Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Fischer, Olga / Norde, Muriel

4 Issues per year


Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.324
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.616

CiteScore 2017: 0.55

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.349
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.093


Folia Linguistica Historica
IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.529
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.525

Online
ISSN
1614-7308
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 36, Issue 1

Issues

Pronoun innovation in Middle English

Rhona Alcorn
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, College of Humanities and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Dugald Stewart Building, 3 Charles Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, UK
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2015-0001

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the history of two little-known third-person pronouns – 3pl. acc. his and 3sg. fem. acc. his – attested only during Middle English. Competing theories of their origins are evaluated and a novel account is proposed. The paper highlights an important gap in our understanding of the history of English oblique pronouns and supplies the most comprehensive description yet published of the distribution of these innovative forms.

Keywords: Middle English; pronouns; innovation; variation; LAEME

References

  • Allen, Cynthia L. 2009. On the disappearance of genitive types in Middle English. In Monique Dufresne, Fernande Dupuis & Etleva Vocaj (eds.), Historical linguistics 2007: Selected papers from the 18th international conference on historical linguistics, 49–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Beal, Joan C. 2010. An introduction to regional Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • CoNE = Roger Lass, Margaret Laing, Rhona Alcorn & Keith Williamson (eds.), 2013–. A corpus of narrative etymologies from proto-Old English to early Middle English. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/CoNE/CoNE.html (accessed20 July 2015).

  • Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • eLALME. See LALME.

  • Fisiak, Jacek. 1968. A short grammar of Middle English. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

  • Fulk, Robert D. 2012. An introduction to Middle English. Peterborough, ON: Broadview.Google Scholar

  • Guest, Edwin. 1844. On English pronouns personal. Transaction of the Philological Society 1(25). 277–292.Google Scholar

  • Hickey, Raymond. 2004. Standard wisdoms and historical dialectology: The discrete use of historical regional corpora. In Marina Dossena & Roger Lass (eds.), Methods and data in English historical dialectology, 199–216. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Charles. 1988. Grammatical gender in English 950–1250. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

  • LAEME = Margaret Laing (ed.). 2008–. A linguistic atlas of early Middle English 1150–1325. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.html (accessed20 July 2015).

  • Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2014. On Middle English she, sho: A refurbished narrative. Folia Linguistica Historica 35. 1–41.Google Scholar

  • LALME = Angus McIntosh, Michael L. Samuels & Michael Benskin (eds.). 1986. A linguistic atlas of late Mediaeval English, 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. Online version (‘eLALME’) www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/elalme/elalme.html (accessed20 July 2015).

  • Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lass, Roger & Margaret Laing. 2013. The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: Unpacking the changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 93–114.Google Scholar

  • Law, Danny. 2009. Pronominal borrowing among the Maya. Diachronica 26(2). 214–252.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • MED = Hans Kurath, Sherman M. Kuhn & Robert E. Lewis (eds.). Middle English Dictionary 1956–2001. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/ (accessed20 July 2015).Google Scholar

  • Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Morris, Richard. 1866a. The dialect of Kent in the fourteenth century. Transactions of the Kent Archæological Society (Archæologia Cantiana) 6. 135–156.Google Scholar

  • Morris, Richard. 1866b. Dan Michel’s Ayenbite of Inwyt, or remorse of conscience. London: N. Trübner & Co. (EETS O.S. 23.).Google Scholar

  • Morsbach, Lorenz. 1897. Review of O.F. Emerson, The history of the English language. Anglia Beiblatt 7(11). 321–338.Google Scholar

  • Mossé, Fernand. 1952. A handbook of Middle English. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax, Part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, Hans F. 1981. Old English and the continental Germanic languages: A survey of morphological and phonological interrelations. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

  • OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online. http://www.oed.com/ (accessed20 July 2015).

  • Ogura, Michiko. 2010. Old English verbs with a genitive object: A doomed group? In Osamu Imahayashi, Yoshiyuki Nakao & Michiko Ogura (eds.), Aspects of the history of English language and literature, 55–71. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Investigations in sociohistorical linguistics: Stories of colonisation and contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Visser, Fredericus Th. 1966. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar

  • Werner, Otmar. 1991. The incorporation of Old Norse pronouns into Middle English: Suppletion by loan. In Per Sture Ureland & George Broderick (eds.), Language contact in the British Isles, 369–401. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English dialect dictionary, 7 vols. London: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar

  • Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth M. Wright. 1928. An elementary Middle English grammar, 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-10-31

Published in Print: 2015-11-01


Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 1–17, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2015-0001.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Patrick Stiles
Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik, 2017, Volume 77, Number 1-2, Page 410

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in