Abstract
Many studies concerning morphing aircraft concepts in which enhanced performance and increased energy efficiency are two of the main goals have been recently conducted. Some of those concepts deal with wing span changes. In line with those, in a variable-span wing of the telescopic type, the cross-sections of the sliding panels, whether be two, three or more, must be made geometrically compatible among them. This requirement serves two purposes: to minimize the aerofoils’ geometric discontinuity which negatively affects wing drag and lift; and to provide a simple structural support between any two sliding panels. This paper describes the methodology employed to develop geometrically compatible aerofoils obtained from a constant geometric offset applied to a given initial aerofoil. This methodology is used to create inward offset aerofoils and outward offset aerofoils. The geometric and aerodynamic characteristics of the resulting offset aerofoils are compared with those of the original aerofoils. From the analysis of six different original aerofoils, strong trends in the geometric changes and in the aerodynamic characteristics of the resulting inward and outward offset aerofoils are observed. Ultimately, this study can help a telescopic wing designer decide whether an inward or an outward offset aerofoil is more appropriate for the specific design at hand.
References
[1] Barbarino S., Bilgen O., Ajaj R.M., Friswell M.I., Inman D. J., A review of Morphing Aircraft, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2011, 22 (9), 823-877 10.1177/1045389X11414084Search in Google Scholar
[2] Amador M.B., Kulkarni V., Morphing Wing Design for UAVs: A proposed Concept, BSc thesis, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2009 Search in Google Scholar
[3] Tidwell Z., Joshi S., Crossley W., Ramakrishnan S., Comparison of Morphing Wing Strategies Based Upon Aircraft Performance Impacts, Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (19- 22 April 2004, Palm Springs, California, USA), AIAA, 2004 10.2514/6.2004-1722Search in Google Scholar
[4] Flanagan J.S., Strutzenberg R.C.,Myers R.B., Rodrian J.E., Development and Flight Testing of a Morphing Aircraft, the NextGen MFX-1, Procedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (23- 26 April 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA), AIAA, 2007 10.2514/6.2007-1707Search in Google Scholar
[5] Neal D., Good M., Johnston C., Robertsha H., Mason W., Inman D., Design and Wind-Tunnel Analysis of a Fully Adaptative Aircraft Configuration, Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (19-22 April 2004, Palm Springs, California, USA), AIAA, 2004 10.2514/6.2004-1727Search in Google Scholar
[6] Secanell M., Suleman A., Gamboa P., Design of a Morphing Aerofoil Using Aerodynamic Shape Optimization, AIAA Journal, 2006, 44 (7), 1550-1562 10.2514/1.18109Search in Google Scholar
[7] Marques M., Gamboa P., Andrade E., Design of a Variable Camber Flap for MinimumDrag and Improved Energy Eflciency, Proceedings of 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (4-7 May 2009, Palm Springs, California, USA), AIAA, 2009 10.2514/6.2009-2196Search in Google Scholar
[8] Mestrinho J., Gamboa P., Santos P., Design Optimization of a Variable-Span Morphing Wing for a Small UAV, Proceedings of the 52th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (4-7 April 2011, Denver, Colorado, USA), AIAA, 2011 10.2514/6.2011-2025Search in Google Scholar
[9] Gamboa P., Vale J., Lau F., Suleman A., Optimization of a Morphing Wing Based on Coupled Aerodynamic and Structural Constraints, AIAA Journal, 2009, 47 (9), 2087-2104 10.2514/1.39016Search in Google Scholar
[10] Felício J., Santos P., Gamboa P., Silvestre M., Evaluation of a Variable-Span Morphing Wing for a Small UAV, Proceedings of the 52th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (4-7 April 2011, Denver, Colorado, USA), AIAA, 2011 10.2514/6.2011-2074Search in Google Scholar
[11] Santos P., Sousa J., Gamboa P., Variable-span wing development for improved flight performance, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2015, DOI: 10.1177/1045389X15595296 10.1177/1045389X15595296Search in Google Scholar
[12] Albuquerque P.F., Gamboa P.V., Silvestre M.A.,Multidisciplinary and Multilevel Aircraft Design Methodology using Enhanced Collaborative Optimization, Proceedings of 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference (22-26 June 2015, Dallas, Texas, USA), AIAA, , 2015 10.2514/6.2015-2650Search in Google Scholar
[13] Drela M., XFOIL 6.94 User Guide, Technical Report., Massachusetts Institute of Technology & Astro Harold Youngren Aerocraft, Inc., USA, 2001 Search in Google Scholar
[14] Selig M.S., Low Reynolds number airfoil design lecture notes, VKI Lect. Ser., 2003, 24-28 Search in Google Scholar
[15] Morgado J., Vizinho R., Silvestre M.A.R., Páscoa J.C., XFOIL vs CFD performance predictions for high lift low Reynolds number airfoils, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 52, 207-214 10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.031Search in Google Scholar
©2016 Diogo Sousa et al.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.