Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Entrepreneurship Research Journal

Ed. by Alter, Theodore / Hughes, Mathew / Labaki, Rania / Lyons, Thomas / Mishra, Chandra / Mustafa, Michael / Zachary, Ramona K.


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.625
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.319

CiteScore 2018: 2.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.529
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.890

Online
ISSN
2157-5665
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: Is Product Quality a Missing Link?

Yang Yang
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin 150001, China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Xiao Feng Ju
  • School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, 92 West Dazhi Street, Nan Gang District, Harbin 150001, China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-09-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0091

Abstract

Prior literatures have argued that the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance may be not as straightforward as expected. With EO–performance contingency framework, this study investigates how product quality mediates the relationship between EO and firm performance. Using survey data from 153 new ventures, we find that EO dimensions have non-uniform and non-linear, rather than merely linear, relationships with product quality. Specifically, the results reveal that innovativeness and autonomy may lead to superior product quality, however, risk-taking would decrease, not increase, product quality. Proactiveness has U-shaped, not inverse U-shaped, effect on product quality and competitive aggressiveness has U-shaped, not positive linear, effect on product quality. Our results enrich the EO-performance contingency framework and highlight the significance of concerning independent and unique effects of individual EO dimension.

Keywords: entrepreneurial orientation; firm performance; product quality; new ventures

Highlights

  1. Product quality partially mediates the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance.

  2. Innovativeness increases product quality.

  3. Autonomy increases product quality.

  4. Risk-taking reduces, not increases, product quality.

  5. Proactiveness has U-shaped, not inverse U-shaped, effects on product quality.

  6. Competitive aggressiveness has U-shaped, not positive linear, effects on product quality.

References

  • Ahuja, G., and C.M. Lampert. 2001. “Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (6): 521–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arrow, K. J 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.”. In Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. 609–626. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Avlonitis, G. J., and H. E. Salavou. 2007. “Entrepreneurial Orientation of SMEs, Product Innovativeness, and Performance.” Journal of Business Research 60 (5): 566–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barney, J. B 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar

  • Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benner, M., and M. Tushman. 2003. “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited.” Academy of Management Review 28 (2): 238–256.Google Scholar

  • Brown, S. L., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 1995. “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions.” Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 343–378.Google Scholar

  • Copper, R. G., and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 1987. “New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers?” Journal of Product Innovation Management 4 (4): 169–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Covin, J. G., and D. Slevin. 1989. “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments.” Strategic Management Journal 10 (1): 75–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Covin, J. G., and W. J. Wales. 2012. “The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (4): 677–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dai, L., V. Maksimov, B. A. Gilbert, and S. A. Fernhaber. 2014. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and International Scope: The Differential Roles of Innovativeness, Proactiveness, and Risk-Taking.” Journal of Business Venturing 29: 511–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Danneels, E 2008. “Organizational Antecedents of Second-Order Competences.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (5): 519–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gatignon, H., and J. M. Xuereb. 1997. “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance.” Journal of Marketing Research 34: 77–90. (February).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, C., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (2): 209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • He, Z., and P. Wong. 2004. “Exploration Vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.” Organization Science 15 (4): 481–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henard, D. H., and D. M. Szymanski. 2001. “Why Some New Products Are More Successful Than Others.” Journal of Marketing Research 38 (3): 362–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hess, A. M., and F. T. Rothaermel. 2011. “When are Assets Complementary? Star Scientists, Strategic Alliances, and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 32: 895–909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes, M., and R. E. Morgan. 2007. “Deconstructing the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance at the Embryonic Stage of Firm Growth.” Industrial Marketing Management 36 (5): 651–661.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hult, G., C. C. Snow, and D. Kandemir. 2003. “The Role of Entrepreneurship in Building Cultural Competitiveness in Different Organizational Types.” Journal of Management 29 (3): 401–426.Google Scholar

  • Hyytinen, A., M. Pajarinenb, and P. Rouvinen. 2015. “Does Innovativeness Reduce Startup Survival Rates?” Journal of Business Venturing 30: 564–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Javalgi, R. R. G., and P. R. Todd. 2011. “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Management Commitment, and Human Capital: The Internationalization of SMEs in India.” Journal of Business Research 64 (9): 1004–1010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jaworski, B. J., and A. K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.” Journal of Marketing 57 (3): 53–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katila, R., and G. Ahuja. 2002. “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introductions.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 1183–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katila, R., and E. L. Chen. 2008. “Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (4): 593–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kessler, E. H., and A. K. Chakrabarti. 1996. “Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes.” Academy of Management Review 21 (4): 1143–1191.Google Scholar

  • Knight, G. A., G. M. Hult, and R. F. Hurley. 2004. “Innovativeness: Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance.” Industrial Marketing Management 33 (5): 429–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kollmann, T., and C. Stöckmann. 2014. “Filling the Entrepreneurial orientation–Performance Gap: The Mediating Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovations.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice September: 1001–1026.Google Scholar

  • , , , , Kreiser, Patrick M. , Louis D. Marino, Donald F. Kuratko, and K. Mark Weaver. 2012. “Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance.” Small Business Economics 40 (2): 273–291. DOI: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kwaku Atuahene-Gima, and Anthony Ko. 2001 (2). “An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation.” Organization Science 12 (1): 54–74. DOI: .CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavie, D., J. Kang, and L. Rosenkopf. 2011. “Balance within and across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances.” Organization Science 22 (6): 1517–1538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavie, D., and L. Rosenkopf. 2006. “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 797–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavie, D., U. Stettner, and M. Tushman. 2010. “Exploration and Exploitation within and across Organizations.” Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 109–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, H., and B. Choi. 2003. “Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination.” Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1): 179–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li, Y. H., J. W. Huang, and M. T. Tsai. 2009. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Knowledge Creation Process.” Industrial Marketing Management 38 (4): 440–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lisboa, A., D. Skarmeas, and C. Lages. 2011. “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Exploitative and Explorative Capabilities, and Performance Outcomes in Export Markets: A Resource-Based Approach.” Industrial Marketing Management 40 (8): 1274–1284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. Dess. 1996. “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance.” Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 135–172.Google Scholar

  • Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. Dess. 2001. “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle.” Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5): 429–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacMillan, I. C., and D. L. Day. 1987. “Corporate Ventures into Industrial Markets: Dynamics of Aggressive Entry.” Journal of Business Venturing 2 (1): 29–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • March, J. G 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2: 71–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDougall, P. P., J. G. Covin, R. B. Robinson, and L. Herron. 1994. “The Effects of Industry Growth and Strategic Breadth on New Venture Performance and Strategy Content.” Strategic Management Journal 15: 537–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNally, R. C., M. B. Akdeniz, and R. J. Calantone. 2011. “New Product Development Processes and New Product Profitability: Exploring the Mediating Role of Speed to Market and Product Quality.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28: 63–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D 1983. “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms.” Management Science 29 (7): 770–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mukherjee, A., and W. D. Hoyer. 2001. “The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research 28: 462–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Cass, A., N. Heiratib, and L. V. Ngoc. 2014. “Achieving New Product Success via the Synchronization of Exploration and Exploitation across Multiple Levels and Functional Areas.” Industrial Marketing Management 43 (5): 862–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parida, V., T. Lahti, and J. Wincent. 2016. “Exploration and Exploitation and Firm Performance Variability: A Study of Ambidexterity in Entrepreneurial Firms.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 12: 1147–1164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perez-Luno, A., J. Wiklund, and R. V. Cabrera. 2011. “The Dual Nature of Innovative Activity: How Entrepreneurial Orientation Influences Innovation Generation and Adoption.” Journal of Business Venturing 26 (5): 555–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K.J. 2004. “SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36: 717–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K.J., and A.F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.” Behavior Research Methods 40: 879–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rauch, A., J. Wiklund, G. Lumpkin, and M. Frese. 2009. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (3): 761–787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shan, P., M. Song, and X. Ju. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance: Is Innovation Speed a Missing Link?” Journal of Business Research 69 (2): 683–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Song, M., and Y. Chen. 2014. “Organizational Attributes, Market Growth, and Product Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (6): 1312–1329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Song, M., and M. E. Parry. 1997. “The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (1): 64–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Song, M., H. Van Der Bij, and M. Weggeman. 2006. “Factors for Improving the Level of Knowledge Generation in New Product Development.” R&D Management 36 (2): 173–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Staniewski, M. W., R. Nowacki, and K. Awruk. 2016. “Entrepreneurship and Innovativeness of Small and Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 12: 861–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stettner, U., and D. Lavie. 2014. “Ambidexterity under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions.” Strategic Management Journal 35: 1903–1929.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swink, M 2003. “Completing Projects On-Time: How Project Acceleration Affects New Product Development.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20 (4): 319–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szymanski, D. M., M. W. Kroff, and L. C. Troy. 2007. “Innovativeness and New Product Success: Insights from the Cumulative Evidence.” Journal of the Academy Marketing Science 35: 35–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tang, J., Z. Tang, L. D. Marino, Y. Zhang, and Q. Li. 2008. “Exploring an Inverted U-Shaped Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance in Chinese Ventures.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32 (1): 219–239.Google Scholar

  • Tatikonda, M. V., and M. M. Montoya-Weiss. 2001. “Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance.” Management Science 47: 151–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsai, K., and S. Yang. 2013. “Firm Innovativeness and Business Performance: The Joint Moderating Effects of Market Turbulence and Competition.” Industrial Marketing Management 42: 1279–1294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tushman, M., and C. O Reilly. 1996. “Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change.” California Management Review 38 (4): 8–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Uotila, J., M. Maula, T. Keil, and S. Zahra. 2009. “Exploration, Exploitation, and Financial Performance: Analysis of S&P 500 Corporations.” Strategic Management Journal 30 (2): 221–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wales, W. J., P. C. Patel, V. Parida, and P. M. Kreiser. 2013. “Nonlinear Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Resource Orchestration Capabilities.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7: 93–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, C. L 2008. “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32 (4): 635–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westerman, G., F. W. McFarlan, and M. Iansiti. 2006. “Organization Design and Effectiveness over the Innovation Life Cycle.” Organization Science 17 (2): 230–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiklund, J., and D. A. Shepherd. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach.” Journal of Business Venturing 20 (1): 71–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zortea-Johnston, E., J. Darroch, and S. Matear. 2012. “Business Orientations and Innovation in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 8: 145–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-05


Citation Information: Entrepreneurship Research Journal, Volume 8, Issue 1, 20170091, ISSN (Online) 2157-5665, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0091.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Thanh Hung NGUYEN and Van Binh TU
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2020, Volume 7, Number 2, Page 309

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in