Abstract
Aëtius Placita 1.3.8, in the chapter On Principles, provides a systematic overview of Pythagorean thought, which can be instructively compared with ps.-Archytas On Principles, provided both fragments of the latter are kept together.
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due as usual to David Runia for suggestions and the removal of infelicities.
References
Bonazzi, M. 2007. “Eudorus of Alexandria and Early Imperial Platonism”, in Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC – 200 AD, vol. 2, edited by R. W. Sharples and R. Sorabji, London, Institute of Classical Studies, 365–377.Search in Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2013a. “Pythagoreanizing Aristotle: Eudorus and the Systematization of Platonism”, in Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century. New Directions in Philosophy, edited by M. Schofield, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 160–186.Search in Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2013b. “Eudorus of Alexandria and the ‘Pythagorean’ pseudepigrapha”, in On Pythagoreanism, edited by G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, and C. Macris, Berlin–Boston, De Gruyter, 385–404.Search in Google Scholar
Brittain, Ch. 2005. “Common Sense: Concepts, Definition and Meaning in and out of the Stoa”, in Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Era, edited by D. Frede and B. Inwood, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 164–209.10.1017/CBO9780511482526.008Search in Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972a. “Zur geistesgeschichtlichen Einordnung einiger Pseudopythagorica”, in Pseudepigrapha: pseudopythagorica. Lettres de Platon. Littérature pseudépigraphique juive, edited by K. von Fritz, Vandoeuvres–Genève, Fondation Hardt, 215–254. repr. in W. Burkert, Kleine Schriften, III: Mystica, Orphica, Pythagorica, edited by F. Graf, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008, 278–298.Search in Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972b. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press. (rev. trans. of W. Burkert, Weisheit und Wissenschaft. Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon, Nurnberg, Carl, 1962).Search in Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. 1976. M. Terentius Varro Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum T. 1: Die Fragmente, T. 2: Kommentar, Wiesbaden, Steiner.Search in Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 1994. “Pseudo-Archytas”, in Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques, vol. 1, edited by R. Goulet, Paris, Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 342–345.Search in Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2000. “La letteratura pseudopitagorica: origine, diffusione e finalità”, in La letteratura pseudepigrafa nella cultura greca e romana, edited by C. Cerri, Napoli, Istituto Universitario Orientale, 429–452.Search in Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2014. “The Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings”, in A History of Pythagoreanism, edited by C. A. Huffman, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 315–340.10.1017/CBO9781139028172.016Search in Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2015. “Neopitagorismo e Medioplatonismo: un confronto difficile”, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 2, 399–423.10.3280/SF2015-002007Search in Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (forthcoming). “The pseudopythagorica and their Philosophical Background. A discussion of Angela Ulacco, Pseudopythagorica dorica”.Search in Google Scholar
De Cesaris, G. and Horky, Ph. 2018. “Hellenistic Pythagorean Epistemology”, in Lexicon Philosophicum, Special Issue: Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge, edited by F. Verde and M. Catapano, Rome, CNR–ILIESI, 221–262.Search in Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1879. Doxographi graeci, Berlin, Weidmann–De Gruyter (abbreviated DG).Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1977. The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, London, Duckworth. rev. repr. 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2003. The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy 347–274 BC, Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198237669.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2010. “Speusippus and the Ontological Interpretation of the Parmenides”, in History and Interpretation from the Old Academy to Later Platonism and Gnosticism, edited by J. D. Turner and K. Corrigan, Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature, 67–78.Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2014. “Pythagoreanism in the Academic Tradition: The Early Academy to Numenius”, in A History of Pythagoreanism, edited by C. A. Huffman, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 250–273.10.1017/CBO9781139028172.013Search in Google Scholar
Dombart, B. and Kalb, A. 1955. Sancti Aurelii Augustini De civitate Dei libri XXII, vol. 2, Turnhout, Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
Gaiser K. 1963. Platons ungeschriebene Lehre, Stuttgart, Ernst Klett Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Giannattasio Andria, R. 1989. I frammenti delle “Successioni dei filosofi”, Napoli, Arte Tipografica.Search in Google Scholar
Heinze, R. 1892. Xenokrates. Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente, Leipzig, Teubner. repr. Hildesheim, Olms, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2001. “The Philolaic Method: The Pythagoreanism behind the Philebus”, in Essays in Ancient Philosophy, VI: before Plato, edited by A. Preus, Albany N.Y, Suny Press, 67–85.Search in Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2005. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482533Search in Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2013. “Plato and the Pythagoreans”, in On Pythagoreanism, edited by G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, and C. Macris, Berlin–Boston, De Gruyter, 237–270.10.1515/9783110318500.237Search in Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2018. “Archytas”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2018 Edition, Edward N. Zalta ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/archytas/Search in Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1980. Speusippo. Frammenti, Edizione, traduzione e commento, Napoli, Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1982. Senocrate Ermodoro. Testimonianze e Frammenti, Edizione, traduzione e commento, Napoli, Bibliopolis. Cited from rev. ed. by T. Dorandi, Pisa, Edizioni della Normale, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Ch. H. 2001. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. A Brief History, Indianapolis–Cambridge, Hacket Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. 1990. [Plutarchus] De Homero, Leipzig, Teubner.10.1515/9783110952605Search in Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G. 1993. Plutarque Œuvres morales, T. 12.2: Opinions des philosophes, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2013. “The Pythagorean Hypomnemata Reported by Alexander Polyhistor in Diogenes Laertius 8.25–33: A Proposal for Reading”, in On Pythagoreanism, edited by G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, and C. Macris, Berlin–Boston, De Gruyter, 371–383.10.1515/9783110318500.371Search in Google Scholar
Lang, P. 1911. De Speusippo academici scriptis, accedunt fragmenta, diss. Bonn (repr. Hildesheim, Olms, 1964).Search in Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2013. “The Eclectic Pythagoreanism of Alexander Polyhistor”, in Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century. New Directions in Philosophy, edited by M. Schofield, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 139–159.10.1017/CBO9781139096713.009Search in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1992. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy, Leiden–Boston, E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004320765Search in Google Scholar
Mau, J. 1971. Plutarchi Moralia, Vol. 5.2.1: X oratorum vitae; Placita philosophorum, Leipzig, Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Mazzarelli, C. 1985. “Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria”, Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 77, 197–209, 535–555.Search in Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. 1991. Apuleius De philosophia libri, Stuttgart–Leipzig, Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Nolle, J. 1914. Ps.-Archytae Fragmenta, diss. Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. 2008. Heraclides of Pontus, Texts and translation, New Brunswick–London, Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2007–2009. Procli in Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria, vol. 3, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tarán, L. 1981. Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and a Commentary, Leiden–Boston, E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004320604Search in Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1961. An Introduction to the Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period, Åbo, Abo Akademi.Search in Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. 1965. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period Collected and Edited, Åbo, Abo Akademi.Search in Google Scholar
Ulacco, A. 2017. Pseudopythagorica Dorica: I trattati di argomento metafisico, logico ed epistemologico attributi ad Archita e Brotino, Berlin–Boston, De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501505485Search in Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. 1884. Ioannis Stobaei Anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae, Bd., Berlin, Weidmann–De Gruyter, 1–2.Search in Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 19692. Herakleides Pontikos, Basel–Stuttgart, Schwabe.Search in Google Scholar
Wendland, P. 1916. Hippolytus Werke, Bd. 3: refutatio omnium haeresium, Leipzig, Hinrichs. repr. Hildesheim/New York, Olms, 1977.10.1515/9783110299397Search in Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. 1990. Alcinoos. Enseignement des doctrines de Platon, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2013. “Pythagorean Number Theory in the Academy”, in On Pythagoreanism, edited by G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, and C. Macris, Berlin–Boston, De Gruyter, 323–344.10.1515/9783110318500.323Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston