Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.69

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.190
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.896

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1803-8417
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 3 (Sep 2017)

Issues

Informal Planning in Depopulating Rural Areas

A resource-based view on informal planning practices

Josefina Syssner / Marlies Meijer
Published Online: 2017-10-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0027

Abstract

Planning research has increasingly recognised that planning in depopulating areas differs from planning in growth areas. Several studies have sought to identify planning theories and strategies that are capable of meeting the challenges presented by depopulating areas. However, most of these studies and strategies are based on dense urban environments. This paper seeks to add to planning theory and practice by focusing on informal planning practices in rural depopulating areas. Starting from a resource-based view, the paper introduces an analytical framework that allows a systematic examination of the resources that are generated through informal planning practices in such areas.

Keywords: Planning; informality; informal planning; resource-based approach; resource-based theory

Academic references

  • [1] Abbas, T. & Commandeur, L. (2012). Modern Noaberschap: Hype of houvast. Authors’ edition.Google Scholar

  • [2] Altrock, U. (2012). Conceptualising informality: Some thoughts on the way towards generalisation. In McFarlane, C. & Waibel, M., ed., Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal (pp. 171–194). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • [3] Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update 33(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

  • [4] Bathelt, H. & Glückler, J. (2005). Resources in economic geography: From substantive concepts towards a relational perspective. Environment and Planning A 37(9), 1545–1563. DOI: 10.1068/a37109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Bontje, M. (2005). Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal, 61(1), pp. 13–21. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-005-0843-2.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(3), 367–394. DOI: 10.1093/jpart/mug027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Brown, W. A., Andersson, F. O. & Jo, S. (2015). Dimensions of capacity in nonprofit human service organizations. Voluntas 27(6), 2889–2912. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9633-8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2007). Putting the resource-based view of strategy and distinctive competencies to work in public organizations. Public Administration Review 67(4), 702–717. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00754.x.Google Scholar

  • [9] Constantin, J. A. & Lusch, R. F. (1994). Understanding Resource Management: How to Deploy Your People, Products, and Processes for Maximum Productivity. Oxford, OH: The Planning Forum.Google Scholar

  • [10] Denk, T. (2002). Komparativ metod – förståelse genom jämförelse, Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

  • [11] Forester, J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • [12] Haase, D. (2008). Urban ecology of shrinking cities: An unrecognized opportunity? Nature and Culture 3(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.3167/nc.2008.030101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Hall, P. & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2010). Urban and Regional Planning (5th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • [14] Häuβermann, H. & Siebel, W. (1987). Neue Urbanität. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

  • [15] Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

  • [16] Hermelin, B. & Magnusson, D. (2015). Effektstudie fibernät: Utbyggnad av fibernät på Linköpings landsbygd. Linköping: Linköpings Kommun.Google Scholar

  • [17] Hospers, G-J. & Reverda, N. (2015). Managing Population Decline in Europe's Urban and Rural Areas. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.Google Scholar

  • [18] Hospers, G-J. (2014). Policy responses to urban shrinkage: From growth thinking to civic engagement. European Planning Studies 22(7), 1507–1523. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.793655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Kempenaar, A., van Lierop, M., Westerink, J., van der Valk, A. & van den Brink, A. (2016). Change of thought: Findings on planning for shrinkage from a regional design competition. Planning Practice & Research 31(1), 23–40. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1088242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Kušar, S. (2010). Landscape studies informal planning practices: Some evidence from Slovenia. Journal of Landscape Studies 3(3), 159–165.Google Scholar

  • [21] Landmann, T. (2003). Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics, An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • [22] Madhavaram, S. & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: Developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. JOUR. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(1), 67–82. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0063-z.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Marsh, D. & Mackie, T. (1995). The Comparative Method. In Marsh, D. & Stoker, G., eds., Theory and Methods in Political Science (pp. 173–188). London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

  • [24] Martinez-Fernandez, C., Audirac, I., Fol, S. & Cunningham-Sabot, E. (2012). Shrinking cities: Urban challenges of globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(2), 213–225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01092.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] McFarlane, C. & Waibel, M. (eds.). (2012). Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • [26] Meyer, G. (2006). Formal institutions and informal politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar

  • [27] Mukhija, V. & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Reading the informal city: Why and how to deepen planners’ understanding of informality. Journal of Planning Education and Research 35(4), 444–454. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X15591586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Murray, M. (2010). Participatory Rural Planning. Exploring Evidence from Ireland. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • [29] Németh, J. & Hollander, J. (2016). Right-sizing shrinking cities: A landscape and design strategy for abandoned properties. Journal of Landscape Architecture 11(2), 90–100. DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2016.1188578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Nilsson, K. L. (2007). Managing complex spatial planning processes. Planning Theory & Practice 8(4), 431–447. DOI: 10.1080/14649350701664473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • [32] Nyström, J. & Tonell, L. (2012). Planeringens grunder. En översikt. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

  • [33] Pallagst, K., Schwarz, T., Popper, F. J. & Hollander, J. B. (2009). Planning shrinking cities. Progress in Planning 72(4), 223–232.Google Scholar

  • [34] Pee, L. G. & Kankanhalli, A. (2016). Interactions among factors influencing knowledge management in public-sector organizations: A resource-based view. Government Information Quarterly 33(1), 188–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Pink, S. & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction 36(3), 351–361. DOI: 10.1002/symb.66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Ragin, C. & Hein, J. (1993). The Comparative Study of Ethnicity. In Stanfield, J. H & Dennis, R. M., eds., Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods (pp. 254–272), Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage.Google Scholar

  • [37] Ragin, C. (1994). Constructing Social Research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • [38] Reimer, M., Getimis, P. & Blotevogel, H. H. (2014). Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective. In Reimer, M., Getimis, P. & Blotevogel, H. H., eds., Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes (pp. 1–20). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • [39] Richardson, T. (2000). Discourses of rurality in EU spatial policy: The European spatial development perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 40(1), 53–71. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and Miscomparing, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), pp. 243–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Schatzman, L. & Strauss, A. L. (1973). Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • [42] Sousa, S. & Pinho, P. (2015). Planning for shrinkage: Paradox or paradigm. European Planning Studies 23(1), 12–32. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.820082.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Syssner, J. (2014). Politik för kommuner som krymper. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar

  • [44] Syssner, J. (2015). Planning for shrinkage: Policy implications of demographic decline. AGER, Journal of Depopulation and Rural Development Studies 20(1), 7–31. DOI: 10.4422/ager.2015.14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] van der Valk, A. (2002). The Dutch planning experience. Landscape and Urban Planning 58(2–4), 201–210. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00221-3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Vaske, J. J. & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education 32(4), 16–21. DOI: 10.1080/00958960109598658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47] Walter, A. (2013). Does informality matter in German local policy making? German Policy Studies 9(1), 69–102.Google Scholar

  • [48] Wänström, J. (2013). Communicative planning processes – Involving the citizens. In Lundström, M. J., Fredriksson, C. & Witzel, J., ed., Planning and Sustainable Urban Development in Sweden (pp. 157–167). Stockholm: Föreningen för samhällsplanering.Google Scholar

  • [49] Wiechmann, T. & Pallagst, K. M. (2012). Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A comparison of transformation patterns and local strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(2), 261–280. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01095.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50] Wiechmann, T. (2008). Errors expected aligning urban strategy with demographic uncertainty in shrinking cities. International Planning Studies 13(4), 431–446. DOI: 10.1080/13563470802519097.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Other sources

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-07

Published in Print: 2017-09-01


Citation Information: European Countryside, ISSN (Online) 1803-8417, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0027.

Export Citation

© 2017 Josefina Syssner et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in