Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Forum for Health Economics & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Goldman, Dana


CiteScore 2017: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.425
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.297

Online
ISSN
1558-9544
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Transformation of Medicare, 2015 to 2030

Henry J. Aaron
  • Corresponding author
  • The Bruce and Virginia MacLaury Chair, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution – Economic Studies, 1775 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 200036, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Robert Reischauer
Published Online: 2015-11-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0043

Abstract

Medicare today is a better program on almost every dimension than it was just after July 30, 1965 when Lyndon Johnson signed public law 89–97. Nonetheless, short-comings, limitations, and inadequacies remain. What should be done to make Medicare a better program? What should Medicare look like in 2030? In this paper we try to answer these questions. Three perspectives are relevant: that of beneficiaries, current and future; that of policymakers and administrators, the program’s stewards; and that of society at large. We posit certain objectives and goals that we believe – and that we think a broad swath of Americans would agree – should be pursued to improve the Medicare program. Those goals include (a) affordability for Medicare beneficiaries, (b) affordability for the working population that is paying and should continue to pay for much of the current cost of the program, (c) reduction in what we regard as needless complexity, and (d) stability and continuity in several different senses. We restrict ourselves to changes that we judge to be affordable and feasible – politically, technically, and administratively – if not today, then over the next decade or two. We believe that changes in Medicare will remain incremental, as they have been for the last 50 years. We shall assume that the ACA takes root and that the exchanges, whether managed by states or by the federal government on behalf of the states, continue to operate. We shall assume that federal and state officials eventually surmount the administrative challenges they still confront. In particular, we assume that the exchanges come to serve a growing share of the American population and that they increasingly exercise the rather considerable regulatory powers over insurance offerings that the ACA grants to them. We divide Medicare reforms into four categories: payment reform, benefit reform, quality reform and management, and the role of private insurance plans (Medicare Advantage [MA]).

Keywords: Medicare

About the article

Corresponding author: Henry J. Aaron, The Bruce and Virginia MacLaury Chair, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution – Economic Studies, 1775 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 200036, USA, e-mail: ;


Published Online: 2015-11-17

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Forum for Health Economics and Policy, Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 119–136, ISSN (Online) 1558-9544, ISSN (Print) 2194-6191, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0043.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in