Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Fischer, Olga / Norde, Muriel

4 Issues per year

Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.312
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.578

CiteScore 2016: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.398
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.538

Folia Linguistica Historica
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.294
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.263

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Just Accepted


Cherchez la femme: Two Germanic suffixes, one etymology

Piotr Gąsiorowski
Published Online: 2017-11-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2017-0005


The origin of the Germanic suffixes forming occupational titles and agent nouns – masculine *-ārijaz (the ancestor of Modern English -er) and its feminine counterpart reflected in Old English as -estre and in Modern as -ster – is an old problem in Germanic historical morphology. The masculine “agentive” suffix, which occurs in all the subgroups of Germanic, is generally presumed to be of Latin origin, though it occurs mostly with native derivational bases even in the earliest attested Germanic languages; the latter is believed to be native, but has no accepted etymology, and its limited range of occurrence in Germanic remains unexplained. It will be argued that the two suffixes are etymologically connected in a hitherto unsuspected way, that the traditional opinion about the origin of *-ārijaz should be revised, and that both suffixes have interesting Indo-European cognates outside Germanic.

Keywords: Germanic derivational morphology; etymology; agent nouns; compounds; Proto-Germanic; Verner’s Law


  • Booij, Geert. 1999. The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Casaretto, Antje. 2004. Nominale Wortbildung der gotischen Sprache: Die Derivation der Substantive. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar

  • Davis, Garry. 1992. Old English -estre and PGmc. *-ārjaz: The origin and development of two agentive suffixes in Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 4. 103–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DOE=Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus (2009 release). Compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey, John Price Wilkin & Xin Xiang. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/ (accessed 20 October 2015).

  • Gary, Miller, D. 2006. Latin suffixal derivatives in English and their Indo-European Ancestry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gąsiorowski, Piotr. 2012. The Germanic reflexes of PIE *-sr- in the context of Verner’s Law. In Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead et al. (eds.), The sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics, 117–128. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

  • Gould, Stephen Jay & Elisabeth S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1). 4–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grönberg, Anna Gunnarsdotter. 2002. Masculine generics in current Icelandic. In Marlis Hellinger & Hadumod Bußmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. II. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Haig, Geoffrey & Öpengin. Ergin. 2015. Gender in Kurdish: Structural and socio-cultural dimensions. In Marlis Hellinger & Heiko Motschenbacher (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. IV. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Harðarson, Jón Axel. 2004. Nordische Personennamen vom Typ Einarr, Hróarr und Steinarr. In Astrid Van Nahl, Lennart Elmevik & Stefan Brink (eds.), Namenwelten. Orts- und Personennamen in historischer Sicht, 545–564. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter,.Google Scholar

  • Harðarson, Jón Axel. 2014. Das andere Wort für ‘Frau’ im Urindogermanischen. In Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds.), Studies on the collective and feminine in Indo-European from a diachronic and typological perspective, 23–54. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Hoffner, Harry A. & H. Craig Melchert. 2008. A grammar of the Hittite language. Part 1: Reference grammar. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

  • Jespersen, Otto. 1962 [1927]. A supposed feminine ending. In Selected writings of Otto Jespersen, 371–380. Tokyo: Senyo Publishing. [Originally published as: The ending ‘-ster’. Modern Language Review 22/2: 129–136.].Google Scholar

  • Kim, Ronald. 2005. Ossetic silæ/syl and the Indo-Iranian word for ‘female’. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 2(1). 123–168.Google Scholar

  • Kim, Ronald. 2009. Another look at Tocharian B ṣarya. Historische Sprachforschung 122. 111–117.Google Scholar

  • Kim, Ronald. 2014. A tale of two suffixes: *-h₂-, *-ih₂-, and the evolution of feminine gender in Indo-European”. In Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds.), Studies on the collective and feminine in Indo-European from a diachronic and typological perspective, 115–136. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Kluge, Friedrich. 1886. Nominale Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialecte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Kozianka, Maria. 2010. Loanwords in the Etymological Dictionary of Old High German. Unpublished paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Historical Lexicography and Lexicology, St Anne’s College, Oxford, 16–18 June 2010. Oxford University Research Archive. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:35ad4916-bb11-4351-9818-ff5857b84463 (accessed 20 October 2015).

  • Krahe, Hans. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. III, Wortbildungslehre, 7th edn. revised by Wolfgang Meid. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26(1). 79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, Pardee, Jr. 1972. Germanic word formation. In Frans Van Coetsem & Herbert L. Kufner (eds), Toward a grammar of Proto-Germanic, 211–238. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Meyer-Brügger, Michael. 2002. Indogermanische Sprachwissenchaft (8th edition, revised and expanded in cooperation with Matthias Fritz & Manfred Mayrhofer). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Norde, Muriel & Freek Van De Velde (eds). 2016. Exaptation and language change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, Alan J. 1986. Head and horn in Indo-European. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • OED=Oxford English Dictionary Online. (3rd edition, updated in September 2015). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/ (accessed 20 October 2015).

  • Peterson, Paul. 2013. An old problem in etymology revisited. The origin of Germanic nouns with the suffix -ster. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 70. 1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2013. The lady (almost) vanishes. In Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds), Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 240–254. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar

  • Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård. 1999 [1986]. A new rule of Indo-European accent: Greek τόρμος/κορμός; Germanic *waiþō/*skandō. In Selected papers on Indo-European linguistic: With a section on comparative Eskimo linguistics. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. [Originally published in APILKU (Arbejdspapirer udsendt af Institut for Lingvistik, Københavns Universitet) 5. 161–177].Google Scholar

  • Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (=A linguistic history of English, Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ringe, Don & Ann Taylor. 2014. The development of Old English (=A linguistic history of English, Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schaffner, Stefan. 2001. Das Vernersche Gesetz und der innerparadigmatische grammatische Wechsel des Urgermanischen im Nominalbereich. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar

  • Sihler, Andrew. 1977. The PIE origins of the Germanic feminine nomina agentis in *-stri(ō)n. Die Sprache 23. 36–48.Google Scholar

  • Stifter, David. 2010. The Proto-Germanic shift *ā>*ō and early Germanic linguistic contacts. Historische Sprachforschung 122. 268–283.Google Scholar

  • Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1986. Urgermanische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Wilhelm.Google Scholar

  • Wright, Thomas. 1884. Anglo-Saxon and Old English vocabularies, 2nd edn. revised by Richard Paul Wülcker. London: Trübner.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-11-10

Published in Print: 2017-11-27

Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, Volume 51, Issue s38, Pages 125–147, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2017-0005.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in