Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
NEW AT DE GRUYTER

Elenchos

Journal of Studies on Ancient Thought

Ed. by Alesse, Francesca / Chiaradonna, Riccardo / Spinelli, Emidio

Editorial Board: Aronadio, Francesco / Berti, Enrico / Brancacci, Aldo / Centrone, Bruno / Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda / Dorandi, Tiziano / Ioppolo, Anna Maria / Opsomer, Jan / Rashed, Marwan / Reydams-Schils, Gretchen / Sedley, David


CiteScore 2018: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.111
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.522

Online
ISSN
2037-7177
See all formats and pricing
More options …

La trattazione vetero-stoica dell’ira: componenti logiche e caratteri fisiologici

Francesca Alesse
Published Online: 2018-11-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2018-0019

Abstract

The paper compares the two components of the Stoic definition of pathos, the logico-linguistic component and the physiological, ‘pneumatic’ one, in order to examine the role that each of them plays in the onset of pathos, its persistence in the human soul, its possible eradication. The analysis is focused on anger (ὀργή) which reveals some peculiarities, especially as regards its logical structure, due to the fact that this passion seems to be the combination of two different feelings. The anger indeed is classified as a species of desire but the description of its onset also includes pain.

Keywords: Stoicism; anger; desire; pain; therapy of soul

Bibliography

  • Allen, D. S. 2003. “Angry Bees, Wasps, and Jurors: the Symbolic Politics of ὀργή in Athens”, in Ancient Anger. Perspectives from Homer to Galen, ed. by S. Braund and G. W. Most, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 76‒98.Google Scholar

  • Boeri, M. D., Salles, R. 2014. (eds.) Los Filósofos Estoicos. Ontología, Logíca, Física y Ética. Traducción, comentario filosófico y edición anotada de los principales textos griegos y latinos, Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Brennan, T. 1998. “The Old Stoic Theory of Emotions”, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. by J. Sihvola and T. Engberg‒Pedersen, Dordrecht, Springer, 21‒70.Google Scholar

  • Cairns, D. L. 2003. “Ethics, Ethology, Terminology: iliadic Anger and the Cross-Cultural Study of Emotion”, in Ancient Anger. Perspectives from Homer to Galen, ed. by S. Braund and G. W. Most, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 11‒49.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, J. 1998. “Posidonius on Emotions”, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. by J. Sihvola and T. Engberg‒Pedersen, Dordrecht, Springer, 71‒111.Google Scholar

  • Donini, P. L. 1995. “Struttura delle passioni e del vizio e loro cura in Crisippo”, Elenchos 16, 305‒329.Google Scholar

  • Fillion‒Lahille, J. 1984. Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne, Paris, Klincksieck.Google Scholar

  • Frede, M. 1986. “The Stoic Doctrine of the Affections of the Soul”, in The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. by M. Schofield and G. Striker, Cambridge–Paris,Cambridge University Press – Ed. de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 93‒110.Google Scholar

  • Garofalo, I. 1988. Erasistrati fragmenta, Pisa, Giardini.Google Scholar

  • Gastaldi, S. 2014. Aristotele. Retorica. Introduzione, traduzione e commento, Roma, Carocci Editore.Google Scholar

  • Gill, C. 1998. “Did Galen Understand Platonic and Stoic Thinking on Emotions?”, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. by J. Sihvola, T. Engberg‒Pedersen, Dordrecht, Springer, 113‒148.Google Scholar

  • Gourinat, J.‒B. 2005. “Le traité de Chrysippe Sur lâme”, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4, 557‒577.Google Scholar

  • Graver, M. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion, Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Harris, W. 2004. Restraining Rage. The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge (Ma.)/London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hoyos Sanchez, I. 2016. “Opinion faible et horme pleonazousa”, Philosophie Antique 16, 181‒208.Google Scholar

  • Inwood, B. 1987. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ioppolo, A. M. 1995. “L’ὁρμὴ πλεονάζουσα nella dottrina stoica della passione”, Elenchos 16, 23‒55.Google Scholar

  • Isnardi Parente, M. 1989. (a cura di), Gli Stoici. Opere e testimonianze, Torino, UTET.Google Scholar

  • Kassel, R. 1976. Aristotelis ars rhetorica, Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Knuuttila, S. 2006. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Konstan, D. 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks. Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, Toronto/Buffalo/London, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Konstan, D. 2010. “Rhetoric and Emotion”, in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, ed. by I. Worthington, Oxford, Wiley‒Blackwell, 411‒426.Google Scholar

  • Long, A. A. 1999. “Stoic Psychology”, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. by K. Algra, J. Mansfeld and M. Schofield, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 560‒584.Google Scholar

  • Long, A. A., Sedley, D. N. 1987. (eds.) The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources, with Philosophical Commentary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (rist. 2003).Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, M. 1994. Therapy of Desire. Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, M. 2004. “Emotions as Judgments of Value and Importance”, in Thinking about Feeling. Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. by R. C. Solomon, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 183‒199.Google Scholar

  • Radice, R. 2002. Stoici antichi. Tutti i frammenti, Milano, Bompiani.Google Scholar

  • Ranocchia, G. 2012. “The Stoic Concept of Proneness to Emotion and Vice”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94, 74‒92.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Rapp, C. 2002. Aristoteles. Rhetorik. Übersetzung, Einleitung Kommentar, 2 Bände, in Aristoteles, Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, Bände 4.1–2, ed. by H. Flashar, Berlin, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Sherman, J. (di prossima pubblicazione). “Chrysippus and Posidonius on Excessive Impulse: A Study in Stoic Moral Psychology” (https://www.academia.edu/9491108/Chrysippus_and_Posidonius_on_Excessive_Impulse_A_Study_in_Stoic_Moral_Psychology [01.09.2018]).

  • Sorabji, R. 1998. “Chrysippus-Posidonius-Seneca: A High-Level Debate on Emotion”, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. by J. Sihvola and T. Engberg‒Petersen, Dordrecht, Springer, 149‒170.Google Scholar

  • Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul. Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis, Books II and III, Leiden/New York/Köln, Brill.Google Scholar

  • Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections. Reconstruction and Interpretation, Leiden/Boston, Brill.Google Scholar

  • van der Eijk, P. J. 2000. Diocles of Carystos: A Collection of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary, vol. 1: Text and Translation, Leiden/Boston/Köln, Brill.Google Scholar

  • Viano, C. 2014. “Le paradigme des passions: aristote et les définitions non physiques de la colère”, Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8, 1‒19.Google Scholar

  • Viano, C. 2016. “Materia e causa materiale delle passioni: Aristotele e la definizione fisica della collera”, in Materia e causa materiale in Aristotele e oltre, a cura di C. Viano, Roma, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 61‒76.Google Scholar

  • Vogt, K. M. 2006. “Anger, Present Injustice and Future Revenge in Seneca’s De Ira” in Seeing Seneca Whole. Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics, ed. by K. Volk and G. D. Williams, Leiden/Boston, Brill, 57‒74.Google Scholar

  • Zanatta, M. 2004. Aristotele. Retorica e Poetica, Torino, UTET.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-24

Published in Print: 2018-11-30


Citation Information: Elenchos, Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 323–347, ISSN (Online) 2037-7177, ISSN (Print) 0392-7342, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2018-0019.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in