Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.69

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.190
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.896

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 3


Methods for the Assessment of Rural Social Infrastructure Needs

Gintarė Vaznonienė
  • Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Faculty of Economics and Management, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Studentu Str. 11, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Rasa Pakeltienė
  • Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Faculty of Economics and Management, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Studentu Str. 11, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-10-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0031


This article reveals the importance of different methods for assessment of social infrastructure (SI) development needs in rural areas. Rural social infrastructure is a significant element of rural territories interpreted in different ways: as social and economic system, basic services for local community, social bridge for integrating different social groups into the society, important factor for satisfaction of rural people’s needs and acknowledgement of their human rights. Besides the mentioned importance of SI to rural areas and rural community, the lack of exploration of methods for analysis of the needs for developing rural social infrastructure has been noticed in the scientific literature. The research aim is therefore to analyse the methods for assessment of needs of rural social infrastructure. The research question has been set accordingly: how different methods for need analysis could be applied to social infrastructure planning and development? The research results show that need analysis is generally linked to various methods, but for the SI planning, development and implementation specifically, there are certain methods, the application of which depends on specifics of rural areas (as territory) and features of local community.

Keywords: rural social infrastructure; rural area; rural community; needs assessment methods

Academic references

  • [1] Ahgren, B., Axelsson, S. B., & Axelsson, R. (2009). Evaluating intersectoral collaboration: a model for assessment by service users. International Journal of Integrated Care 9(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Atkočiūnienė, V. (2000). Lietuvos kaimo socialinė infrastruktūra; ekonominis vertinimas ir plėtra [PhD. Theses]. Kaunas: Aleksandras Strulginskis University.Google Scholar

  • [3] Atkočiūnienė, V., Aleksandravičius, A., Kiaušienė, I., Vaznonienė, G., Pakeltienė, R. & Lukė, R. (2014). Kaimo socialinės infrastruktūros vystymasis siekiant užtikrinti teritorinę ir socialinę sanglaudą: mokslo studija Kaunas: Aleksandro Stulginskio universitetas.Google Scholar

  • [4] Bivainis, J. & Vilkaitė, N. (2010). Vartotojų lojalumo nustatymo metodinio potencialo analizė. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, nr. 11(1), 49–60.Google Scholar

  • [5] Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachement as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3), 497–529. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Engle, M., & Altschuld, J. W. (2014). Needs assessment: The perspective from the public sector. In J. W. Altschuld & R. Watkins (Eds.), Needs assessment: Trends and a view toward the future. New Directions for Evaluation (pp. 33–45). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • [7] Israel, B. (1985). Social Networks and Social Support: Implications for Natural Helper and Community Level Interventions. Health Education Quarterly, 12(1), 65–80. DOI: 10.1177/109019818501200106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Gabdrakhmanov, N. K. & Rubtsov, V. A. (2014). The Objects of Social Infrastructure in the Social Image of the Region Shaping. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences. 140, 419–421. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.446.Google Scholar

  • [9] Kondrotaitė, G. (2012). Evaluation of the quality of public services in Lithuanian municipalities. Intellectual Economics 6, (3), 393–411.Google Scholar

  • [10] Kulbickienė, L. (2004). Lietuvos gyventojų kultūriniai poreikiai: kultūros įstaigų vertinimas ir lankymas. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 8(2), 64–71.Google Scholar

  • [11] Lewin, K. (1946). Action-research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2(4), 34–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Marcinkevičiūtė, L. & Petrauskienė, R. (2007). Socialinių paslaugų teikimo tobulinimo aktualijos kaimiškose seniūnijose. Viešoji politika ir administravimas. 27, 28–37.Google Scholar

  • [13] Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F. & Jason, L., eds, Researching Community Psychology (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10073-005.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Teriman, S., Yigitcanlar, T. & Mayere, S. (2011). Social infrastructure planning and sustainable community: example from south east Queensland, Australia. In: Jahan, N., ed., Proceedings of the Business and Social Science Research Conference 2011 (pp. 1–12). Melbourne: World Business Institute Australia.Google Scholar

  • [15] Vaznonienė, G. (2015). The role of rural community enhancing rural social infrastructure changes. Research for Rural Development. International Scientific Conference Proceedings (Latvia) 2, 176–182.Google Scholar

  • [16] Yessengeldina, A., Sitenko, D. & Seitalinova, A. (2014). The Development of Social Infrastructure in Kazakhstan. Public Policy and Administration. 13(2), 222–231. DOI: 10.13165/VPA-14-13-2-03.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Zikienė, K. (2009). Vartotojų lojalumas: pakeitimo elgsenos formavimo modelis. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos – kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai, 18(3), 89–97.Google Scholar

  • [18] Wang, C. & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health education and behavior 24(3), 369–387. DOI: 10.1177/109019819702400309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Weber, B., Alfen, H. W. & Staub-Bisang, M. (2016). Infrastructure as an Asset Class–Investment Strategy, Sustainability, Project finance and PPP. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Other sources

About the article

Published Online: 2017-10-07

Published in Print: 2017-09-01

Citation Information: European Countryside, Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 526–540, ISSN (Online) 1803-8417, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0031.

Export Citation

© 2017 Gintarė Vaznonienė et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in