Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Forum for Health Economics & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Goldman, Dana

CiteScore 2017: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.425
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.297

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Can Multi-payer Financing Achieve Single-Payer Spending Levels?

Joseph P Newhouse / Anna Sinaiko
Published Online: 2008-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-9544.1091

Many believe the high level of United States health care costs compared with other countries is attributable to high administrative costs inherent in our pluralistic health care financing system. Instead of the well known statistics examining the percentage of GDP that various countries spend on health care, which show the US as a large outlier, we show the percentage of Gross State Product various states spend on health care. Even adjusting for age and income, there is considerable variation across the states in spending levels, with the lowest quintile of states spending approximately the same percentage as the higher spending OECD countries other than the US. This implies that the US' pluralistic financing system may not be an important cause of the large percentage of GDP that the US devotes to health care. Even in the low spending states, however, absolute amounts of spending are higher than in other OECD countries. Although a more centralized payment system may be a sufficient condition to spend at the percentages of GDP found in northern Europe, it is not a necessary condition.

Keywords: administrative costs; US health care spending

About the article

Published Online: 2008-04-01

Citation Information: Forum for Health Economics & Policy, Volume 10, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1558-9544, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-9544.1091.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in