Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
NEW AT DE GRUYTER

Elenchos

Journal of Studies on Ancient Thought

Ed. by Alesse, Francesca / Chiaradonna, Riccardo / Spinelli, Emidio

Editorial Board: Aronadio, Francesco / Berti, Enrico / Brancacci, Aldo / Centrone, Bruno / Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda / Dorandi, Tiziano / Ioppolo, Anna Maria / Opsomer, Jan / Rashed, Marwan / Reydams-Schils, Gretchen / Sedley, David


CiteScore 2018: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.111
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.522

Online
ISSN
2037-7177
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Passione e immaginazione in Lucrezio: il caso dell’inganno onirico

Francesca G. Masi
Published Online: 2018-11-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2018-0016

Abstract

Lucretius devotes some sections of his De rerum natura to the treatment of dreams. He is particularly interested in the phenomenon of dream deception, namely the belief that the dreamt object is the object itself. This psychological phenomenon has some both unwanted and philosophically interesting implications. Firstly, from an ethical point of view, it can stimulate uncontrolled worries and feelings in the dreamer that undermine his/her mental tranquility and health. Secondly, from a physiological perspective, it seems to reveal a failure in the mechanism undergoing the formation of mental representation. Thirdly, from the epistemological point of view, it seems to compromise the veracity of mental representations. This paper aims to explain how Lucretius dealt with this phenomenon. In particular, it will show how he succeeded, on the one hand, to explain the nature and the origin of dream deception and of its emotional aspect, and, on the other hand, to preserve the informative contents of dreams and their correspondence to reality. For this purpose the present essay will address the following issues: (1) which is the condition of the soul and of the mind while sleeping; (2) what kind of mental activity is dreaming; (3) which is the nature and the origin of the simulacra responsible for dreams; (4) which is the contents of dreams and how dream deception comes about; (5) and finally why and how dream deception emotionally effects the dreamer.

Keywords: Lucretius; dream; simulacra; dream deception; affections

Bibliografia

  • Asmis, E. 1981. “Lucretius’ Explanation of Moving Dream Figures at 4.768–76”, American Journal of Philology 102, 138‒145.Google Scholar

  • Avotins, I. 1980. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists”, Classical Quarterly 33, 429–454.Google Scholar

  • Bailey, C. 1926. Epicurus. The Extant Remains, edited by C. Bailey, Oxford, Oxford Clarendon Press [rist. Hildesheim–New York, Olms, 1970].Google Scholar

  • Cavini, W. 2009. “Phantasma: L’immagine onirica come apparenza illusoria nel pensiero greco del sogno”, Medicina nei secoli. Arte e Scienza. Journal of History of Medicine 21, 737–772.Google Scholar

  • Clay, D. 1988. “An Epicurean Interpretation of Dreams”, in D. Clay, Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 211–231.Google Scholar

  • Corti, A. 2015. “  ̔Ομοιοσχήμων e ὁμοιόμορφος. Alcune riflessioni sulle proprietà degli εἵδωλα”, in Masi–Maso (2015) 83–105.Google Scholar

  • DeWitt, N. W. 1939. “Epicurus, Περὶ φαντασίας”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 70, 414–427.Google Scholar

  • Diano, C. 1974. “La psicologia d’Epicuro e la teoria delle passioni”, in C. Diano, Scritti epicurei, Firenze, Olschki, 129–280.Google Scholar

  • Everson, S. 1999. “Epicurean Psychology”, in K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, M. Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 542–559.Google Scholar

  • Gigandet, A. 2015. “L’âme défaite: la théorie du sommeil dans l’Épicurisme”, in V. Leroux, N. Palmieri et C. Pigne, Le sommeil. Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, Paris, Honoré Champion Editeur, 85–96.Google Scholar

  • Gigandet, A. 2017. “Diogène, Lucrèce et la théorie épicurienne de l’imaginaire. Fragment 9 – De rerum natura IV 971–993”, in Hammerstaedt–Morel–Güremen (2017) 207–220.Google Scholar

  • Godwin, J. 1986. Lucretius. De Rerum Natura IV, Edited with Translation and Commentary, Warminster, Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar

  • Gordon, P. 1996. Epicurus in Lycia. The Second–Century World of Diogenes of Oenoanda, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Gourinat, J.–B. 2017. “La critique des stoïciens dans l’inscription d’Œnoanda”, in Hammerstaedt–Morel–Güremen (2017) 165–185.Google Scholar

  • Guidorizzi, G. 2013. Il compagno dell’anima. I Greci e il sogno, Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar

  • Güremen, R. 2017. Diogenes of Oinoanda and the Epicurean Epistemology of Dreams, in Hammerstaedt–Morel–Güremen (2017) 187–205.Google Scholar

  • Hammerstaedt, J., Morel, P.M., Güremen, R. 2017. Diogenes of Oinoanda: Epicureanism and Philosophical Debates, Leuven, Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kerferd, G. B. 1971. “Epicurus’ Doctrine of the Soul”, Phronesis 16, 80–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Konstan, D. 2007. Lucrezio e la psicologia epicurea, Milano, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar

  • Konstan, D. 2008. A Life Worthy of the Gods. The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus, Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens, Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Lapini, W. 2015. L’Epistola a Erodoto e il Bios di Epicuro in Diogene Laerzio. Note testuali, esegetiche e metodologiche, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar

  • Lathiere, A.–M. 1972. “Lucrèce Traducteur d’Épicure: Animus, Anima dans les Livres 3 et 4 du De rerum natura”, Phoenix 26, 123–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laursen, S. 1995. “The Early Parts of Epicurus, On Nature, 25th Book”, Cronache Ercolanesi 25, 5–109.Google Scholar

  • Leone, G. 2002. “Epicuro, Della natura: libro XXXIV. PHerc. 1431”, Cronache Ercolanesi 32, 7–135.Google Scholar

  • Leone, G. 2012. Epicuro, Sulla natura: libro II, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

  • Leone, G. 2015. “Nuovi spunti di riflessione sulla dottrina epicurea degli εἵδωλα dalla rilettura del II libro Sulla natura”, in Masi–Maso (2015) 35–53.Google Scholar

  • Masi, F. G. 2014. “Gli atomi ricordano? Fisicalismo e memoria nella psicologia di Epicuro”, Antiquorum Philosophia 8, 121–141.Google Scholar

  • Masi, F. G. 2015. “Dagli occhi alla mente: il cammino tortuoso degli εἵδωλα”, in Masi–Maso (2015) 107–134.Google Scholar

  • Masi, F. G. 2017. “Sognare oggetti nascosti. La teoria onirica epicurea”, in F. Alesse, A. Fermani, S. Maso, Studi su Ellenismo e Filosofia Romana, Roma, Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 65–94.Google Scholar

  • Masi, F. G., Maso, S. 2015. Epicurus on Eidola, Peri Physeos, Book II. Updates, Proposals, and Discussions, Amsterdam, Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar

  • Masi, F. G., Verde, F. 2018. “Mind in an Atomistic World”, in J. Sisko, Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity. The History of the Philosophy of Mind, vol. 1, New York, Routledge, 236–257.Google Scholar

  • Nemeth, A. 2017. Epicurus on the Self, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Repici, L. 2008. Il pensiero dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio, in F. Alesse, F. Aronadio, M. C. Dalfino, L. Simeoni, E. Spinelli (a cura di), Anthropine Sophia: Studi di filologia e storiografia filosofica in memoria di Gabriele Giannantoni, Napoli, Bibliopolis, 379–406.Google Scholar

  • Schrijvers, P. H. 1976. “La pensée d’Épicure et Lucrèce sur le sommeil (DRN, IV, 907–961, Scolie ad Épicure, Ep. ad Her. 66): un chapitre des Parva Naturalia épicuriens”, in J. Bollack, A. Laks (drs.), Études sur l’Épicurisme antique (Cahiers de Philologie, 1), Villeneuve d’Ascq, Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 229–259.Google Scholar

  • Smith, M. F. 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean Inscription, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

  • Tsouna, V. 2003. “Portare davanti agli occhi: Una tecnica retorica nelle opere ‘morali’ di Filodemo”, Cronache Ercolanesi 33, 243–247.Google Scholar

  • Tsouna, V. (forthcoming), “Epicurean Dreams”.Google Scholar

  • Verde, F. 2015. “Monismo psicologico e dottrina dell’anima in Epicuro e Lucrezio”, in E. Canone (a cura di), Anima–corpo alla luce dell’etica. Antichi e Moderni, Firenze, Olschki, 49–64.Google Scholar

  • Verde, F. 2016. “Percezione errore e residuo percettivo in Aristotele, Epicuro e Alessandro di Afrodisia”, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 1, 44–62.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-24

Published in Print: 2018-11-30


Citation Information: Elenchos, Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 257–279, ISSN (Online) 2037-7177, ISSN (Print) 0392-7342, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2018-0016.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in