Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Entrepreneurship Research Journal

Ed. by Labaki, Rania / Lyons, Thomas / Zachary, Ramona K. / Mishra, Chandra

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.630
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.821

CiteScore 2017: 1.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.412
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.189

Online
ISSN
2157-5665
See all formats and pricing
Online
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 383.00 / US$ 516.00 / GBP 314.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 99.00 / US$ 149.00 / GBP 80.00*
*Prices in US$ apply to orders placed in the Americas only. Prices in GBP apply to orders placed in Great Britain only. Prices in € represent the retail prices valid in Germany (unless otherwise indicated). Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. RRP: Recommended Retail Price.
More options …

Resource Dependence and the Exits of Young Firms

Jason Harkins / Nancy Forster-Holt
Published Online: 2014-07-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0063

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Abstract

Which entrepreneurial firms exit by merger or sale, and which exit by closing? We draw on resource dependence theory in order to explore how new venture dependencies on the founder and industry affect the type of firm exit. While previous researchers have concluded that early stage firms rely on the human capital of the entrepreneur to survive and thrive, we suggest that certain dependencies can act as barriers to exit through a merger or a sale. Likewise, we suggest that industries that are low tech and industries that experience high firm turnover create dependencies on the local market, and exit is less likely by a sale or a merger. We test our model using binary logistic regression on a 2012 sample from the Kauffman Firm Survey of 451 firms founded in 2004. We find that firms that are operated as sole proprietorships and firms that are operated out of the primary owner’s home are significantly, negatively related to exit by a merger or a sale. Firms operating in high-tech industries are significantly, positively related to exit by a merger or a sale. These findings hold even when controlling for the size, performance, and competitive advantage of the exiting firms. Our findings offer preliminary evidence that resource dependencies affect exit outcomes.

Keywords: entrepreneurial exit; resource dependence theory; individual; firm; business transfer; churn

References

  • Acs, Z. J., and D. B. Audretsch. 1989. “Small-Firm Entry in US Manufacturing.” Economica 56(222):255–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aldrich, H. E., and J. Pfeffer. 1976. “Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 2:79–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alvarez, S. A., and J. B. Barney. 2004. “Organizing Rent Generation and Appropriation: Toward a Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm.” Journal of Business Venturing 19(5):621–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alvarez, S. A., and L. W. Busenitz. 2001. “The Entrepreneurship of Resource-Based Theory.” Journal of Management 27(6):755–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bates, T. 1995. “Self-Employment Entry across Industry Groups.” Journal of Business Venturing 10(2):143–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Begley, T. M., and D. P. Boyd. 1986. “Executive and Corporate Correlates of Financial Performance in Smaller Firms.” Journal of Small Business Management 24(2):8–15.Google Scholar

  • Birley, S., and P. Westhead. 1994. “A Taxonomy of Business Start-Up Reasons and Their Impact on Firm Growth and Size.” Journal of Business Venturing 9(1):7–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J., and P. Sandner. 2009. “Necessity and Opportunity Entrepreneurs and Their Duration in Self-Employment: Evidence from German Micro Data.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 9(2):117–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boeker, W. 1989. “Strategic Change: The Effects of Founding and History.” Academy of Management Journal 32(3):489–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bower, J. L. 2001. “Not All M&As Are Alike – and That Matters.”Google Scholar

  • Brunninge, O., M. Nordqvist, and J. Wiklund. 2007. “Corporate Governance and Strategic Change in SMEs: The Effects of Ownership, Board Composition and Top Management Teams.” Small Business Economics 29(3):295–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brush, C. G., P. G. Greene, M. M. Hart, and L. F. Edelman. 1997. “Resource Configurations over the Life Cycle of Ventures.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1997 Edition:32–58.Google Scholar

  • Carree, M., and R. Thurik. 1996. “Entry and Exit in Retailing: Incentives, Barriers, Displacement and Replacement.” Review of Industrial Organization 11(2):155–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chapple, K., A. Markusen, G. Schrock, D. Yamamoto, and P. Yu. 2004. “Gauging Metropolitan ‘High-Tech’ and ‘I-Tech’ Activity.” Economic Development Quarterly 18(1):10–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, C. M., R. Alton, C. Rising, and A. Waldeck. 2011. “The Big Idea: The New M&A Playbook.” Harvard Business Review 89:48–57.Google Scholar

  • Colombo, M. G., and L. Grilli. 2005. “Founders’ Human Capital and the Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: A Competence-Based View.” Research Policy 34(6):795–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Covin, J. G., D. P. Slevin, and T. J. Covin. 1990. “Content and Performance of Growth-Seeking Strategies: A Comparison of Small Firms in High-and Low Technology Industries.” Journal of Business Venturing 5(6):391–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidsson, P., and B. Honig. 2003. “The Role of Social and Human Capital among Nascent Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Business Venturing 18(3):301–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, G. F., and J. Adam Cobb. 2010. “Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 28:21–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeTienne, D. R. 2010. “Entrepreneurial Exit as a Critical Component of the Entrepreneurial Process: Theoretical Development.” Journal of Business Venturing 25(2):203–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeTienne, D. R., and M. Cardon. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Exit Strategies: The Impact of Human Capital.” In Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference (BCERC).Google Scholar

  • DeTienne, D., and M. Cardon. 2008. “The Impact of New Venture Design on Entrepreneurial Exit.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 28(1):Article 2.Google Scholar

  • DeTienne, D. R., and M. S. Cardon. 2012. “Impact of Founder Experience on Exit Intentions.” Small Business Economics 38(4):351–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emerson, R. M. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27(1):31–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Engel, P. H. 1999. What’s Your Exit Strategy?: 7 Ways to Maximize the Value of the Business You’ve Built. Rocklin, CA: Prima Pub.Google Scholar

  • Feeser, H. R., and G. E. Willard. 1990. “Founding Strategy and Performance: A Comparison of High and Low Growth High Tech Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 11:87–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Field, L. C., and J. M. Karpoff. 2002. “Takeover Defenses of IPO Firms.” The Journal of Finance 57(5):1857–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forster-Holt, N. 2013. “Entrepreneur as ‘End’repreneur: The Intention to Retire.” Small Business Institute Journal 9(2):29–42.Google Scholar

  • Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., and Hannan, M. T. 1983. “The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates.” American Sociological Review 48(5):692–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Georgellis, Y., P. Joyce, and A. Woods. 2000. “Entrepreneurial Action, Innovation and Business Performance: The Small Independent Business.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 7(1):7–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gimeno, J., T. B. Folta, A. C. Cooper, and C. Y. Woo. 1997. “Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42:750–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glancey, K. 1998. “Determinants of Growth and Profitability in Small Entrepreneurial Firms.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 4(1):18–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodstein, J., and W. Boeker. 1991. “Turbulence at the Top: A New Perspective on Governance Structure Changes and Strategic Change.” Academy of Management Journal 34(2):306–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hagedoorn, J. 2002. “Inter-Firm R&D Partnerships: An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns Since 1960.” Research Policy 31(4):477–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., et al. 1998. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River 577–664.Google Scholar

  • Harper, C. P., and L. C. Rose. 1993. “Accuracy of Appraisers and Appraisal Methods of Closely Held Companies.” Journal of Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 17:21–33.Google Scholar

  • Headd, B. 2003. “Redefining Business Success: Distinguishing Between Closure and Failure.” Small Business Economics 21(1):51–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hillman, A. J., M. C. Withers, and B. J. Collins. 2009. “Resource Dependence Theory: A Review.” Journal of Management 35(6):1404–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hmieleski, K. M., and R. A. Baron. 2009. “Entrepreneurs’ Optimism and New Venture Performance: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” Academy of Management Journal 52(3):473–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jennings, P., and G. Beaver. 1997. “The Performance and Competitive Advantage of Small Firms: A Management Perspective.” International Small Business Journal 15(2):63–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Justo, R., and D. R. DeTienne. 2008. “Family Situation and the Exit Event: An Extension of Threshold Theory.” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 28(14):2.Google Scholar

  • Katila, R., J. D. Rosenberger, and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2008. “Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53(2):295–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kauffman.org. Accessed 12/12/2013. http://www1.kauffman.org/kfs/About-the-KFS.aspx.

  • Lazear, E. P. 2004. “Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship.” American Economic Review 94:208–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leroy, H., S. Manigart, and M. Meuleman. 2010. “The Planned Decision to Transfer an Entrepreneurial Company.” IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development 7(1):7–22.Google Scholar

  • McGhan, A., and M. Porter. 1997. “How Much Does Industry Matter.” Strategic Management Journal 18:15–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKaskill, T. 2010. Ultimate Exits. Windsor, Melbourne: Breakthrough Publications.Google Scholar

  • Moore, C. F. 1986. “Understanding Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Definition and Model.” In Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 1, 66–70. Academy of Management.Google Scholar

  • Osborne, R. L. 1991. “The Dark Side of the Entrepreneur.” Long Range Planning 24(3):26–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ozcan, P., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 2009. “Origin of Alliance Portfolios: Entrepreneurs, Network Strategies, and Firm Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 52(2):246–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pennings, J. M., K. Lee, and A. Van Witteloostuijn. 1998. “Human Capital, Social Capital, and Firm Dissolution.” Academy of Management Journal 41(4):425–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

  • Porter, M. E. 1976. “Please Note Location of Nearest Exit: Exit Barriers and Planning.” California Management Review 19(2):21–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ragozzino, R., and J. J. Reuer. 2009. “Contingent Earnouts in Acquisitions of Privately Held Targets.” Journal of Management 35(4):857–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siegfried, J. J., and L. B. Evans. 1994. “Empirical Studies of Entry and Exit: A Survey of the Evidence.” Review of Industrial Organization 9(2):121–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. “Social Structure and Organizations.” In Handbook of Organizations, edited by J. G. March, 142–93. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

  • Thomsen, S., and T. Pedersen. 2000. “Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies.” Strategic Management Journal 21(6):689–705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tushman, M. L., and Romanelli, E. 1985. “Organizational Evolution: Interactions Between External and Emergent Processes and Strategic Choice.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8:171–222.Google Scholar

  • Ucbasaran, D., P. Westhead, M. Wright, and M. Flores. 2010. “The Nature of Entrepreneurial Experience, Business Failure and Comparative Optimism.” Journal of Business Venturing 25(6):541–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ulrich, D., and J. B. Barney. 1984. “Perspectives in Organizations: Resource Dependence, Efficiency, and Population.” Academy of Management Review 9(3):471–81.Google Scholar

  • United States Census Bureau Longitudinal Business Database. Accessed 4/02/2014.http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data.html.

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42:35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Teeffelen, L., and L. M. Uhlaner. 2013. “Firm Resource Characteristics and Human Capital as Predictors of Exit Choice: An Exploratory Study of SMEs.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 3(1):84–108.Google Scholar

  • Vardhan, J., and Biju, S. 2012. “A Binary Logistic Regression Model for Entrepreneurial Motivation Among University Students–A UAE Perspective.” Journal of Educational and Social Research 2(3):75–86.Google Scholar

  • Villanueva, J., A. H. Van de Ven, and H. J. Sapienza. 2012. “Resource Mobilization in Entrepreneurial Firms.” Journal of Business Venturing 27(1):19–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warrillow, J. 2010. Built to Sell. U.S.A: Penguin Group.Google Scholar

  • Wennberg, K., J. Wiklund, D. R. DeTienne, and M. S. Cardon. 2010. “Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Exit: Divergent Exit Routes and Their Drivers.” Journal of Business Venturing 25(4):361–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whisler, T. L. 1988. “The Role of the Board in the Threshold Firm.” Family Business Review 1(3):309–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang, T., and H. E. Aldrich. 2012. “Out of Sight But Not Out of Mind: Why Failure to Account for Left Truncation Biases Research on Failure Rates.” Journal of Business Venturing 27(4):477–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, Li., R. W. Jolly, and P. F. Orazem. 2009. “Firm Entry, Firm Exit, and Urban-Biased Growth.” Working paper, Iowa State University No. 13108.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-07-02

Published in Print: 2014-10-01

Citation Information: Entrepreneurship Research Journal, Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 323–349, ISSN (Online) 2157-5665, ISSN (Print) 2194-6175, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0063.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Hamieda Parker and Khadija Ameen
Journal of Business Research, 2017
[2]
Joseph Farhat, Sharon Matusik, Alicia Robb, and David T. Robinson
Small Business Economics, 2017
[3]
Nancy Forster-Holt
The Journal of Retirement, 2016, Volume 3, Number 4, Page 87
[4]
Nancy Forster-Holt
The Journal of Retirement, 2016
[5]
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Engineering, 2016, Volume 08, Number 03, Page 140

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in