Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Education Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Bastiaens, Theo

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2544-7831
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Making Pedagogic Sense of Design Thinking in the Higher Education Context

Gnanaharsha Beligatamulla
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Design, Queensland University of Technology (and Department of Integrated Design, University of Moratuwa – Sri Lanka), Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Janice Rieger
  • School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia; School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jill Franz
  • School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia; School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4000, Queensland, Australia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Megan Strickfaden
Published Online: 2019-10-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0006

Abstract

This paper explores the educator experience and sense-making of design thinking pedagogy in the higher education context. Design thinking has become a pedagogical phenomenon in higher education due to its widespread relevance across many disciplines. Some studies discuss design thinking as a pedagogy in the educational context; however, there is a lack of empirical research to understand the educator perspective on design thinking pedagogy. Three design thinking educators who have had more than fifteen years of teaching experience were interviewed to explore their experiences. The data from these individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews were analysed employing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). One super-ordinate theme; capability building for everyone, and four subordinate themes; developing a participatory approach towards world issues; developing an open, explorative attitude; developing creative ability; and developing an ethical mindset were identified. From these findings, the paper argues that design thinking educators have the basis for a pedagogical rationale that transcends disciplinary boundaries and provides common ground for collaboration and on-going development of design thinking pedagogy as an emerging field in education.

Keywords: Creative problem-solving; Design Thinking Pedagogy; teaching-learning-assessing; university education

References

  • Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2010). Basic Design 08: Design Thinking. Lausanne 6, Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.Google Scholar

  • Anderson, N., Adam, R., Petray, T., Taylor, P., Otto, T., Melles, G., … Wright, N. (2014). Design thinking frameworks as transformative cross-disciplinary pedagogy: Final Report. Sydney.Google Scholar

  • Bainger, L. (2011). Giving teachers a voice: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in music education research. Music Education Research and Innovation, 14(1), 32–39.Google Scholar

  • Beligatamulla, G. (2018). Design thinking for business and entrepreneurship: accelerating innovation in higher education in Sri Lanka. In International Conference on Business Research (pp. 29–38). Moratuwa: University of Moratuwa,. https://doi.org/10.31705/ICBR.2018.5Crossref

  • Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., & Franz, J. (2018). Does It Matter? Value of Reporting Both Successes and Failures of ‘Design Thinking’ in Higher Education. In The Twelfth International Conference on Design Principles & Practices (p. Virtual Lightning Talk). Barcelona: Common Ground Research Networks.Google Scholar

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637Crossref

  • Camacho, M. (2016). In Conversation David Kelley: From Design to Design Thinking at Stanford and IDEO. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.009Crossref

  • Cassim, F. (2013). Hands On, Hearts On, Minds On: Design Thinking within an Education Context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01752.xCrossref

  • Cerbone, D. R. (2015). Making Sense of Phenomenological Sense-Making: On Moore on Husserl. Philosophical Topics, 43(1&2), 1–16.Google Scholar

  • Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 604–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, K. (2017). Apply design thinking in higher education. Student Affairs Today, 20(5), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/say.30365Crossref

  • Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and Acting Like a Designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. San Francisco: WISE and IDEO.Google Scholar

  • Donar, A. (2011). Thinking Design and Pedagogy: An Examination of Five Canadian Post-Secondary Courses in Design Thinking. Canadian Review of Art Education, 38(1), 84–102.Google Scholar

  • Dong, A. (2008). The Policy of Design: A Capabilities Approach. Design Issues, 24(4), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.4.76Crossref

  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(January), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2006.1679078Crossref

  • Elliott, K., & Lodge, J. M. (2017). Engaging University Teachers in Design Thinking. In R. James, S. French, & P. Kelly (Eds.), Visions for Australian Tertiary Education (pp. 55–66). Melbourne: Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

  • Franz, J. (2019). Designing ‘Space’ for Student Wellbeing as Flourishing. In H. Hughes, J. Franz, & J. Willis (Eds.), School Spaces for Student Wellbeing and Learning (pp. 261–279). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6092-3_14Crossref

  • Gilbert, C. G., Crow, M. M., & Anderson, D. (2018). Design Thinking for Higher Education. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(1), 36–41.Google Scholar

  • Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (Eds.). (2017). Taking Design Thinking to School: How the Technology of Design Can Transform Teachers, Learners, and Classrooms. New York and London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

  • Grande, J. (2014). The Capability approach and design towards a practical approach based on lessons from Ethiopia. In DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations, University of Twente, The Netherlands (pp. 432–436).Google Scholar

  • Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Jackson, N., & Buining, F. (2011). Enriching Problem-based Learning through Design Thinking. In T. Barrett & S. Moore (Eds.), New Approaches to Problem-based Learning: Revitalising Your Practice in Higher Education (pp. 158–170). New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • Kirn, A., Huff, J. L., Godwin, A., Ross, M., & Cass, C. (2019). Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270Crossref

  • Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Association Press. Retrieved from http://libcat.library.qut.edu.au/record=b1344069&searchscope=8

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3Crossref

  • Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (Second edition). Upper Saddle River: New Jersey Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Koria, M. (2009). On Innovation and Capability: A Holistic View Philosophy of Management (Vol. 7). Retrieved from https://link-springer-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/content/pdf/10.5840%2Fpom20097230.pdf

  • Koria, M. (2015). Four Dimensions in Learning Design Thinking: Capabilities, Constraints, Collaboration, and the Diffusion of Ideas. Synnyt/Origins, Finnish Studies in Art Education, Special Is(2), 15–26.Google Scholar

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Calif: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Larkin, M., Shaw, R., & Flowers, P. (2018). Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540655Crossref

  • Leifer, L., & Meinel, C. (2015). Manifesto: Design thinking becomes foundational. In Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_1Crossref

  • Leong, B. D., & Clark, H. (2003). Culture-Based Knowledge Towards New Design Thinking and Practice-A Dialogue: Benny Ding Leong in conversation with Hazel Clark. Design Issues, 19(3), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603768290838Crossref

  • Liedtka, J., Salzman, R., & Azer, D. (2017). Design thinking for the greater good: Innovation in the social sector. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lloyd, P. (2013). Embedded creativity: Teaching design thinking via distance education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9214-8Crossref

  • Lockard, E. S., & Hargis, J. (2017). Andragogical Design Thinking: A Transition to Anarchy in and Beyond the Classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 10(3).Google Scholar

  • Luka, I. (2014). Design Thinking in Pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20142.63.74Crossref

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053690Crossref

  • ME310 Stanford University. (2010). ME310 Design Innovation at Stanford University. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from https://web.stanford.edu/group/me310/me310_2016/about.html

  • Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking Research. Design Thinking: Understand, Improve, Apply. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387667-6.00013-0Crossref

  • Morris, H. E., & Warman, G. (2015). Using Design Thinking in Higher Education. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/1/using-design-thinking-in-higher-education

  • Mortimore, P. (Ed.). (1999). Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London : Chapman.Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01053.xCrossref

  • Oxman, R. (1996). Cognition and design. Design Studies, 17(4), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)90000-9Crossref

  • Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00033-4Crossref

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Pipere, A., & Micule, I. (2014). Mathematical Identity for a Sustainable Future: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 5–31.Google Scholar

  • Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2015). Design thinking research: Making design thinking foundational. Design Thinking Research: Making Design Thinking Foundational. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1Crossref

  • Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies, 19(4), 389–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00015-5Crossref

  • Reid, K., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2005). Exploring lived experience. Psychologist, 18(1), 20–23.Google Scholar

  • Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372151Crossref

  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland.Google Scholar

  • Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659Crossref

  • Smith, J. A. (2018). Participants and researchers searching for meaning: conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540648Crossref

  • Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method, and research. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2010). Intepretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008a). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008b). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (pp. 229–254). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470776278.ch10Crossref

  • Stables, K. (2013). Designerly Well-being: Implications for pedagogy that develops design capability. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 19(1).Google Scholar

  • Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (1998). Capability and quality in higher education. Kogan Page.Google Scholar

  • Strickfaden, M., & Heylighen, A. (2010). Cultural Capital: A Thesaurus for Teaching Design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01653.xCrossref

  • Taheri, M., Unterholzer, T., & Meinel, C. (2016). Design Thinking At Scale: A Report on Best Practices of Online Courses. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research: Taking Breakthrough Innovation Home (pp. 217–235). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40382-3_13Crossref

  • Takeda, K. (2013). Design Thinking for Future Schools. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal, 49(4), 455–462.Google Scholar

  • Tovey, M. (Ed.). (2015). Design Pedagogy: Developments in Art and Design Education. Surrey and Burlington: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Tschimmel, K., Loyens, D., Soares, J., & Oraviita, T. (2017). D-Think Toolkit: Design Thinking Applied to Education and Training. ERASMUS+ and KA2 Strategic Partnerships Authors.Google Scholar

  • von Thienen, J., Ney, S., & Meinel, C. (2019). Estimator Socialization in Design Thinking: The Dynamic Process of Learning How to Judge Creative Work. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity, Creativity Theory and Action in Education 4 (pp. 67–99). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_5Crossref

  • von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design Thinking in Higher Education: How Students become Dedicated Creative Problem Solvers. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Creative Problem-Solving Skill Development in Higher Education (pp. 306–328). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0643-0.ch014Crossref

  • Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional Education, Capabilities and the Public Good: the role of universities in promoting human development. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

  • Walker, M., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (Eds.). (2017). Socially just pedagogies, capabilities and quality in higher education: Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/series/14625

  • Williams, W. A., & Rieger, J. (2015). A Design History of Design : Complexity, Criticality, and Cultural Competence. Design Studies in Canada (and Beyond), 40(2), 15–21. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.7202/1035392arCrossref

  • Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design Thinking pedagogy: the Educational Design Ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214Crossref

About the article

Received: 2019-03-01

Accepted: 2019-07-12

Published Online: 2019-10-23


Citation Information: Open Education Studies, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 91–105, ISSN (Online) 2544-7831, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0006.

Export Citation

© 2019 Gnanaharsha Beligatamulla et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in