Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

e-Polymers

Editor-in-Chief: Agarwal, Seema / Greiner, Andreas

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.111

CiteScore 2017: 1.02

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.335
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.430

Online
ISSN
1618-7229
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 13 (2013)

Volume 12 (2012)

Volume 11 (2011)

Volume 10 (2010)

Volume 9 (2009)

Volume 8 (2008)

Volume 7 (2007)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 5 (2005)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 3 (2003)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Coating of Al mould surfaces with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) and ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE)

Akin Akinci
  • Corresponding author
  • Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Esentepe Campus, 54187, Sakarya/Turkey; fax: +9026426955601
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Ebutalip Cobanoglu
  • Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Esentepe Campus, 54187, Sakarya/Turkey; fax: +9026426955601
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-08-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly.2009.9.1.401

Abstract

Because of low cost, easily productivity and high thermal conductivity, aluminum (Al) moulds are preferred in the production of the polyurethane (PUR) parts. In this study, adhesion behavior and surface properties of coated materials between mould used in the production of automotive seat and PUR materials were investigated. Four different polymer types were coated on Al mould and they were characterized using contact angle, surface roughness, coating thickness, adhesion, cross-cut and SEM test methods. It was found that, PFA has the least value of surface roughness and ETFE has the highest one in the four different coatings produced. After holding period in isocyanate, decrease were measured on the angle values of all coatings. In the contact angle measurements before and after isocyanate tests, PFA exhibited the highest contact angle value.

About the article

Published Online: 2013-08-31

Published in Print: 2009-12-01


Citation Information: e-Polymers, Volume 9, Issue 1, 033, ISSN (Online) 1618-7229, ISSN (Print) 2197-4586, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly.2009.9.1.401.

Export Citation

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co..Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Francisco Sánchez-Urbano, Guillermo Paz-Gómez, Óscar Rodríguez-Alabanda, Pablo Romero, Miguel Cabrerizo-Vílchez, Miguel Rodríguez-Valverde, and Guillermo Guerrero-Vaca
Coatings, 2018, Volume 8, Number 9, Page 301
[2]
Vanessa Cardoso, Daniela Correia, Clarisse Ribeiro, Margarida Fernandes, and Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez
Polymers, 2018, Volume 10, Number 2, Page 161
[3]
Ruixia Yuan, Shiqi Wu, Peng Yu, Baohui Wang, Liwen Mu, Xiguang Zhang, Yixing Zhu, Bing Wang, Huaiyuan Wang, and Jiahua Zhu
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, Volume 8, Number 19, Page 12481

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in