Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.69

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.248

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1803-8417
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 5, Issue 1 (Jan 2013)

Issues

Landscape Metrics as a Tool for Evaluation Landscape Structure – Case Study Hustopeče

RNDr. Lenka Tlapáková Ph.D.
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, B. Němcové 2625, 530 02 Pardubice
  • Email:
/ Ing. Dagmar Stejskalová
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno
  • Email:
/ Mgr. Petr Karásek
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno
  • Email:
/ Ing. Jana Podhrázská Ph.D.
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno
  • Email:
Published Online: 2013-02-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0004

Abstract

The contribution presents the method of evaluation of rural landscape development in Hustopeče microregion by means of the analysis of landscape structure. Based on the computation of the values of landscape ecological indexes, development and typical and specific features in selected time horizons are interpreted. The time of the stable cadastre mapping (1825) was chosen as the initial period, other periods were the actual situation at present (2006) and the time between these two periods (the sixties of the 20th century). It is an agricultural landscape in southern Moravia used for intensive farming. Analysis results illustrate long-term continuing landscape utilization for agricultural production. All evaluative indexes indicate reduction of number of patches and edge effect, enlarging of patch area and, consequently, increasing of geometrical extent and coarse-grained landscape pattern.

Keywords: landscape structure; metric analyses; Land Use; Land Cover; GIS; stable cadastre; aerial photographs

  • [1] Boližiar, V., Brůna, V. & Křováková, K. (2008): Potential of antique maps and aerial photographs for landscape changes assessment - an example of the High Tatra Mts. Ekológia/Ecology, 27(1), 65-81.

  • [2] Cushman, S. A., McGariyal, K. & Neel, C. (2007). Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency. Ecological Indicators 8(5), 691-703. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=MarkedList&qid=12&SID=Z1HlkEdK8GDoCdkkkEe&page=1&doc=31&colName=WOS Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.08.001. [Crossref]

  • [3] Hayriye, E., Bulent, D., Baris, K., et al. (2010). Analyzing landscape changes in the Bafa Lake Nature Park of Turkey using remote sensing and landscape structure metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 165(1-4), 617-632. Doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0973-y. [Crossref]

  • [4] Fladmark, J., Mulvagh, G. & Evans, M. (1991). Tomorrow's Architectural heritage:Landscape and Buildings in the Countryside. Edinburgh and London:Mainstream Publishing.

  • [5] Forman, R.T., Godron, M (1993).Krajinná ekologie. Praha: Academia

  • [6] Girel, J., Barguet-Duport, B. Pautou, G. (1997). Landscape Structure and Historical Processes Along Diked European Valleys: A Case Study of the Arc/Isere Confluence (Savoie, France). Environmental Management. 21(6), 891-907. Doi: 10.1007/s002679900075. [Crossref]

  • [7] Guth, J. & Kučera, T. (1997). Monitorování změn krajinného pokryvu s využitím DPZ a GIS. Příroda Nr. 10, 107-124.

  • [8] Hais, M., Brom, J. & Pecharová, E. (2006). Evaluation of Landscape Changes by Remote Sensing. Životní Prostředí, 40(2), 80-83.

  • [9] Huang, C., Geiger, E. & Kupfer, J. (2006). Sensitivity of landscape metrics to classification scheme. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 27(14), 2927-2948. Doi: 10.1080/01431160600554330. [Crossref]

  • [10] Jian-hua, X., Yan, L., Nan-shan, A. & Wen-ze, Y. (2001). A study on landscape mosaic structure in urban-rural area in Northwest of China with RS and GIS. Chinese GeographicalScience 11(4), 366-376. Doi: 10.1007/s11769-001-0053-x. [Crossref]

  • [11] Juhás, I. (1991). Metódy diaĺkového prieskumu Zeme pri tvorbe krajinno-ekologických podkladov. Záhrada - Park - Krajina 1(2), 17-19.

  • [12] Kamusoko, C. & Aniya, M. (2007). Land use/cover change and landscape fragmentation analysis in the Bindura District, Zimbabwe. Land Degradation & Development. 18(2), 221-233. Doi: 10.1002/ldr.761. [Crossref]

  • [13] Kubeš, J. & Mičková, K. (2003). Development of horizontal landscape structure in the Pohořsko region (the Czech-Austrian frontier) between 1938 - 2000. Ekologia/Ecology 22(3), 269-283.

  • [14] Lipský, Z. (2000). Sledování změn v kulturní krajině. Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences.

  • [15] Lipský, Z., Romportl, D. (2006). Krajinné indikátory pro hodnocení změn krajinného rázu (pp. 51-56). In Voreil, I. & Sklenička, P., eds., Ochrana krajinného rázu - třináct letzkušeností, úspěchů i omylů. Praha: Czech University of Technology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic.

  • [16] Delin, L., Bicheng, L., Xianzhao, L. & Warrington, D. H. (2011). Monitoring land use change at a small watershed scale on the Loess Plateau, China: applications of landscape metrics, remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Earth Sciences 64(8), 2229-2239. Doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1051-7. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [17] Oguz, H. & Zengin, M. (2011). Analyzing land use/land cover change using remote sensing data and landscape structure metrics: a case study of Erzurum, Turkey. FreseniusEnvironmental Bulletin. 20(12a), 3258-3269.

  • [18] Pérez-Soba, M. & Wascher, D. M., eds. (2005). Landscape Character Areas. Places forbuilding a sustainable Europe. [Policy Brochure as deliverable from the EU´s Accompanying Measure project European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), funded under the 5th Framework Programme on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development]. Wageningen.

  • [19] Špulerová, J. (2008). Land use changes in the Veselovianka river catchment in the Horná Orava region. Ekológia/Ecology 27(3), 326-337.

  • [20] Walz, U. (2008). Monitoring of landscape change and functions in Saxony (Eastern Germany) - Methods and indicators. Symposium on Ecological Indicators at Multiple Scales Montreal, Canada. Ecological Indicators 8(6), 807-817. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.09.006. [Crossref]

  • [21] Wang, Z. & Yin, Q. (2011). Land use and landscape pattern changes in Nanjing during 1988-2007 (pp. 680-683). In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS),2011 IEEE International. Doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6049221. [Crossref]

  • [22] Yang, X. J. & Liu, Z. (2005). Quantifying landscape pattern and its change in an estuarine watershed using satellite imagery and landscape metrics. International Journal of RemoteSensing. 26(23), 5297-5323. Doi: 10.1080/01431160500219273. [Crossref]

  • [23] Yu, X., Ng, C. (2006). An integrated evaluation of landscape change using remote sensing and landscape metrics: a case study of Panyu, Guangzhou. International Journal ofRemote Sensing 27(6), 1075-1092. Doi: 10.1080/01431160500377162. [Crossref]

  • [24] Zhang, L., Kong F., Sun, Z., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the Land-use Suitability of Jinan City Based on GIS and Landscape Metrics. In 18th International Conference onGeoinformatics. Beijing: Peking University.

  • [25] Zomeni, M., Tzanopoulos, J. & Pantis, J. (2008). Historical analysis of landscape change using remote sensing techniques: An explanatory tool for agricultural transformation in Greek rural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning. 86(1), 38-46. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.12.006. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [26] Zonneveld, I. S. (1979). Land Evaluation and Land(scape) Science. Enschede: International Training Center.

About the article

Published Online: 2013-02-01

Published in Print: 2013-01-01



Citation Information: European Countryside, ISSN (Online) 1803-8417, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0004. Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in