenčič, M. (2012), The changing conceptions of student participation in HE governance in the EHEA. In A. Curaj, Sir P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu & L. Wilson (eds.) European higher education at the crossroads – between the Bologna Process and national reforms, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 631-653.Google Scholar

  • Klemenčič, M. (2015). Student involvement in quality enhancement, in: J. Huisman, H. De Boer, D. Dill & M. Souto-Otero (Eds). The handbook of Higher Education policy and governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 526-543.Google Scholar

  • Klemenčič, M. (2017). From student engagement to student agency: conceptual considerations of European policies on student-centered learning in higher education. Special issue: Critical and alternative perspectives on student engagement, eds. Bruce Macfarlane and Michael Tomlinson. Higher Education Policy, 30 (1), pp. 69–85.Google Scholar

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C.S., Wong, B. & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education. Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Kolko, J. (2015). Design Thinking Comes of Age. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), pp. 66-71. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/design-thinking-comes-of-age

  • Köppen, E. & Meinel, C. (2015). Empathy via design thinking: creation of sense and knowledge. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C. & Leifer, L. (eds.). Design thinking research - building innovators. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06823-7_2Crossref

  • Kurokava, T. (2013). Design thinking education at universities and graduate schools. Quarterly Review, 46, pp. 50-62.Google Scholar

  • Liddel, H.G. & Scott, R. (1901). A Greek-English Lexicon. Eighth edition, revised throughout. New York et al.: American Book Company.Google Scholar

  • Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32 (6), 925-938.Google Scholar

  • Lindgaard, K. & Wesselius, H. (2017). Once more, with feeling: design thinking and embodied cognition. she ji The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3 (2), pp. 83-92.Google Scholar

  • Lipka, L. (2002). English lexicology. Lexical structure, word semantics and word-formation. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

  • Lor, R. (2017). Design thinking in education: a critical review of literature. IACSSM; ACEP, Conference Proceedings, Bangkok, Thailand, Mai 24-26, 2107, pp. 36-68.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Meffert, H., Gazzola, V., den Boer, J. A., Bartels, A. A. J., & Keysers, C., (2013). Reduced spontaneous but relatively normal deliberate vicarious representations in psychopathy. Brain, 136 (8), pp. 2550-2562.Google Scholar

  • Montanari, F. (2013), Vocabolario della lingua greca. Con la collaborazione di Ivan Galofaro e Daniela Manetti. Terza edizione. Torino: Loescher.Google Scholar

  • New, S. & Kimbell, L. (2013). Chimps, designers, consultants and empathy: a “theory of mind” for service design. 2nd Cambridge Academic Design Management Conference, 4 – 5 September 2013, pp. 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.lucykimbell.com/stuff/New_Kimbell_Empathy_2013.pdf

  • Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things. Revised and expanded edition. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Noweski, C., Scheer, A., Büttner, N., von Thienen, J., Erdmann, J. & Meinel, C. (2012). Towards a paradigm shift in education practice: developing twenty-first century skills with design thinking. In: H. Plattner, C. Meinel & L. Leifer (eds.). Design thinking research – measuring performance in context. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_5.Crossref

  • Nowak, M. (2011). The Complicated History of Einfühlung. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, 1 (2), pp. 301-326.Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought. The intelligence of emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge (MA) et al.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2, pp. 16-27.Google Scholar

  • Peels, R. (2018). Epistemic values in the humanities and in the sciences. History of Humanities, 3 (1), pp. 89-111.Google Scholar

  • Pollock, S. (2016). Philology and freedom. Philological Encounters, 1, 14-30. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/mesaas/faculty/directory/pollock_pub/Philology%20and%20Freedom.pdf

  • Poser, H. (2012). Wissenschaftstheorie. Eine philosophische Einführung. Zweite, überarbeite und erweiterte Auflage. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

  • Poulsen, S. B. & Thøgersen, U. (2011). Embodied design thinking: a phenomenological perspective, CoDesign, 7 (1), pp. 29-44, DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2011.563313CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • QF-EHEA 2005 (February 2005). A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Bologna Working Group on Qualifications Frameworks. Copenhagen: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Retrieved from http://ecahe.eu/w/index.php/Framework_for_Qualifications_of_the_European_Higher_Education_Area

  • Rapporto ANVUR, 23/2017: Accreditamento periodico delle Sedi e dei Corsi di Studio: Università degli Studi di Urbino “Carlo Bo”. Approvato dal Consiglio Direttivo il 05/09/2017. Doc. 23/2017.Retrieved from http://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Rapporto%20ANVUR_URBINO_2016.pdf

  • Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence. In T. Toshiharu & Y. Nagai (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010), 29 November – 1 December 2010, Kobe, Japan. Retrieved from https://www.designsociety.org/publication/30267/Design+Thinking%3A+An+Educational+Model+towards+Creative+Confidence

  • Razzouk, R. & Shute, V. (2012), What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research 82 (3), pp. 330-348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Recalcati, M. (2018). Ritratti del desiderio. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Schwindt, J. P. (Hg.) (2009). Was ist eine philologische Frage? Beiträge zur Erkundung einer theoretischen Einstellung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

  • Schwindt, J. P. (2017). Die Theorie der Philologie. Geschichte der Germanistik: Historische Zeitschrift für die Philologien. Hg. von C. König und M. Lepper. Doppelheft 51/52, pp. 74-82.Google Scholar

  • Sin, C. (2015). Teaching and learning: a journey (in The European Higher Education Area 2015)Google Scholar

  • Statuto dell’Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo (2018). Testo in vigore dal 30 novembre 2018. Retrieved from https://www.uniurb.it/ateneo/governance/statuto-e-regolamenti

  • Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity. Prospects and paradigms. In: Handbook of creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-15.Google Scholar

  • Szostak, R. (2003), “Comprehensive” curricular reform: providing students with a map of the scholarly enterprise. Journal of General Education, 52 (1), pp. 27-49.Google Scholar

  • Szostak, R. (2017), Interdisciplinary research as a creative design process, in F. Darbellay, Z. Moody & T. Lubart (eds.), Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 17-34.Google Scholar

  • Szostak, R. (2019). Manifesto of interdisciplinarity. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/ualberta.ca/manifesto-ofinterdisciplinarity/manifesto-of-interdisciplinarity

  • Suárez, I. C. & Suárez, L.V. (2005). The impact of the Bologna process on disciplinization. Comparative report. Retrieved from https://www.york.ac.uk/res/researchintegration/ComparativeReports/Comparative_Report_Bologna_effect.pdf

  • Tschimmel, L., Santos, J., Loyens, D., Jacinto, A., Monteiro, R. & Valença, M. (2015). Research report d-Think. Design thinking applied to education and training. ERASMUS+ KA 2 Strategic Partnerships. Matosinhos: ESAD.Google Scholar

  • Tschimmel, K. & Santos, J. (2018), Design thinking applied in higher education: D-Think, a European project for innovating educational systems, in: Carmo, M. (ed.), Education and New Developments 2018Proceedings of the National Conference on Education and New Developments (END 2018), organized by the World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (WIARS). Lisboa: inScience Press, pp. 209-213.Google Scholar

  • Verganti, R. (2016). Overcrowded. Designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas. Cambridge (MA), London (UK): The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Vetlesen, A. J. (1994). Perception, empathy, and judgment. An inquiry into the preconditions of moral performance. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

  • Withell, A. & Haigh, N. (2013). Developing design thinking expertise in higher education. CUMULUS 2013. 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers Oslo, 14–17 May 2013. Retrieved from https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/6326

  • Wolf, J. (2012). Kontinuität und Wandel der Philologien. Textarchäologische Studien zur Entstehung der Romanischen Philologie im 19. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

  • Wrigley, C. & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54 (4), 374-385. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214, pp. 374-385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zara, V. & Stefani, E. (2017). Istruzione, Attivazione e Accreditamento dei Corsi di Studio. Novità Introdotte da AVA 2.0 e dal DM 987/2016. Roma: Fondazione CRUI.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-02-28

Accepted: 2019-07-12

Published Online: 2019-09-10


Citation Information: Open Education Studies, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 24–52, ISSN (Online) 2544-7831, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0002.

Export Citation

© 2019 Alessandra Molinari et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in