Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Economists’ Voice

Ed. by Belke, Ansgar / Schnabl, Gunther

CiteScore 2017: 0.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.104
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.105

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 1


Ensuring Access to Fruits and Vegetables for the Nation’s Most Vulnerable – Contributions of WIC and SNAP

Dena R. Herman
  • Corresponding author
  • California State University, Northridge, Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330, USA, Phone: +(818) 677-4086
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-05-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2017-0005


The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are critical programs in the U.S. because they form the basis of the nation’s nutrition and hunger safety net. SNAP has large effect nationwide offering nutrition assistance to 1 in 7 low-income Americans, while WIC serves more than half of all infants in the U.S. and a quarter of all children ages 1-5 years. Despite the reach of these programs, there is still room for improvement, especially when it comes to increasing access to healthy food items and improving eating habits. The objective of this paper is to make recommendations for how WIC and SNAP can work better together to continue to incentivize purchases and support low-income population’s knowledge and access to healthier food choices, particularly those foods that have traditionally been most expensive – fruits and vegetables.

Keywords: fruits and vegetables; SNAP; WIC

  • Abrams, B 1993. “Preventing Low Birth Weight: Does WIC Work? A Review of Evaluations of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 678 (1): 306–315.Google Scholar

  • Almond, D., K. Y. Chay, and D. S. Lee. 2005. “The Costs of Low Birth Weight.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 1031–1083.Google Scholar

  • Andreyeva, T., J. Luedicke, A. E. Middleton, M. W. Long, and M. B. Schwartz. 2012. “Positive Influence of the Revised Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Food Packages on Access to Healthy Foods.” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 112 (6): 850–858.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, A. J., C. R. Richardson, M. Heisler, A. Sen, E. C. Murphy, O. B. Hesterman, M. M. Davis, and S. M. Zick. 2017. “Increasing Use of a Healthy Food Incentive: A Waiting Room Intervention Among Low-Income Patients.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 52 (2): 154–162.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Community Science. 2013. SNAP Healthy Food Incentives Cluster Evaluation 2013 Final Report https://fairfoodnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2013-Cluster-Evaluation-Final-Report_-final_10.4.13_Dec2013.pdf/. Published December 2013. March 6, 2017.

  • Cooke, L 2007. “The Importance of Exposure for Healthy Eating in Childhood: A Review.” Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 20 (4): 294–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, A., K. Banks, R. Jennings, E. Nehme, C. Nemec, S. Sharma, A. Hussaini, and A. Yaroch. 2015. “Increasing Access to Healthful Foods: A Qualitative Study with Residents of Low-Income Communities.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12 (1): S5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fair Food Network. 2014. Double Up Food Bucks: Five Year ReportAccessed March 6, 2017. https://fairfoodnetwork.org/resources/. Published August 2014.

  • Fair Food Network. 2016. Fair Food Fund 2015 Annual ReportAccessed March 6, 2017. https://fairfoodnetwork.org/resources/. Published August June 2016.

  • Figlio, D., S. Hamersma, and J. Roth. 2009. “Does Prenatal WIC Participation Improve Birth Outcomes? New Evidence from Florida.” Journal of Public Economics 93: 235–245.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Fingar, K. R., S. H. Lob, M. S. Dove, P. Gradziel, and M. P. Curtis. 2016. “Reassessing the Association between WIC and Birth Outcomes using a Fetuses-at-Risk Approach.” Maternal Child Health Journal 16: 1–11.Google Scholar

  • Food Research and Action Center (FRAC). 2017. Research Brief: A Brief Review of Strategies to Bolster SNAP’s Role in Improving Nutrition as well as Food Security February 2017.. Available from: http://frac.org/research/resource-library/review-strategies-bolster-snaps-role-improving-nutrition-well-food-security.

  • Harnack, L., J. M. Oakes, B. Elbel, T. Beatty, S. Rydell, and S. French. 2016. “Effects of Subsidies and Prohibitions on Nutrition in a Food Benefit Program. A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Internal Medicine 176 (11): 1610–1619.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Herman, D. R., G. G. Harrison, and E. Jenks. 2004. “The Effect of the WIC Program on Pregnant, First-Time Participants.” Fam Econ Nutr Rev 16: 21–27.Google Scholar

  • Herman, D. R., G. G. Harrison, and E. Jenks. 2006. “Choices made by Low-Income Women Provided with an Economic Supplement for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Purchase.” Journal of the American Dietetic Association 106: 740–744.Google Scholar

  • Herman, D. R., G. G. Harrison, and E. Jenks. 2008. “Targeted Subsidy Increases Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Low-Income Women.” American Journal of Public Health 98: 98–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoynes, H., M. Page, and A. H. Stevens. 2011. “Can Targeted Transfers Improve Birth Outcomes? Evidence from the Introduction of the WIC Program.” Journal of Public Economics 95: 813–827.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies. 2005. WIC Food Packages: Time for a Change Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

  • Mike, Beal 2016. The Past, Present, and Future of SNAP: Opportunities for Improving Access to Food. On Behalf of the National Grocers Association. Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture. Washington, DC.Accessed March 6, 2017. November 2016. http://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=105417.

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2017. Review of WIC Food Packages: Improving Balance and Choice: Final Report Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pan, L., D. S. Freedman, A. J. Sharma, K. Castellanos-Brown, S. Park, R. B. Smith, and H. M. Blanck. 2016. “Trends in Obesity Among Participants Aged 2–4 Years in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children – United States, 2000–2014.” MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65 (45): 1265–1260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6545a2 .Crossref

  • Rossin-Slater, M 2015. “Promoting Health in Early Childhood.” The Future of Children 25 (1): 35–64.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-25

Citation Information: The Economists' Voice, Volume 14, Issue 1, 20170005, ISSN (Online) 1553-3832, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2017-0005.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in