Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Education Studies

Editor-in-Chief: Bastiaens, Theo

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Re-imagining the Pedagogical Paradigm Within a Technology Mediated Learning Environment

Ken Brown / Viola Larionova / Natalia Stepanova / Vic Lally
Published Online: 2019-11-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0009


Traditional didactic pedagogies employed within the culture of the Russian higher education system precluded students’ engagement with problems which were described as generating dissonances in learning cognition. Addressing issues of dissonance within the higher education learning sphere requires re-imagining the educational culture. Re-imagining provides an opportunity to promote new approaches to learning through alternative affordances; one such affordance is technology mediated learning.

Pedagogical re-design within an alternative learning paradigm requires deep understanding of the problems associated with the previous paradigm. Re-imagined pedagogical scope for exploration of the professional, learning, cultural, institutional and technical aspects expand the knowledge base beyond the didactic towards an engaging student-centered ethos using open education and gamification.

To address issues of learning, culture, technology, and institution, a convergent mixed methods design using student questionnaires and academic interviews alongside performance observations was employed. The research study examined the re-imagining of the educational culture to promote new approaches to learning through the affordances of technology mediated learning within a constructivist, critical realism epistemology using thematic analysis.

The re-imagined pedagogical design within a technology mediated learning environment demonstrates a cultural shift towards an engaging and supportive educational experience. The lessons learned may be applied in other higher educational contexts.

Keywords: e-learning; open education; student engagement; technology mediated learning; gamification


  • Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of a constructivist learning environment to academic self-efficacy in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 18(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9174-5Crossref

  • Blum, D. W. (2006). Russian Youth Policy: Shaping the Nation-State’s Future. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 26(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2006.0027Crossref

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462Crossref

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. SAGE.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, K., & Lally, V. (2017, April 26). Myths, rhetoric and opportunities surrounding new teaching technologies: Engineering mathematics education. Presented at the EDCrunch, Yekaterinburg, Russia.Google Scholar

  • Brown, K., Larionova, V. A., & Lally, V. (2018). Lifelong learning as a tool for the development of smart cities: technology enhanced learning as an enabler. R-Economy, 4(4), 133–143. https://doi.org/doi: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.4.018CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bystrova, T. Yu., Larionova, V. A., Osborne, M., & Platonov, A. M. (2015). Introduction of open e-learning system as a factor of regional development. R-Economy, 1(4), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2015.4.021Crossref

  • Charteris, J., Quinn, F., Parkes, M., Fletcher, P., & Reyes, V. (2016). e-Assessment for learning and performativity in higher education: A case for existential learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2595Crossref

  • Czerniewicz, L. (2018). Inequality as higher education Goes Online. In Dohn, N. B., Cranmer, S., Sime, J. A., deLaat, M., & Ryberg (Eds). Networked Learning: Reflections and Challenges. NY: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental Changes in Memorization Processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 324–340.Google Scholar

  • Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333–2351.Google Scholar

  • Kochetkov, D., & Larionova, V. (2016). The Changing Role of Universities in Economic Growth. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 389–397.Google Scholar

  • Larionova, V., Semenova, T., Bystrova, T., & Tretyakov, V. (2018). Models of using MOOCS in higher education: Organization and Finance effects. INTED2018 Proceedings, 9223–9229. Retrieved from https://library.iated.org/view/LARIONOVA2018MOD

  • Larionova, V., Brown, K., Bystrova, T., & Sinitsyn, E. (2018). Russian perspectives of online learning technologies in higher education: An empirical study of a MOOC. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918763420Crossref

  • Mattar, J. (2018). Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20055Crossref

  • Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education, 71, 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011Crossref

  • Ni Shuilleabhain, A., Meehan, M., Cronin, A., & Howard, E. (2016, August 23). Transitions in mathematics education: Investigating students’ sense of belonging in post-primary and university mathematical learning. Presented at the UCD, Dublin. Retrieved from https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/21/contribution/37704/

  • Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ Need for Belonging in the School Community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170786Crossref

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543Crossref

  • Pogosian, V. (2012). Russian Educational Policy: Two Different Eras. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(1), 274–304. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2012-1-11Crossref

  • Presseisen, B. Z., & Kozulin, A. (1992). Mediated Learning--The Contributions of Vygotsky and Feuerstein in Theory and Practice. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED347202

  • Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the Definition of Feedback. Behavioural Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x02239569Crossref

  • Schumann, J. H., Wünderlich, N. V., & Wangenheim, F. (2012). Technology mediation in service delivery: A new typology and an agenda for managers and academics. Technovation, 32(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.002Crossref

  • Seabi, J. (2012). Feuerstein’s Mediated Learning Experience as a Vehicle for Enhancing Cognitive Functioning of Remedial School Learners in South Africa. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 12, 35–45. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1002245

  • Sinitsyn, E., Tolmachev, A., Larionova, V. A., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2019). Mathematical models of learning analytics for massive open online courses. Presented at the Edulearn, Palma.Google Scholar

  • Smith, J. (2013). An investigation in the use of collaborative metacognition during mathematical problem solving. A case study with a primary five class in Scotland (PhD, University of Glasgow). Retrieved from http://encore.lib.gla.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3008174

  • Sorrell, S. (2018). Explaining sociotechnical transitions: A critical realist perspective. Research Policy, 47(7), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.008Crossref

  • Stepanova, N., Davy, Y., Bochkov, P., & Larionova, V. A. (2017). Game-Based Management for Students: Ural Federal University Taken as Example. Retrieved 3 June 2019, from https://search.proquest.com/openview/c1aa102caeb5cecdcb94321e5e7ec0c7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=396495

  • Stepanova, N., Larionova, V., Davy, Y., & Brown, K. (2018). Effect of Using Game-Based Methods on Learning Efficiency: Teaching Management to Engineers. European Conference on Games Based Learning, 660–XXV. Academic Conferences International Limited.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change. Retrieved from Higher Education Academy website: https://www.phf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/What-Works-report-final.pdf

  • Trull, R. E. (2015). Discerning worldviews: Pedagogical models for conceptualizing worldview distances. Missiology: An International Review, 43(4), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829615595830Crossref

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. S. Jogn-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001Crossref

About the article

Received: 2019-06-17

Accepted: 2019-09-17

Published Online: 2019-11-01

Citation Information: Open Education Studies, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 138–145, ISSN (Online) 2544-7831, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0009.

Export Citation

© 2019 Ken Brown et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in