Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Economists’ Voice

Ed. by Belke, Ansgar / Schnabl, Gunther

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.104
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.105

Online
ISSN
1553-3832
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Secular Stagnation, Unemployment Hysteresis and Monetary Policy in EMU: Scratches but Not Scars?

Ansgar Belke
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (UDE), Essen, Germany
  • Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels, Belgium
  • King’s College London and Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-12-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2018-0034

Abstract

The strength of mutually reinforcing links between the demand and supply sides of the macroeconomy is an important issue for policymakers which has emerged from the financial crisis. The prevailing view that only cyclical policies influence the demand side, and structural policies affect the supply side has been challenged in two dimensions. Firstly, long periods of weak demand have the potential to lead to rising structural unemployment and a permanently lower capital stock – inducing hysteresis effects. Secondly, if one believes in the relevance of hysteresis in the form propagated by [Blanchard, Olivier J., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1986. “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual, edited by Fischer, S., Vol. 1, 15–78. Cambridge: MIT Press], stronger demand fueled, for instance, by monetary policy may, as a corollary, be able to reverse such effects. This paper argues that the Blanchard and Summers type of hysteresis should, however, not be taken literally and not taken as the basis of one-to-one into recommendations for monetary policy and/or the monetary policy strategy. We show that bluntly pointing to the hard form of “reverse hysteresis” and implementing bold counter-cyclical monetary (and fiscal) policies to cope with hysteretic unemployment is neither necessary nor sufficient. Instead, we argue that it is necessary to refer to subtler forms of hysteresis, which are more compatible with the data. These subtler forms still leave some room for monetary policy to maneuver, but in a much more complex way. If long-term unemployment is stagnating even during an upturn, they may even serve as a basis to recommend a contractionary monetary policy stance. At the same time, however, inequality which is causing persistent or even permanent demand deficiencies becomes relevant as hurdle for lower unemployment in the hysteresis context. Seen on the whole, thus, a second wave of hysteresis-based research on monetary policy options following the first wave in the 1980s should clearly be on the agenda.

Keywords: inflation; hysteresis; monetary policy; Phillips curve; secular stagnation; structural reforms; two-handed approach; unemployment

JEL Classification: E24; E42; E52

References

  • Auclert, Adrien, and Matthew Rognlie. 2018a. “Income Inequality and Aggregate Demand in the United States.” Web: http://equitablegrowth.org/research-analysis/income-inequality-and-aggregate-demand-in-the-united-states/.

  • Auclert, Adrien, and Matthew Rognlie. 2018b. “Inequality and Aggregate Demand.” NBER Working Paper No. 24280, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge/MA, February.Google Scholar

  • Ball, Laurence. 2009. “Hysteresis: Old and New Evidence.” In Understanding Inflation and the Implications for Monetary Policy: A Phillips Curve Retrospective, edited by Jeff Fuhrer, Yolanda K. Kodrzycki, Jane Sneddon Little, and Giovanni P. Olivei, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar

  • Ball, Laurence. 2014. “Long-Term Damage from the Great Recession in OECD Countries.” NBER Working Paper 20185, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge/MA.Google Scholar

  • Bean, Charles. 1998. “The Interaction of Aggregate-demand Policies and Labor-market Reform.” Swedish Economic Policy Review 5: 353–382.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar. 2002. “Towards a Balanced Policy Mix under EMU: Co-ordination of Macroeconomic Policies and ‘Economic Government’?” Journal of Economic Integration 17 (1): 21–53.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Matthias Goecke. 1999. “A Simple Model of Hysteresis in Employment under Exchange Rate Uncertainty.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 46 (3): 260–286.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Daniel Gros. 2003. “If the ECB Cuts Rates It Should Do So Boldly.” Financial Times International, 3 March, Comment & Analysis.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Matthias Goecke. 2005. “Real Options Effects on Employment: Does Exchange Rate Uncertainty Matter for Aggregation?” German Economic Review 6 (2): 185–203.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Florian Verheyen. 2014. “The Low Interest Rate Environment, Global Liquidity Spillovers and Challenges for Monetary Policy Ahead.” Comparative Economic Studies 56 (2): 313–334.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Daniel Gros. 2017. “Optimal Adjustment Paths in a Monetary Union.” Economic Modelling 67: 338–345.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Jens Klose. 2017. “Equilibrium Real Interest Rates and Secular Stagnation: An Empirical Analysis for Euro Area Member Countries.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (6): 1221–1238.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Timo Baas. 2018. “Oil Price Shocks, Monetary Policy and Current Account Imbalances within a Currency Union, Centre for European Policy Studies.” CEPS Working Document 2018/01, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, January.Google Scholar

  • Belke, Ansgar, and Thomas Osowski. 2018. “International Effects of Euro Area versus US Policy Uncertainty: A FAVAR Approach.” Economic Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12701.

  • Belke, Ansgar, Matthias Goecke, and Laura Werner. 2014. “Hysteresis Effects in Economics – Different Methods for Describing Economic Path-dependence.” In Hysteresis – Types, Applications and Behavior Patterns in Complex Systems, edited by José Carlos Dias, 19–42. New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Bell, David N., and David G. Blanchflower. 2011. “Young People and the Great Recession.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 27: 241–267.Google Scholar

  • Bentolila, Samuel, J. Ignacio García-Pérez, and Marcel Jansen. 2017. “Are the Spanish Long-Term Unemployed Unemployable?” CESifo Working Paper No. 6338, CESifo, Munich.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, Olivier J. 2003. Monetary Policy and Unemployment, remarks at: Monetary Policy and the Labor Market: A Conference in Honor of James Tobin, New York: New School, November 2002.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, Olivier J., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1986. “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual, edited by Fischer, S., Vol. 1, 15–78. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, Olivier J., Rudiger Dornbusch, Jacques Dreze, Herbert Giersch, Richard Layard, Mario Monti. 1986. “Employment and Growth in Europe – A Two-handed Approach.” In Restoring Europe’s Prosperity, edited by Blanchard, Olivier J., Rudiger Dornbusch, Richard, 95–124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, Olivier J., Eugenio M. Cerutti, and Lawrence H. Summers. 2015. “Inflation and Activity – Two Explorations and they Monetary Policy Implications.” NBER Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • Buiter, Willem H. 2015. “How to Tackle Secular Stagnation.” World Economic Forum. 8 June, web: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/06/how-to-tackle-secular-stagnation/.

  • Buiter, Willem H., Ebrahim Rahbari, and Joe Seydl. 2015. “Secular Stagnation: The Time for One-armed Policy Is Over.” VoxEU, 5 June.Google Scholar

  • Caballero, Ricardo J., and Robert S. Pindyck. 1996. “Uncertainty, Investment, and Industry Evolution.” International Economic Review 37 (3): 641–666.Google Scholar

  • Cacciatore, Matteo, Romain Duval, Giuseppe Fiori, and Fabio Ghironi. 2017. “Market Reforms at the Zero Lower Bound.” 48th Konstanz Seminar, May 31 to June 1.Google Scholar

  • Calmfors, Lars. 1998. “Macroeconomic Policy, Wage Setting and Employment – What Difference Does the EMU Make?” Oxford Economic Policy Review 14: 125–151.Google Scholar

  • Coe, David T., and Dennis J. Snower. 1997. “Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labor Market Reform.” IMF Staff Papers 44 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar

  • Cœuré, Benoît. 2017. Scars or Scratches? Hysteresis in the Euro Area, Speech by Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, Geneva: at the International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies. 19 May, Web: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp170519.en.html.

  • Cross, Rod. 1988. Unemployment, Hysteresis & the Natural Rate Hypothesis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Cross, Rod, and Andrew Allan. 1988. “On the History of Hysteresis.” In Unemployment, Hysteresis and the Natural Rate Hypothesis, edited by Cross R., 26–38. Oxford/New York.Google Scholar

  • DeLong, J. Bradford, and Lawrence H. Summers. 2012. “Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 44 (1): 233–297.Google Scholar

  • Di Bella, Gabriel, Francesco Grigoli, and Francisco Ramirez. 2018. “Is Unemployment on Steroids in Advanced Economies?” IMF Working Paper, 18/69, International Monetary Fund, Washington/DC.Google Scholar

  • Draghi, Mario. 2014. “Unemployment in the Euro Area, Speech by the President of the ECB, Annual Central Bank Symposium.” Jackson Hole. 22 August, Web: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2014/html/sp140822.en.html.

  • Draghi, Mario. 2015. “Structural Reforms, Inflation and Monetary Policy, Introductory Speech by the President of the ECB, ECB Forum on Central Banking.” Sintra. 22 May, Web: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2015/html/sp150522.en.html.

  • Erceg, Christopher J., and Andrew T. Levin. 2013. “Labor Force Participation and Monetary Policy in the Wake of the Great Recession.” IMF Working Paper WP/13/245, International Monetary Fund, Washington/DC, July.Google Scholar

  • Fatás, Antonio, and Lawrence H. Summers. 2016. “Hysteresis and Fiscal Policy During the Global Crisis.” VoxEU. 11 October.Google Scholar

  • Fatás, Antonio, and Lawrence H. Summers. 2017. “The Permanent Effects of Fiscal Consolidations.” Journal of International Economics 112: 238–250.Google Scholar

  • FOMC. 2017. “Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy.” adopted effective January 24, 2012, amended effective January 31, 2017, web: www.federalreserve.gov.

  • Friedman, Milton. 1968. “The Role of Monetary Policy.” The American Economic Review 58 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar

  • Krugman, Paul. 1989. Exchange Rate Instability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Lagarde, Christine. 2016. We Need Forceful Policies to Avoid the Low-Growth Trap. Washington/DC: International Monetary Fund. 1 September, Web: https://blogs.imf.org/2016/09/01/we-need-forceful-policies-to-avoid-the-low-growth-trap/.

  • Lindbeck, Assar, and Dennis J. Snower. 1988. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Mayergoyz, Isaak D. 1986. “Mathematical Models of Hysteresis.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 22: 603–608.Google Scholar

  • Mayergoyz, Isaak D. 2003. Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and Their Applications. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • McKinnon, Ronald I. 1963. “Optimum Currency Areas.” In American Economic Reviw, Vol. 53, 717–724.Google Scholar

  • Minsky, Hyman. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mundell, Robert A. 1963. “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas.” American Economic Review 51 (4): 657–665.Google Scholar

  • Phelps, Edmund S. 1972. Inflation Policy and Unemployment Theory – The Cost-Benefit Approach to Monetary Planning. London.Google Scholar

  • Preisach, Ferenc. 1935. “Über die magnetische Nachwirkung.” Zeitschrift für Physik 94: 277–302.Google Scholar

  • Reifschneider, Dave, William L. Wascher, and David Wilcox. 2015. “Aggregate Supply in the United States: Recent Developments and Implications for the Conduct of Monetary Policy.” IMF Economic Review 63 (1): 71–109.Google Scholar

  • Rudebusch, Glenn D., and John C. Williams. 2016. “A Wedge in the Dual Mandate: Monetary Policy and Long-term Unemployment.” In Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 47/A, 5–18.Google Scholar

  • Sachs, Jeffrey D. 1986. High Unemployment in Europe: Diagnosis and Policy Implications, NBER Working Paper Series 1830. Cambridge/MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

  • Stockhammer, Engelbert, and Simon Sturn. 2012. “The Impact of Monetary Policy on Unemployment Hysteresis.” Applied Economics 44 (21): 2743–2756.Google Scholar

  • Summers, Lawrence. 2014a. “Reflections on the New ’Secular Stagnation Hypothesis’.” VoxEU, 30 October.Google Scholar

  • Summers, Lawrence. 2014b. “U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound.” Business Economics 49 (2): 65–73.Google Scholar

  • Summers, Lawrence. 2015. “Demand Side Secular Stagnation.” American Economic Review 105 (5): 60–65.Google Scholar

  • Svensson, Lars E. 2017. The Relation between Monetary Policy and Financial-Stability Policy. Stockholm: Mimeo. Web: https://larseosvensson.se/files/papers/relation-between-monetary-policy-and-financial-stability-policy.pdf.

  • Teulings, Coen, and Richard Baldwin, eds. 2014. Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures, A VoxEU.org Book. London: CEPR Press.Google Scholar

  • Van Aarle, Bas. 2016. “Secular Stagnation: Insights from a New Keynesian Model with Hysteresis Effects.” CESifo Working Paper No. 5797, CESifo Munich.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-12-04


Citation Information: The Economists’ Voice, 20180034, ISSN (Online) 1553-3832, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2018-0034.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in