Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.69

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.190
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.896

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1803-8417
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 4

Issues

Performance Agent Groups in the Promotion of Smart Economic Growth

Ass. Prof. Dr. hist. Maiga Krūzmētra / Prof. Dr. habil. oec Baiba Rivža / Prof. Dr. soc. Jonas Jasaitis
Published Online: 2018-01-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0046

Abstract

Any country is interested in economic growth regardless of its development level in any period; yet an increasingly important role in defining growth is played by the term ‘smart growth’. The EU development strategy until 2020 defines smart growth as a strategic objective. Smart growth does not take place automatically. It is affected both by the condition of the economic, social and natural environments and by subjective factors - the competence of performance agents. The present research distinguished three groups of rural space and regional performance agents: national institutions, local governments and communities of residents of the territories examined by the research. The research summarised the opinions of experts (Latvia n=171; Lithuania n=163) from the south-eastern part of Latvia and the north-eastern part of Lithuania with the purpose of assessing the contribution of the performance agent groups to the promotion of smart economic growth. The research aimed to identify the positive indications of the contribution made by each performance agent group as well as the largest problems affecting the promotion of smart economic growth in each country. Despite the fact that the sample groups were not representative (did not reflect the views of the entire population), the obtained survey data and the results of this analysis provided insight into the performance agents’ action ratings from the bottom-up position and allowed comparing the situations in Latvia and Lithuania. The research has become an urgent task in project No. 5.2.3 “Rural and Regional Development Processes and Opportunities in Latvia in the Context of Knowledge Economy” in National Research Programme 5.2. "Economic Transformation, Smart Growth, Governance and Legal Framework for the State and Society for Sustainable Development - a New Approach to the Creation of a Sustainable Learning Community: EKOSOC-LV”.

Keywords: governance; performance; performance agent groups; smart growth

References

  • [1] Ambrosio-Albalá, M. & Bastiaensen, J. (2010). The new territorial paradigm of rural development: Theoretical foundations from systems and institutional theories [discussion paper]. Antwerpen university.Google Scholar

  • [2] Backstrand, K. (2003). Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics 3(4), pp. 24-41. DOI: 10.1162/152638003322757916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Bariss, V. (2009). Publiska administracija. Jelgava: Latvia University of Agriculture.Google Scholar

  • [4] Bovaird, T. & Loffen, E., eds. (2009). Public management and Governance. 2nd ed. Abingdonon-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • [5] Draskovic, M. & Streimikiene, D. (2017). Foreword. In Sustainable Development: Crisis or Regulation? (pp. 19-23). Podgorica: ELIT.Google Scholar

  • [6] Heinrich, C. J. & Lynn, J. R., eds. (2000). Governance and Performance. New Perspectives. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

  • [7] Graham, J., Amos, B., Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21th Century. Policy Brief No. 15. Retrieved: Google Scholar

  • [8] Jasaitis, J. (2014). Alterations of the Role of Non-Urbanized and Low-Urbanized Areas in the Network Society. Review of Research Works. Vilnius: BMK Publishers.Google Scholar

  • [9] Littoz-Monnet, A. (2015). Ethics Experts as an Instrument of Technocratic Governance: Evidence from EU Medical Biotechnology Policy. Governance 28(3), 357-372. DOI: 10.1111/gove.12102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] North, D. C. (2004). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press (p. 154).Google Scholar

  • [11] Paula, L. (2015). Capability of Communities as Precondition for Sustainability of Rural Areas. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference “Economic Science for Rural Development” No 38 (pp. 103-112). Jelgava, Latvia Agricultural University.Google Scholar

  • [12] Pierre, J., ed. (2002). Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford University Press (pp. 241-246).Google Scholar

  • [13] Pukis, M. (2010). Pašu valdība. Latvijas pašvaldību pieredze, idejas un nākotnes redzējums. Rīga: Latvijas Pašvaldību Savienība.Google Scholar

  • [14] Razafindrakoto, M. & Roubaud, F. (2010). Are International Databases on Corruption Reliable? A Comparison of Expert Opinion Surveys and Household Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 38(8), 1057-1069. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.02.004.Google Scholar

  • [15] Vaus, D. de (2014). Survey in Social Research. 6th ed. Routledge, London and New York, (p. 382).Google Scholar

  • [16] Vidickiene, D., Melnikiene, R. & Gedminaite-Raudone, Z. (2014b). Development of Lithuanian Rural Regions Towards Knowledge Society. In Wrzochalska, A., ed., Rural economies in Central Eastern European Countries after EU enlargement (pp. 47-65). Warszawa: Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Zywnosciowej.Google Scholar

  • [17] Zvirgzdina, R. & Pelse, M. (2012). Development Possibilities of Farms in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings 28, 133-138.Google Scholar

  • [18] European Commission (2014a). The Role of Government Institutions for Smart Specialisation and Regional Development. IRC Technical reports. IRC. Retrieved: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC88935.pdf. Access: 9.01.2017.Google Scholar

  • [19] European Commission (2014b). Community-led Local Development. Cohesion Policy. Retrieved: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/dicgener/informat/2014/community_en.pf. Access: 5.01.2017.Google Scholar

  • [20] Keller, J. W (s.a.). The Importance of Rural Development in the 21st Century - Persistence, Sustainability, and Futures. The Regional Institute. Online Publishing. Retrieved: http://www.regional.org.au/au/countrytowns/keynote/keller.htm. Access: 10.01.2017.Google Scholar

  • [21] Policy Performance and Governance Capacities in the OECD and EU. Sustainable Governance Indicators, 2016. Retrieved: http://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/de/layer/publikationen/publikation/did/policy-performance-and-governanacecapacities-in-the-oecd-and-eu/.Google Scholar

  • [22] Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017 (2016). WEF. Retrieved: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1. Access: 4.01.2017.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-01-13

Published in Print: 2017-12-20


Citation Information: European Countryside, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 822–831, ISSN (Online) 1803-8417, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0046.

Export Citation

© by Maiga Krūzmētra. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in