Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Ekológia (Bratislava)

The Journal of Institute of Landscape Ecology of Slovak Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.137
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.148

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Protection of a Landscape Park’s Area in The Spatial Extent of Impact of the Poznan Agglomeration, Midwestern Poland

Beata Raszka
  • Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Department of Spatial Management, Grunwaldzka 55 Street, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Science, Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Department of Spatial Econometrics, Dzięgielowa 27 Street, 61-680 Poznan, Poland;
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Eliza Kalbarczyk
  • Corresponding author
  • Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Department of Spatial Management, Grunwaldzka 55 Street, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Science, Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Department of Spatial Econometrics, Dzięgielowa 27 Street, 61-680 Poznan, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2015-0026


This paper points out possibilities for limiting anthropic pressure in the Puszcza Zielonka Landscape Park in Poland. Based on the identification and evaluation of the most precious fragments of the environment, it determines the attractiveness of the park perceived as a complex multi- -ecosystem. It also identifies the main spatial problems and symptoms of anthropic pressure. The evaluation was conducted through establishing zones with similar environmental value and the determination of hemeroby indicators. The following basic problems were identified: recreational buildings and the development of settlements, cessation of agricultural production, further division of arable land into smaller plots in the buffer zone, combined with a change of land use. The final result of this research is a map of the functional and spatial division of the park, allowing for its protective, biocenotic and scientific functions and possible use for recreation in line with the principles of sustainable development. We ascertained that the strategic objectives and criteria for shaping spatial structures of protected areas should be included in the local spatial policy.

Keywords: anthropic pressure; functional division; sustainable development; spatial planning


  • Amend, T., Brown, J., Kothari, A., Phillips, A. & Stolton S. (Eds.) (2008). Protected landscapes and agrobiodiversity values. Vol. 1. Values of protected landscapes and seascapes. Heidelberg: Kasparek Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Angeles, M.T. (2001). A Peruvian perspective on protected landscapes as a tool for highlands conservation and stewardship.Landscape conservation. Vermont: Conservation Study Institute, IUCN, Woodstock.Google Scholar

  • Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plann., 67, 9-26. doi : 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartkowski, T. (1974). Applications of physical geography (in Polih). Warszawa-Poznań: PWN.Google Scholar

  • Berry, B.J.L. (1976). Urbanization and counterurbanization. Beverly Hills, London, Urban Affairs Annual Reviews 11, Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Brown, J. (2001). Stewardship of Andean landscapes: a potential role for category V protected areas. In Landscape conservation (pp. 35−37). Vermont: Conservation Study Institute.Google Scholar

  • Brown, D.L. & Schafft K.A. (2002). Population deconcentration in Hungary during the post-socialist transformation.Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 233-244. doi : 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00046-8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J., Mitchell, N. & Beresford M. (Eds.) (2005). The protected landscape approach: Linking nature, culture and community. Cambridge: IUCN.Google Scholar

  • Champion, T. (2005). The counterurbanisation cascade in England and Wales since 1991: the evidence of a new migration dataset. Belgeo, 1−2, 85-101.Google Scholar

  • Coombes, M., Dalla Longa, R. & Raybould S. (1989). Counterurbanisation in Britain and Italy: a comparative critique of the concept, causation and evidence. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

  • Dabrowska-Prot, E. (1995). Ecological importance of ecotones between forests and crop fields - a synthesis. Ekol. Pol., 43, 135-144.Google Scholar

  • DeFries, R., Karanth, K.K. & Pareeth S. (2010). Interactions between protected areas and their surroundings in humandominated tropical landscapes. Biol. Conserv., 143, 2870-2880. doi : 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dudley, N. & Stolton S. (Eds.) (2012). Protected landscapes and wild biodiversity. Vol. 3. Values of protected landscapes and seascapes. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar

  • Ervin, J. (2003). Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. Bioscience, 53, 833-841. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0833:RAOPAM]2.0.CO;2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fielding, A.J. (1982). Counterurbanisation in Western Europe. Progress in Planning, 17(1), 3-52. doi : 10.1016/0305-9006(82)90006-X.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forman, R.T.T. (1995). Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hayes, T.M. (2006). Parks, people and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development, 34(12), 2064-2075. doi : 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hernik, J., Gawroński, K. & Dixon-Gough R. (2013). Social and economic conflicts between cultural landscapes and rural communities in the English and Polish systems. Land Use Policy, 30, 800-813. doi : 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2012.06.006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, M.O., Roy, D.B. & Thompson K. (2002). Hemeroby, urbanity and ruderality: bioindicators of disturbance and human impact. J. Appl. Ecol., 39(5), 708−720. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00746.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • IUCN (1994). Guidelines for protected area management categories. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar

  • Jalas, J. (1955). Hemerobe und hemerochoer Pflanzenarten. Ein terminologoscher Reformversuch. Acta Societatia Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 72(11), 1-15.Google Scholar

  • Kasprzak, K. & Raszka B. (2006). Protection of area the Zielonka Forest Landscape Park (in Polish). Ekonomia i Środowisko, 2(30), 140-164.Google Scholar

  • Kundrata, M. & Huškova B. (2005). Sustaining rural landscapes and building civil society: experience from Central Europe. In J. Brown, N. Mitchell & M. Beresford (Eds.), The protected landscape approach: Linking nature, culture and community (pp. 131-146). Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar

  • La Rosa, D., Privitera, R., Martinico, F. & La Greca P. (2013). Measures of safeguard and rehabilitation for landscape protection planning: A qualitative approach based on diversity indicators. J. Environ. Manag., 127(Suppl.), S73- S83. doi : 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindner, M., Maroschek, M., Netherer, S., Kremer, A., Barbati, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Seidl, R., Delzon, S., Corona, P., Kolstrom, M., Lexer, M.J. & Marchetti M. (2010). Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manag., 259, 698-709. doi : 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loffler, R. & Steinicke E. (2006). Counterurbanization and its socioeconomic effects in High Mountain Areas of the Sierra Nevada (California/Nevada). Mt. Res. Dev., 26(1), 64-71. DOI: 10.1659/0276-4741(2006)026[0064:CAISE I]2.0.CO;2 .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Łowicki, D. (2008). Land use changes in Poland during transformation: case study of Wielkopolska Region. Landsc. Urban Plann., 87, 279-288. doi : 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson E.O. (2001). The theory of Island biogeography. Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mallarach, J.M. (Ed.) (2008). Protected landscapes and cultural and spiritual values. Vol. 2. Values of protected landscapes and seascapes. Heidelberg: Kasparek Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Mancinelli, R., Campiglia, E., Caporali, F. & Di Felice V. (2010). Habitat patch diversity evaluation for sustainability: a case study of a rural area in central Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 5(4), 341-352. DOI: 10.4081/ija.2010.341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mcdonald, R.I., Kareiva, P. & Forman R.T.T. (2008). The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv., 141, 1695-1703. doi : 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mcdonald, R.I., Forman, R.T.T., Kareiva, P., Neugarten, R., Salzer, D. & Fisher J. (2009). Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world. Landsc. Urban Plann., 93, 63-75. doi : 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mizgajski, A., Brodka, S., Fagiewicz, K., Kijowska, J., Łowicki, D., Markuszewska, I. & Poniży L. (2010). Natural conditions as a premise for the development of the Poznań urbanised area. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, 28, 91-100.Google Scholar

  • Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M., Guzman-Alvarez, J.R, Clavero-Rumbao, I. & Ceaceros C. (2013). A spatial pattern analysis of landscape changes between 1956-1999 of Pinus halepensis Miller plantations in Montes de Malaga State Park (Andalusia, Spain). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 11(2), 293−311.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, A. (2001). Protected landscape - a protected areas model for the 21st century. In Landscape conservation (pp. 50-51). Vermont: Conservation Study Institute.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, A. & Partington R. (2005). Protected landscapes in the United Kingdom. In J. Brown, N. Mitchell & M. Beresford (Eds.), The protected landscape approach: Linking nature, culture and community (pp. 118-130). Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar

  • Raszka, B. (2002). The introduction of spatial order in Puszcza Zielonka Landscape Park and Powidzki Landscape Park (in Polish). In K. Zimniewicz (Ed.), Management of a landscape park in the conditions of sustainable development. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej.Google Scholar

  • Regulation No. 4/05 of the Wielkopolska Province Governor of 18 April 2005 on the Protection of the Puszcza Zielonka Landscape Park (2005). Official Journal of the Wielkopolska Voivodeship 49, item. 1527.Google Scholar

  • Resolution No. XLVI/690/10 of the Regional Parliament of the Wielkopolska Province of 26 April 2010 on adopting amendment in the Spatial Development Plan of the Wielkopolska Province (2010), Poznań (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • Salvati, L., Sateriano, A. & Zitti M. (2013). Long-term land cover changes and climate variations - A country-scale approach for a new policy target. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 401-407. doi : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skokanova, H. & Eremiašova R. (2013). Landscape functionality in protected and unprotected areas: case studies from the Czech Republic. Ecological Informatics, 14, 71-74. doi : 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.11.007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Solon, J. (2009). Spatial context of urbanization: Landscape pattern and changes between 1950 and 1990 in the Warsaw metropolitan area, Poland. Landsc. Urban Plann., 93(3-4), 250-261. not in the text doi : 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2009.07.012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sołowiej, D. (1992). Fundamentals of environmental assessment methodology (in Polish). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar

  • Southworth, J., Nagendra, H. & Munroe D.K. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Are parks working? Exploring human-environment tradeoffs in protected area conservation. Applied Geography, 26, 87-95. doi : 10.1016/j. apgeog.2005.11.001. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spatial Development Plan of the Wielkopolska Province (2010). Wielkopolskie Biuro Planowania Przestrzennego, Poznań (in Polish).Google Scholar

  • Stockdale, A. & Barker A. (2009). Sustainability and the multifunctional landscape: An assessment of approaches to planning and management in the Cairngorms National Park. Land Use Policy, 26, 479-492. doi : 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2008.07.001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Švajda, J. (2011). Evaluation of integrated protected area management in Slovak national parks. Ekológia (Bratislava), 30(1), 141−155. DOI: 10.4149/ekol_2011_01_141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verburg, P.H., Overmars, K.P., Huigen, M.G.A., de Groot, W.T. & Veldkamp A. (2006). Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines. Applied Geography, 26, 153-173. doi : 10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolski, P., Kistowski, M., Cieszewska, A. & Kaliszuk E. (2000). Landscape structure and spatial planning - relations and conflicts. 3rd International Workshop on Sustainable Land Use Planning. Wageningen.Google Scholar

  • Wyman, M.S. & Stein T.V. (2010). Modeling social and land-use/land-cover change data to assess drivers of smallholder deforestation in Belize. Applied Geography, 30(3), 329-342. doi : 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziarnek, M. (2007). Human impact on plant communities in urban area assessed with hemeroby grades. Pol. J. Ecol., 55(1), 161−167. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-09-01

Published in Print: 2015-09-01

Citation Information: Ekológia (Bratislava), Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 268–280, ISSN (Online) 1337-947X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2015-0026.

Export Citation

© by Eliza Kalbarczyk. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in