Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Journal of Scandinavian Studies

Ed. by Böldl, Klaus / Rühling, Lutz / van der Liet, Henk

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.02

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.188

Online
ISSN
2191-9402
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Rettslig formgivingsarbeid etter terroren 22. juli 2011

Ingvild Folkvord
Published Online: 2016-06-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ejss-2016-0008

Abstract

The article focuses on some of the unprecedented forms of judicial practices that emerged during the trial of Anders Behring Breivik in Oslo City Court in Norway after the terror attacks perpetrated on July 22 2011. Embracing an interpretive point of view mainly inspired by the philosopher Ernst Cassirer, the article sheds light on various performative practices and shows how they contribute to giving the catastrophic event a specific form. In this perspective the law can be framed as a process through which the distinction between the lawful and the unlawful gradually is established and recognized by the parties involved.

Litteratur

  • Anker, Trine / Marie von der Lippe 2015: «Når terror ties i hjel – en diskusjon om 22. juli og demokratisk medborgerskap i skolen». I: Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, nr. 2. 87–96.Google Scholar

  • Ball, Milner S. 1975: «The Play’s the Thing. An Unscientific Reflection on Courts under the Rubrics of Theater». I: Stanford Law Review, vol. 28, nr. 1. 81–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boucht, Johan 2015: «Om strafferettslig tilregnelighet i norsk rett». I: Lov og rett, vol. 51, 9. 515–532.Google Scholar

  • Cassirer, Ernst 1998–2009: Werke (28 bd). Red. av Birgit Recki. Hamburg.Google Scholar

  • Conley, John M. / William M. O’Barr 1990: Rules versus Relationships. Chicago / London.Google Scholar

  • Coskun, Deniz 2007: Law as Symbolic Form. Ernst Cassirer and the Anthropocentric View of Law. Dordrecht.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Derrida, Jacques 2000: Demeure. Fiction and Testimony, oversatt fra fransk av Elizabeth Rottenberg og utgitt sammen med Maurice Blanchots The Instant of my Death. Stanford. 13–103.Google Scholar

  • Folkvord, Ingvild 2012: «Ernst Cassirer and Bertolt Brecht on Technology, Expressivity and Democracy». I: Hoel, Aud Sissel / Ingvild Folkvord (red.): Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology. Basingstoke. 161–180.Google Scholar

  • Garapon, Antoine 1975: «Judges Nonverbal behavior in Jury trials: A Threat to Judicial Impartiality». I: Virginia Law Review, vol. 61, nr. 6. 1266–1298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garapon, Antoine 1997: Bien juger. Essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Paris.Google Scholar

  • Gere, Charlie 2007: «Reading the Traces». I: Michael Allen (red.): Reading CSI. Crime TV under the Microscope, London / New York. 129–140.Google Scholar

  • Gjelsvik, Anne 2016: «Mellom ordene og bildene. Forsøk på å begripe 22. juli». I: Eliassen m. fl. (red): Litteratur og terror. Volden, politikken og estetikken. Oslo. 217–232.Google Scholar

  • Hägerström, Axel 1965: Recht, Pflicht und bindende Kraft des Vertrages: nach römischer und naturrechtlicher Anschauung (red. Karl Olivecrona). Stockholm. [1939].Google Scholar

  • Huizinga, Johan 1956: Homo Ludens. Der Ursprung der Kultur im Spiel, oversatt fra nederlandsk til tysk av H. Nachod. Hamburg.Google Scholar

  • Hverven, Tom Egil / Sverre Malling 2013: Terrorens ansikt. Skisser fra 22. juli-rettssaken. Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Jordheim, Helge 2013: «22.juli-minnesmerker. Hvilke, hvor og hvorfor?». I: Aaagedal, Olaf / Pål Ketil Botcar / Ida Marie Høeg (red): Den offentlige sorgen. Oslo. 21–-238.Google Scholar

  • Kahn, Paul W. 1999: The Cultural Study of Law. Reconstructing Legal Scholarship. Chicago / London.Google Scholar

  • Knausgård, Karl Ove 2011: «Navnet og tallet». I: Eirik Ingebrigtsen / Gunstein Bakke (red.): Respons 22 / 7. Oslo. 141–161.Google Scholar

  • Koschorke, Albrecht 2012: Wahrheit und Erfindung. Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Erzähltheorie. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

  • Lassègue, Jean 2013: Semiotic anthropology and Cassirer’s legacy. Göteborg.Google Scholar

  • Lauschke, Marion 2012: «‘Representation’ and ‘Presence’ in the Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer». I: Hoel, Aud Sissel / Ingvild Folkvord (red.): Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology. Basingstoke. 181–199.Google Scholar

  • Löden, Hans 2014: «Peace, love, depoliticisation and the domestic alien: national identity in the memorial messages collected after the terror attacks in Norway 22 July 2011». I: National Identities, vol. 16, nr. 2. 157–176.Google Scholar

  • McLuhan, Marshall 1995: Understanding Media. Routledge. [1964].Google Scholar

  • Nicol, Andrew m. fl. (2009) (red): Media Law & Human Rights. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Saks, Michael J. 1982: «Innovation and Change in the Courtroom». I: Kerr, Norbert L. (red.): The Psychology of the Courtroom. London. 325–353.Google Scholar

  • Sanders, Mark 2007: Ambiguities of Witnessing. Law and Literature in the Time of a Truth Commission. Stanford.Google Scholar

  • Schau, Kristopher 2012: Rettsnotater 22. juli-rettssaken, Oslo Tinghus 2012. Oslo.Google Scholar

  • Vold, Tonje 2012: «Å holde fast 22, juli. Rettssaken, traumet og de personlige fortellingene»: I: Samtiden, nr. 3. 5–19.Google Scholar

Andre kilder

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-03

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: European Journal of Scandinavian Studies, Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 120–136, ISSN (Online) 2191-9402, ISSN (Print) 2191-9399, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ejss-2016-0008.

Export Citation

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in