Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Review of Contract Law

Managing Editor: Grundmann, Stefan

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 3, Issue 3


The CFR and the Method(s) of Comparative Legal Research

Marieke Oderkerk
Published Online: 2007-10-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ERCL.2007.022


In the context of comparative legal research projects aiming at the creation of the Common Frame of Reference it has been argued that it is a flaw in the functional method that it is unable to lead to the ‘best solutions’. This paper argues that the problem belongs to the phase of evaluation of a comparative legal research project and needs an answer from within that context. It further argues that it is correct to say that the functional method is not able to identify the ‘best solutions’, but that it is not its purpose to do so. Rather, its purpose is to identify those objects in the selected legal systems that can usefully be compared. This paper suggests that the functional method should be considered a useful tool in the comparative legal research projects aiming at the creation of the Common Frame of Reference and that what is needed is a set of unequivocal evaluation criteria by which best solutions can be individuated.

About the article

Published Online: 2007-10-24

Published in Print: 2007-10-26

Citation Information: European Review of Contract Law, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 315–331, ISSN (Online) 1614-9939, ISSN (Print) 1614-9920, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ERCL.2007.022.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Richard Cramer and Michel Vols
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2016, Volume 49, Page 114

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in