Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 18, 2013

Entrepreneurship Success: “The Lone Ranger” Versus “It Takes a Village” Approach?

  • Sharon M. Danes EMAIL logo

Abstract

A prominent metaphor in the entrepreneurship literature is challenged. The entrepreneur is often depicted as a “Lone Ranger” symbolized as a stoic individual making entrepreneurial decisions in isolation. Although entrepreneurship research has examined the impact of social context on venture creation, it has done so without specific regard to the spousal relationship. Based on this literature gap, another metaphor of “It Takes a Village” is suggested. Such a metaphor recognizes that many entrepreneurs make their entrepreneurial decisions within an immediate decision context of the couple potentially creating a greater probability of new venture success. That decision context is ripe with a myriad of emotions that must be traversed in moving toward mutually shared decisions. If entrepreneurs have a strong couple relationship as they create new ventures, that relationship strength can provide a reliable stock of resilience capacity that can be drawn upon to combat the liability of newness of a new venture.

References

Boden, R.J., and A.R. Nucci. 2000. “On the Survival Prospects of Men’s and Women’s New Business Ventures.” Journal of Business Venturing 15:347–62.10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00004-4Search in Google Scholar

Carter, N.M., W.B. Gartner, K.G. Shaver, and E.J. Gatewood. 2003. “The Career Reasons for Nascent Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Business Venturing 18:13–39.10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00078-2Search in Google Scholar

Chrisman, J.J., J.H. Chua, and L.P. Steier. 2002. “The Influence of National Culture and Family Involvement on Entrepreneurial Perceptions and Performance at the State Level.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 26(4):113–29.10.1177/104225870202600407Search in Google Scholar

Chrisman, J.J., J.H. Chua, and P. Sharma. 2005. “Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(5):555–75.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cramton, C.D. 1993. “Is Rugged Individualism the Whole Story? Public and Private Accounts of a Firm’s Founding.” Family Business Review 6:233–61.10.1111/j.1741-6248.1993.00233.xSearch in Google Scholar

Danes, S.M. 2011. “Pillow Talk Leaks: Integrating Couple Interactions into Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 1(3):1–5.10.2202/2157-5665.1040Search in Google Scholar

Danes, S.M., and K.E. Brewton. 2012. “Follow the Capital: Benefits of Tracking Family Capital across Family and Business Systems.” In Understanding Family Businesses: Undiscovered Approaches, Unique Perspectives, and Neglected Topics, edited by Alan Carsrud and Malin Brannback, Chapter 14, 227–50. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-0911-3_14Search in Google Scholar

Danes, S.M., J. Lee, K. Stafford, and R.K.Z. Heck. 2008. “The Effects of Ethnicity, Families and Culture on Entrepreneurial Experience: An Extension of Sustainable Family Business Theory.” Invited article for Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Special Issue titled Empirical Research on Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship in the U.S., 13(3):229–68.Search in Google Scholar

Danes, S.M., A.E. Matzek, and J.D. Werbel. 2010. “Spousal Context During the Venture Creation Process.” In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, edited by A. Stewart, G.T. Lumpkin, and J.A. Katz, Vol. 12, Chapter 4, 113–62. Entrepreneurship and Family Business (J.A. Katz and G.T. Lumpkin (Series Eds.)). New Milford, CT: Emerald.10.1108/S1074-7540(2010)0000012007Search in Google Scholar

Danes, S.M., K. Stafford, G. Haynes, and S. Amarapurkar. 2009. “Family Capital of Family Firms: Bridging Human, Social, and Financial Capital.” Family Business Review 22(3):199–215.10.1177/0894486509333424Search in Google Scholar

Danes, S.M., K. Stafford, J.T. Loy. 2007. “Family Business Performance: The Effects of Gender and Management.” Journal of Business Research 60(10):1058–69.10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.013Search in Google Scholar

De Carolis, D.M., and P. Saparito. 2006. “Social Capital, Cognition, and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: A Theoretical Framework.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30:41–56.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dimov, D. 2007. “Beyond the Single-Person, Single-Insight Attribution in Understanding Entrepreneurial Opportunities.” Entrepreneurship, Theory, and Practice 31(5):713–31.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00196.xSearch in Google Scholar

Fletcher, D. 2010. “‘Life-Making or Risk Taking’? Co-Preneurship and Family Business Start-Ups.” International Small Business Journal 28(5):452–69.10.1177/0266242610370391Search in Google Scholar

Gartner, W.B. 1989, Summer. ““Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question.” Entrepreneurship, Theory, and Practice 14:47–68.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, V.H., and A.S. York. 2008. Geographical and Generational Context Effects of Women’s Attitudes Towards Entrepreneurship. USASBE 2008 Proceedings:1437–55.Search in Google Scholar

Hobfoll, S.E. 1989. “Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress.” American Psychologist 44:513–24.10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513Search in Google Scholar

Hobfoll, S.E., and C.D. Spielberger. 1992. “Family Stress: Integrating Theory and Measurement.” Journal of Family Psychology 6:99–112.10.1037/0893-3200.6.2.99Search in Google Scholar

Matzek, A.E., C.G. Gudmunson, and S.M. Danes. 2010. “Spousal Capital as a Resource for Couples Starting a Business.” Family Relations 59:58–71.10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00586.xSearch in Google Scholar

Penley, L.E., and S. Gould. 1998. “Etzioni’s Model of Organizational Involvement: A Perspective for Understanding Commitment to Organizations.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 9:43–59.10.1002/job.4030090105Search in Google Scholar

Procidano, M.E., and K. Heller. 1983. “Measures of Perceived Social Support from Friends and from Family: Three Validation Studies.” American Journal of Community Psychology 11:1–24.10.1007/BF00898416Search in Google Scholar

Renzulli, L.A., H. Aldrich, and J. Moody. 2003. “Family Matters: Gender, Networks, and Entrepreneurial Outcomes.” Social Forces 79(2):523–46.10.2307/2675508Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, B.R., and M.T. Bentley. 1992. “The Impact of the Family on Home-Based Work.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 13:279–97.10.1007/BF01020452Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, C.C., and S.M. Danes. 2001. “The Relationship between Inclusion and Control in Resort family Businesses: A Developmental Approach to Conflict.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 22:293–320.10.1023/A:1016604023763Search in Google Scholar

Van Auken, H., and J. Werbe. 2006. “Family Dynamic and Family Business Financial Performance: Spousal Commitment.” Family Business Review 19:49–63.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00059.xSearch in Google Scholar

Westman, M., and D. Etzion. 1995. “Crossover of Stress, Strain and Resources from One Spouse to Another.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 16:169–81.10.1002/job.4030160207Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-07-18

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 19.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2013-0056/html
Scroll to top button