Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

European Journal of Applied Linguistics

Founded by Knapp, Karlfried

Editor-in-Chief: Bührig, Kristin / ten Thije, Jan D.


Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
2192-953X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

How to be polite with emojis: a pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment

Michael Beißwenger
  • Corresponding author
  • Universität Duisburg-Essen, Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften, Institut für Germanistik, Essen, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dr. Steffen Pappert
Published Online: 2019-06-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0003

References

  • Bedijs, Kristina, Gudrun Held & Christiane Maaß (eds.). 2014. Face Work and Social Media. Münster: Lit-Verlag:.Google Scholar

  • Beißwenger, Michael. 2015. Sprache und Medien: Digitale Kommunikation. In Studikurs Sprach- und Textverständnis. Hypermediales E-Learning-Angebot des Ministeriums für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung (MIWF) des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. https://www.studifinder.de/?ac=studyclass-overview / extended version: http://www.michael-beisswenger.de/pub/beisswenger_digikomm_preview.pdf (accessed 10 January 2019).

  • Beißwenger, Michael, Maria Ermakova, Alexander Geyken, Lothar Lemnitzer & Angelika Storrer. 2012. A TEI Schema for the Representation of Computer-mediated Communication. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative 3. DOI 10.4000/jtei.476 (accessed 10 January 2019).Google Scholar

  • Beißwenger, Michael, Marcel Fladrich, Wolfgang Imo & Evelyn Ziegler. 2018. News from the MoCoDa2 corpus: A design and web-based editing environment for collecting and refining data from private CMC interactions. In Reinhild Vandekerckhove, Darja Fišer & Lisa Hilte (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and Social Media Corpora (CMC-corpora 2018), 17–18 September 2018, University of Antwerp. Antwerp, 10–14. https://www.uantwerpen.be/images/uantwerpen/container49896/files/proceedings_CMCcorpora2018.pdf (accessed 25 January 2019).

  • Beißwenger, Michael & Lena Meyer. 2018. Ortho & Graf: ein Wiki-basiertes Planspiel zur Förderung von Rechtschreibkompetenzen in der Sekundarstufe II. In Steffen Gailberger & Frauke Wietzke (eds.), Deutschunterricht in einer digitalen Gesellschaft. Unterrichtsanregungen für die Sekundarstufen, 296–330. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar

  • Beißwenger, Michael & Lena Meyer. 2019, in press. Gamification als Schlüssel zu „trockenen“ Themen? Beobachtungen und Analysen zu einem webbasierten Planspiel zur Förderung orthographischer Kompetenz. In Karin Beckers & Marvin Wassermann (eds.), Wissenskommunikation im Web. Sprachwissenschaftliche und didaktische Perspektiven. (Transferwissenschaften). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Beißwenger, Michael & Steffen Pappert. 2018. Internetbasierte Kommunikation. In Frank Liedtke & Astrid Tuchen (eds.), Handbuch Pragmatik, 448–459. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cramer, Henriette, Paloma de Juan & Joel Tetreault. 2016. Sender-Intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504–509. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, doi>10.1145/2935334.2935370 (accessed 24 April 2019).Google Scholar

  • Danesi, Marcel. 2017. The Semiotics of Emoji. The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Dresner, Eli & Susan C. Herring. 2010. Functions of the non-verbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20, 249–268.Google Scholar

  • Dürscheid, Christa & Karina Frick. 2016. Schreiben Digital. Wie das Internet unsere Alltagskommunikation verändert. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar

  • Dürscheid, Christa & Christina M. Siever. 2017. Jenseits des Alphabets – Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 45(2), 256–285.Google Scholar

  • Fraser, Bruce. 2001. The form and function of politeness in conversation. In Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann & Sven F. Sager (eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Band 2, 1406–1425. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar

  • Ge, Jing & Susan C. Herring. 2018. Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo. First Monday, 23(11) (5 November). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/9413/7610 (accessed 10 January 2019).

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City/New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Graham, Sage L. 2017. Politeness and impoliteness. In Christian R. Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of Social Media (Handbook of Pragmatics 11), 459–491. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gumperz, John J. 1992. Contextualization revisited. In: Peter Auer & Aldo di Luzio (eds.), The Contextualization of Language, 39–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Herring, Susan C. & Ashley R. Dainas. 2017. “Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. Proceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50). IEEE: Los Alamitos, CA. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/hicss.graphicons.pdf (accessed 10 January 2019).

  • Hougaard, Tina Thode & Marianne Rathje. 2018. Emojis in the Digital Writings of Young Danes. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Jugendsprachen/Youth Languages: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/Current perspectives of international research, 773–806. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Imo, Wolfgang. 2015. Vom ikonischen über einen indexikalischen zu einem symbolischen Ausdruck? Eine konstruktionsgrammatische Analyse des Emoticons :-). In Jörg Bücker, Susanne Günthner & Wolfgang Imo (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V, 133–162. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar

  • Kavanagh, Barry. 2016. Emoticons as a medium for channeling politeness within American and Japanese online blogging communities. Language & Communication, 48, 53–65.Google Scholar

  • Kelly, Ryan & Leon Watts. 2015. Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. Paper presented at Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design, Oslo, Norway, 20 September. https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/characterising-the-inventive-appropriation-of-emoji-as-relational (accessed 10 January 2019).

  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2005. Politeness in France: How to Buy Bread Politely. In Leo Hickey & Miranda Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe, 29–44. Clevedon et al.: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar

  • Li, Li & Yue Yang (2018): Pragmatic functions of emoji in internetbased communication – a corpus-based study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education (2018) 3:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0057-z (accessed 10 January 2019).

  • Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action. Disagreements in Oral Communication (Language, Power and Social Process 12). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Locher, Miriam A. 2008. Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola, Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics 2, 509–540. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Locher, Miriam A. 2010. Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1), 1–5.Google Scholar

  • Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander & Nicole Höhn. 2015. Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards. Pragmatics 25(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

  • Ljubešić, Nikola & Darja Fišer. 2016. A Global Analysis of Emoji Usage. In Proceedings of the 10th Web as Corpus Workshop. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL Anthology W16–2610), 82–89. http://aclweb.org/anthology/W16–2610 (accessed 25 January 2019).

  • Pappert, Steffen. 2017. Zu kommunikativen Funktionen von Emojis in der WhatsApp-Kommunikation. In Michael Beißwenger (ed.), Empirische Erforschung internetbasierter Kommunikation (Empirische Linguistik/Empirical Linguistics 9), 175–211. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Selting, Margret. 1997. Interaktionale Stilistik. Methodologische Aspekte der Analyse von Sprechstilen. In Margret Selting & Barbara Sandig (eds.), Sprech- und Gesprächsstile, 9–43. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Siebenhaar, Beat. 2018. Funktionen von Emojis und Altersabhängigkeit ihres Gebrauchs in der WhatsApp-Kommunikation. In Arne Ziegler (ed.), Jugendsprachen/Youth Languages: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/Current perspectives of international research, 749–772. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Spina, Stefania. 2018. Role of Emoticons as Structural Markers in Twitter Interactions. Discourse Processes, doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1510654 (accessed 15 April 2019).Google Scholar

  • Skovholt, Karianne, Anette Grønning & Anne Kankaanranta. 2014. The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 780–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063 (accessed 10 January 2019).

  • Thaler, Verena. 2012. Sprachliche Höflichkeit in computervermittelter Kommunikation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar

  • Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Watts, Richard J. 2010. Linguistic politeness theory and its aftermath: Recent research trails. In Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham, (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 6), 43–70. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann & Bruno Strecker. (1997). Grammatik der deutschen Sprache (Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-06-28


Citation Information: European Journal of Applied Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 2192-953X, ISSN (Print) 2192-9521, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2019-0003.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in