Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Education Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Bastiaens, Theo

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2544-7831
See all formats and pricing
More options …

From Doing to Thinking: Developing the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Scaffold Assignments and Self-Regulated Learning Reflection

Lisa Bosman
Published Online: 2019-09-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0007

Abstract

Engineer, innovators, and designers play a critical role in the economy by addressing pressing problems and creating solutions that are new and innovative. It is a role that involves technical skills but also requires curiosity, an ability to connect pieces of knowledge to discover solutions, and a focus on value creation – which are all characteristic of the entrepreneurial mindset. There are many different design-focused frameworks that can be used to enhance the entrepreneurial mindset; this study focuses on four of them: systems thinking, design thinking, the value proposition canvas, and the business model canvas. The purpose of this paper is to highlight a new approach to developing the entrepreneurial mindset that goes beyond the proverbial “checking boxes” to providing an approach for demonstrating the integration of doing (artifact development) and thinking (reflection). This innovative and experimental approach offers two unique attributes. First, it is a scaffold in that instruction of each of the four modules builds on the other, further enhancing and grounding the learning experience. Second, students are required to continuously reflect on the process. This encourages students to think about learning in a holistic manner, allowing the ability to connect classroom learning with specific current and future utility. The findings suggest that students were able to recognize why the design-focused frameworks and learning activities were important outside of the classroom, particularly in relation to workforce preparation and securing future employment.

Keywords: self-regulated learning; reflection; food access; higher education; undergraduate

References

  • Andersen, A. (2001). Implementation of engineering product design using international student teamwork—to comply with future needs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 179-186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Autrey, J. L., Sieber, J., Siddique, Z., & Mistree, F. (2018). Leveraging Self-Assessment to Encourage Learning Through Reflection on Doing. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 708-722.Google Scholar

  • Bailey, R., & Szabo, Z. (2007). Assessing engineering design process knowledge. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 508.Google Scholar

  • Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California management review, 50(1), 25-56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Behm, M., Culvenor, J., & Dixon, G. (2014). Development of safe design thinking among engineering students. Safety Science, 63(C), 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.018CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beiler, M. R. O. (2015). Integrating innovation and entrepreneurship principles into the civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3).Google Scholar

  • Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. (2018). Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. (2019). Applying Authentic Learning through Cultivation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Engineering Classroom. Education Sciences, 9(1), 7.Google Scholar

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

  • Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.Google Scholar

  • Brush, C., Neck, H., & Greene, P. (2015). A practice-based approach to entrepreneurship education. Evolving Entrepreneurial Education: Innovation in the Babson Classroom, 35.Google Scholar

  • Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education. National Academy of Engineering - The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society.Google Scholar

  • Clark, R. M., & Mahboobin, A. (2018). Scaffolding to Support Problem-Solving Performance in a Bioengineering Lab—A Case Study. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 61(2), 109-118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: researchers’ views: University of York York.Google Scholar

  • Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791-820.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512-523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.Google Scholar

  • Eppes, T. A., Milanovic, I., & Sweitzer, H. F. (2012). Strengthening Capstone Skills in STEM Programs. Innovative Higher Education, 37(1), 3-10.Google Scholar

  • Estell, J. K., & Hurtig, J. (2006). Using rubrics for the assessment of senior design projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Excellence in Education.Google Scholar

  • Fisher, S., & Justwan, F. (2018). Scaffolding Assignments and Activities for Undergraduate Research Methods. Journal of Political Science Education, 14(1), 63-71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • García-Rodríguez, F. J., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., & Ruiz-Rosa, I. (2017). The Business Model Approach in Entrepreneurship Education: Impact on Undergraduates′ Enterprise Potential. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 11-17.Google Scholar

  • Gerhart, A. L., Carpenter, D. D., Fletcher, R. W., & Meyer, E. G. (2014). Combining discipline-specific introduction to engineering courses into a single multi-discipline course to foster the entrepreneurial mindset with entrepreneurially minded learning. In.Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, L. A., Gross, D. S., & Kreutz, K. J. (2018). Developing undergraduate students’ systems thinking skills with an InTeGrate module. Journal of Geoscience Education, 1-16. doi:10.1080/10899995.2018.1529469CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, D. E., & Somerville, M. (2014). A whole new engineer.Google Scholar

  • Guerra, R. C. C., Smith, K. A., McKenna, A. F., Swan, C., Korte, R., Jordan, S., ... MacNeal, R. (2014). Innovation corps for learning: Evidence-based entrepreneurship to improve STEM education. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.Google Scholar

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2002). Cultivating a global mindset. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 116-126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanson, J. H., & Williams, J. M. (2008). Using writing assignments to improve self-assessment and communication skills in an engineering statics course. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 515-529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hathcock, S., Dickerson, D., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM Activity. Research in science education, 45(5), 727-748. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9437-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of business venturing, 25(2), 217-229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., Allen, R. D., & Mullineux, G. (2002). A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. International journal of information management, 22(4), 263-280.Google Scholar

  • Hiller Connell, K. Y., Remington, S. M., & Armstrong, C. M. (2012). Assessing systems thinking skills in two undergraduate sustainability courses: a comparison of teaching strategies. Journal of Sustainability Education, 3.Google Scholar

  • Hoveskog, M., Halila, F., & Danilovic, M. (2015). Early Phases of Business Model Innovation: An Ideation Experience Workshop in the Classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(2), 177-195. doi:10.1111/dsji.12061CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, W. A., Hixson, C. A., Mason, T. W., Brackin, P., Bunch, R. M., Dee, K. C., & Livesay, G. A. (2014). The Innovation Canvas in entrepreneurship education: Integrating themes of design, value, and market success. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 80-99.Google Scholar

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In Design Thinking for Education (pp. 1-15): Springer.Google Scholar

  • Kudrowitz, B. M., & Wallace, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(2), 120-139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leschke, J. (2013). Business model mapping: Application and experience in an introduction to entrepreneurship course. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16, 77-92.Google Scholar

  • Liening, A., Geiger, J.-M., Kriedel, R., & Wagner, W. (2016). Complexity and Entrepreneurship: Modeling the Process of Entrepreneurship Education with the Theory of Synergetics. In E. S. C. Berger & A. Kuckertz (Eds.), Complexity in Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Technology Research: Applications of Emergent and Neglected Methods (pp. 93-115). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284): Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar

  • McNeal, K. S., Libarkin, J. C., Ledley, T. S., Bardar, E., Haddad, N., Ellins, K., & Dutta, S. (2014). The Role of Research in Online Curriculum Development: The Case of EarthLabs Climate Change and Earth System Modules. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 560-577. doi:10.5408/13-060.1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.Google Scholar

  • Patel, S., & Mehta, K. (2017). Systems, Design, and Entrepreneurial Thinking: Comparative Frameworks. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(5), 515-533. doi:10.1007/s11213-016-9404-5CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ranger, B. J., & Mantzavinou, A. (2018). Design thinking in development engineering education: A case study on creating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world. Development Engineering, 3, 166-174. doi:10.1016/j.deveng.2018.06.001CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012a). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).Google Scholar

  • Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012b). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in Education. Design and Technology Education, 17(3), 8-19.Google Scholar

  • Seddon, J., & Caulkin, S. (2007). Systems thinking, lean production and action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 4(1), 9-24.Google Scholar

  • Seidel, V. P., & Fixson, S. K. (2013). Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 19-33.Google Scholar

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.Google Scholar

  • Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar

  • Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding Critical Thinking in the Zone of Proximal Development. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(3), 317-328. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.489237CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Welker, A. L., Sample-Lord, K. M., & Yost, J. R. (2017). Weaving entrepreneurially minded learning throughout a civil engineering curriculum. In (Vol. 2017-).Google Scholar

  • Wheadon, J., & Duval-Couetil, N. (2016). Elements of entrepreneurially minded learning: KEEN white paper. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship(7(3)), 17-25.Google Scholar

  • Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-01-28

Accepted: 2019-07-12

Published Online: 2019-09-30


Citation Information: Open Education Studies, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 106–121, ISSN (Online) 2544-7831, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0007.

Export Citation

© 2019 Lisa Bosman, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in