Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Forum for Health Economics & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Goldman, Dana

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.30

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.140
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.098

Online
ISSN
1558-9544
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Long-Term Impact of Price Controls in Medicare Part D

Gigi Moreno / Emma van Eijndhoven / Jennifer Benner / Jeffrey Sullivan
Published Online: 2017-01-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2016-0011

Abstract

Price controls for prescription drugs are once again at the forefront of policy discussions in the United States. Much of the focus has been on the potential short-term savings – in terms of lower spending – although evidence suggests price controls can dampen innovation and adversely affect long-term population health. This paper applies the Health Economics Medical Innovation Simulation, a microsimulation of older Americans, to estimate the long-term impacts of government price setting in Medicare Part D, using pricing in the Federal Veterans Health Administration program as a proxy. We find that VA-style pricing policies would save between $0.1 trillion and $0.3 trillion (US$2015) in lifetime drug spending for people born in 1949–2005. However, such savings come with social costs. After accounting for innovation spillovers, we find that price setting in Part D reduces the number of new drug introductions by as much as 25% relative to the status quo. As a result, life expectancy for the cohort born in 1991–1995 is reduced by almost 2 years relative to the status quo. Overall, we find that price controls would reduce lifetime welfare by $5.7 to $13.3 trillion (US$2015) for the US population born in 1949–2005.

Keywords: innovation; Medicare; prescription drugs; price controls; simulation

References

  • Acemoglu, D. and J. Linn (2004) “Market Size in Innovation: Theory and Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3):1049–1090.Google Scholar

  • Adams, P., M. D. Hurd, D. McFadden, A. Merrill, and T. Ribeiro (2004) “Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise? Tests for Direct Causal Paths between Health and Socioeconomic Status.” In: (David A. Wise, ed.) Perspectives on the Economics of Aging. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 415–518.Google Scholar

  • David, E., T. Tramontin, and R. Zemmel (2009) “Pharmaceutical R&D: The Road to Positive Returns,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 8(8):609–610.Google Scholar

  • DiMasi, J. A. and H. G. Grabowski (2007) “The Cost of Biopharmaceutical R&D: Is Biotech Different?” Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(4–5):469–479.Google Scholar

  • Goldman, D. P., M. Hurd, P. G. Shekelle, S. J. Newberry, C. W. A. Panis, B. Shang, J. Bhattacharya, G. F. Joyce, and D. N. Lakdawalla (2004) Health Status and Medical Treatment of the Future Elderly: Final Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available from http://www.rand.org/publications/TR/TR169/.

  • Goldman, D. P., B. Shang, J. Bhattacharya, A. M. Garber, M. Hurd, G. F. Joyce, D. N. Lakdawalla, C. Panis, and P. G. Shekelle (2005) “Consequences of Health Trends and Medical Innovation for the Future Elderly,” Health Affairs, 24(Suppl 2):W5R5–17.Google Scholar

  • Heckman, J. and B. Singer (1984) “A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data,” Econometrica, 52(2):271–320.Google Scholar

  • Lakdawalla, D. N., D. P. Goldman, and B. Shang (2005) “The Health and Cost Consequences of Obesity Among the Future Elderly,” Health Affairs (Millwood), 24(Suppl 2):W5R30–41.Google Scholar

  • Schacht, W. H. and J. R. Thomas (2012) Follow-on Biologics: The Law and Intellectual Property Issues. Washington, DC, USA: Congressional Research Services.Google Scholar

  • Serebrov, M. (2013) “Biologic New Molecular Entities Approvals are Nothing to Write Home About.”Google Scholar

  • Shekelle, P. G., E. Ortiz, S. J. Newberry, M. W. Rich, S. L. Rhodes, R. H. Brook, and D. P. Goldman (2005) “Identifying Potential Health Care Innovations for the Future Elderly,” Health Affairs (Millwood), 24(Suppl 2):W5R67–76.Google Scholar

  • Sood, N., H. De Vries, I. Gutierrez, D. N. Lakdawalla, and D. P. Goldman (2008) The Effect of Pharmaceutical Regulation on Revenues. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar

  • Truven Health Analytics Micromedex Solutions (2016) RedBook Online. Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics.Google Scholar

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (2014) Novel New Drugs 2013 Summary. Accessed March 25, 2016. Available from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DrugInnovation/UCM381803.pdf.

References

  • Abbott, T. A. and J. A. Vernon (2007) “The Cost of US Pharmaceutical Price Regulation: A Financial Simulation Model of R&D Decisions,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(4–5):293–306.Google Scholar

  • Acemoglu, D. and J. Linn (2004) “Market Size in Innovation: Theory and Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3):1049–1090.Google Scholar

  • Aldy, J. E. and W. K. Viscusi (2008) “Adjusting the Value of a Statistical Life for Age and Cohort Effects,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3):573–581.Google Scholar

  • Avalere Health (2016) VA National Formulary Covers 16 Percent Fewer Top Prescription Drugs than Medicare Part D Plans 2015 [cited February 10 2016]. Available from http://avalere.com/expertise/managed-care/insights/a-recent-avalere-analysis-found-that-the-va-national-formulary-covers-fewer.

  • Baker, D. (2013) Reducing Waste with an Efficient Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.Google Scholar

  • Cockburn, I. M., J. O. Lanjouw and M. Schankerman (2014) Patents and the Global Diffusion of New Drugs. London, UK.Google Scholar

  • Congressional Budget Office (2005) Prices for Brand-Name Drugs Under Selected Federal Programs. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Congressional Budget Office (2015) March 2015 Medicare Baseline. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Coulam, R. F., R. D. Feldman and B. E. Dowd (2011) “Competitive Pricing and the Challenge of Cost Control in Medicare,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 36(4):649–689.Google Scholar

  • Cutler, D. (2007) The Lifetime Costs and Benefits of Medical Technology. Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

  • D’Angelo, Greg (2016) The VA Drug Pricing Model: What Senators Should Know. The Heritage Foundation 2007 [cited April 11 2016]. Available from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2007/04/the-va-drug-pricing-model-what-senators-should-know.

  • Danzon, P. M. and J. D. Ketcham (2004) “Reference Pricing of Pharmaceuticals for Medicare: Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands, and New Zealand,” Forum for Health Economics and Policy, 7(1):1–56.Google Scholar

  • DiMasi, J. A. and H. G. Grabowski (2007) “The Cost of Biopharmaceutical R&D: Is Biotech Different?,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(4–5):469–479.Google Scholar

  • Dismuke, Clara E. and Leonard E. Egede (2013) “Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program: Benefits, Unintended Consequences and Impact on Health Disparities,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(7):860–861.Google Scholar

  • Eber, M. R., D. P. Goldman, D. N. Lakdawalla, T. J. Philipson, D. Pritchard, M. Huesch, N. Summers, M. T. Linthicum, J. Sullivan and R. W. Dubois (2015) “Clinical Evidence Inputs to Comparative Effectiveness Research Could Impact the Development of Novel Treatments,” Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 4(3):203–213.Google Scholar

  • Eger, S. and J. C. Mahlich (2014) “Pharmaceutical Regulation in Europe and its Impact on Corporate R&D,” Health Economics Review, 4:23.Google Scholar

  • Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2016) Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Medical Care. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2016 [cited April 26 2016]. Available from https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CPIMEDSL.

  • Filson, D. (2012) “A Markov-perfect Equilibrium Model of the Impacts of Price Controls on the Performance of the Pharmaceutical Industry,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(1):110–138.Google Scholar

  • Frakt, A. B., S. D. Pizer and R. Feldman (2012) “Should Medicare Adopt the Veterans Health Administration Formulary?” Health Economics, 21(5):485–495.Google Scholar

  • Gagnon, M.A. and S. Wolfe (2015) Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Medicare Part D Pays Needlessly High Brand-Name Drug Prices Compared with Other OECD Countries and with U.S. Government Programs Ottowa, ON: Carleton University.Google Scholar

  • Gellad, W. F., S. Schneeweiss, P. Brawarsky, S. Lipsitz and J. S. Haas (2008) “What if the Federal Government Negotiated Pharmaceutical Prices for Seniors? An Estimate of National Savings,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(9):1435–1440.Google Scholar

  • Giaccotto, C., R. E. Santerre and J. A. Vernon (2005) “Drug Prices and Research and Development Investment Behavior in the Pharmaceutical Industry,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(1):195–214.Google Scholar

  • Goldman, D. P., D. N. Lakdawalla, J. D. Malkin, J. Romley and T. J. Philipson (2011) “The Benefits from Giving Makers of Conventional ‘Small Molecule’ Drugs Longer Exclusivity over Clinical Trial Data,” Health Affairs, 30(1):84–90.Google Scholar

  • Golec, J. H. and J. A. Vernon (2006) European Pharmaceutical Price Regulation, Firm Profability, and R&D Spending. Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

  • Grossmann, V. (2013) “Do Cost-Sharing and Entry Deregulation Curb Pharmaceutical Innovation?” Journal of Health Economics, 32(5):881–894.Google Scholar

  • IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics (2015) Medicines Use and Spending Shifts: A Review of the Use of Medicines in the U.S. in 2014. Pasipanny, NJ.Google Scholar

  • Jacobson, G. A., S.V. Panangala, and J. Hearne (2007) Pharmaceutical Costs: A Comparison of Departments of Veterans Affairs (VA), Medicaid, and Medicare Policies. U.S. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (2016) The Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefit 2013 [cited May 18 2016]. Available from http://kff.org/medicare/fact-sheet/the-medicare-prescription-drug-benefit-fact-sheet/.

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (2016) Searching for Savings in Medicare Drug Price Negotiations 2016 [cited February 11 2016]. Available from http://files.kff.org/attachment/issue-brief-searching-for-savings-in-medicare-drug-price-negotiations.

  • Lakdawalla, D. N., D. P. Goldman, P. C. Michaud, N. Sood, R. Lempert, Z. Cong, H. de Vries and I. Gutierrez (2009) “U.S. Pharmaceutical Policy in a Global Marketplace,” Health Affairs, 28(1):138–150.Google Scholar

  • Lambrelli, D. and O. O’Donnell (2011) “The Impotence of Price Controls: Failed Attempts to Constrain Pharmaceutical Expenditures in Greece,” Health Policy, 101(2):162–171.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, K. M. and R. H. Topel (2003) “The Economic Value of Medical Research,” In: (K. M. Murphy and R. H. Topel, eds.) Measuring the Gains from Medical Research: An Economic Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–73.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, K. M. and R. H. Topel (2006) “The Value of Health and Longevity,” Journal of Political Economy, 114(5):871–904.Google Scholar

  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (2012) PhRMA 2012 Industry Profile. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Pitts, P. J. and R. M. Goldberg (2015) Price vs. Value: The Story and the Rest of the Story. New York, NY: Center for Medicine in the Public Interest.Google Scholar

  • Poterba, J., S. Venti and D. A. Wise (2007) The Decline of Defined Benefit Retirement Plans and Asset Flows. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • Serebrov, M. (2014) “Biologic New Molecular Entities Approvals Are Nothing to Write Home About,” BioWorld, January 17. Accessed December 21, 2016. Available from http://www.bioworld.com/content/biologic-new-molecular-entities-approvals-are-nothingwrite-home-about-0.

  • Sood, N., H. de Vries, I. Gutierrez, D. N. Lakdawalla and D. P. Goldman (2009) “The Effect of Regulation on Pharmaceutical Revenues: Experience in Nineteen Countries,” Health Affairs, 28(1):125–137.Google Scholar

  • Stroupe, Kevin T., Bridget M. Smith, Timothy P. Hogan, Justin R. St. Andre, Walid F. Gellad, Saul Weiner, Todd A. Lee, Muriel Burk, Francesca Cunningham, John D. Piette, Thea J. Rogers, Zhiping Huo and Frances M. Weaver (2013) “Medication Acquisition across Systems of Care and Patient–Provider Communication among Older Veterans,” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 70(9):804–813.Google Scholar

  • The Board of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Insurance Trust Funds (2015) 2015 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Tuna, E., K. Atikeler and Z. Calýskan (2014) “Classification of Drugs Bringing from Abroad in Turkey According to Their ATC Codes,” Value in Health, 17(7):A788.Google Scholar

  • U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration (2004) Pharmaceutical Price Controls in OECD Countries: Implications for U.S. Consumers, Pricing, Research and Development, and Innovation. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (2016) Contractor-The Ins and Outs of Public Law 102-585 2015 [cited February 10 2016]. Available from http://www.fss.va.gov/faqs/publicLaw102585.asp.

  • U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (2014) Novel New Drugs 2013 Summary. Silverspring, MD: Center for Drug and Evaluation Research.Google Scholar

  • Vernon, J. A. 2005. “Examining the Link Between Price Regulation and Pharmaceutical R&D Investment,” Health Economics, 14(1):1–16.Google Scholar

  • Viscusi, W. K., and J. E. Aldy (2003) “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1):5–76.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-01-20


Citation Information: Forum for Health Economics and Policy, ISSN (Online) 1558-9544, ISSN (Print) 2194-6191, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2016-0011.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in