Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Fischer, Olga / Norde, Muriel

Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.463
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.647

CiteScore 2018: 0.59

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.284
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.971

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 40, Issue 1


Charting the rise and demise of a phonotactically motivated change in Scots

Warren Maguire / Rhona Alcorn / Benjamin Molineaux / Joanna Kopaczyk / Vasilios Karaiskos / Bettelou Los
Published Online: 2019-07-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2019-0003


Although Old English [f] and [v] are represented unambiguously in Older Scots orthography by <f> and <v> (or <u>) in initial and morpheme-internal position, in morpheme-final position <f> and <v>/<u> appear to be used interchangeably for both of these Old English sounds. As a result, there is often a mismatch between the spellings and the etymologically expected consonant. This paper explores these spellings using a substantial database of Older Scots texts, which have been grapho-phonologically parsed as part of the From Inglis to Scots (FITS) project. Three explanations are explored for this apparent mismatch: (1) it was a spelling-only change; (2) there was a near merger of /f/ and /v/ in Older Scots; (3) final [v] devoiced in (pre-)Older Scots but this has subsequently been reversed. A close analysis of the data suggests that the Old English phonotactic constraint against final voiced fricatives survived into the pre-Literary Scots period, leading to automatic devoicing of any fricative that appeared in word-final position (a version of Hypothesis 3), and this, interacting with final schwa loss, gave rise to the complex patterns of variation we see in the Older Scots data. Thus, the devoicing of [v] in final position was not just a phonetically natural sound change, but also one driven by a pre-existing phonotactic constraint in the language. This paper provides evidence for the active role of phonotactic constraints in the development of sound changes, suggesting that phonotactic constraints are not necessarily at the mercy of the changes which conflict with them, but can be involved in the direction of sound change themselves.

Keywords: corpus linguistics; fricative devoicing; Older Scots; orthography; phonotactics


  • Aitken, A. J. 1981. The Scottish vowel-length rule. In Michael Benskin & Michael Samuels (eds.), So meny people, longages and tonges: Philological essays in Scots and Medieval English presented to Angus Mcintosh, 131–157. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Aitken, A. J. & Caroline Macafee. 2002. The Older Scots vowels. Edinburgh: Scottish Text Society.Google Scholar

  • Alcorn, Rhona, Vasilis Karaiskos, Joanna Kopaczyk, Bettelou Los, Warren Maguire & Benjamin Molineaux. forthcoming. From Inglis to Scots: A corpus of grapho-phonological correspondences (1380–1500) with associated corpus of changes. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. http://www.amc.lel.ed.ac.uk/fits/.

  • Alcorn, Rhona, Benjamin Molineaux, Joanna Kopaczyk, Vasilios Karaiskos, Bettelou Los & Warren Maguire. 2017. The emergence of Scots: Clues from Germanic *a reflexes. In Janet Cruickshank & Robert McColl Millar (eds.), Before the storm: Papers from the forum for research on the languages of Scotland and Ulster triennial meeting, Ayr 2015, 1–32. Aberdeen: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ulster.Google Scholar

  • Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 1998. Prosodic optimization: The Middle English length adjustment. English Language and Linguistics 2(2). 167–197.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fisiak, Jacek. 1968. A short grammar of Middle English. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

  • Hock, Hans H. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Johnston, Paul. 1997. Older Scots phonology and its regional variation. In Charles Jones (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 47–111. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, Richard. 1934. Handbuch der mittelenglischen Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

  • King, Anne. 1997. The inflectional morphology of Older Scots. In Charles Jones (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 156–181. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 2003. The phonological basis of sound change. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 313–342. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Kopaczyk, Joanna, Benjamin Molineaux, Vasilios Karaiskos, Rhona Alcorn, Bettelou Los & Warren Maguire. 2018. Towards a grapho-phonologically parsed corpus of medieval Scots: Database design and technical solutions. Corpora 13(2). 255–269.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford and Cambridge (MA): Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2003. Tales of the 1001 nists: The phonological implications of litteral substitution sets in thirteenth-century south-west-Midland texts. English Language and Linguistics 7(2). 1–22.Google Scholar

  • Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. 2: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lass, Roger, Margaret Laing, Rhona Alcorn & Keith Williamson. 2013. A corpus of narrative etymologies from proto-Old English to Early Middle English and accompanying corpus of changes. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/CoNE/CoNE.html (accessed 21 February 2019).

  • Luick, Karl. 1940. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Maguire, Warren. 2012. English and Scots in Scotland. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Areal features of the Anglophone world, 53–77. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Maguire, Warren. 2015. The north above the North: Scotland and Northern English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Researching northern English, 437–457. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Maguire, Warren, Lynn Clark & Kevin Watson. 2013. Introduction: What are mergers and can they be reversed? In Lynn Clark, Kevin Watson & Warren Maguire (eds.), Phonological mergers in English. [Special issue]. English Language and Linguistics 17(2). 229–239.Google Scholar

  • Minkova, Donka. 1991. The history of final vowels in English: The sound of muting. (Topics in English Linguistics 4) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Minkova, Donka. 2011. Phonemically contrastive fricatives in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 15(1). 31–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Minkova, Donka. 2014. A historical phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mossé, Fernand. 1952. A handbook of Middle English. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ritt, Nikolaus. 2005. Quantity adjustment: Vowel lengthening and shortening in early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Daisy. 2018. Ye said lettrez: The orthographic representation of inflectional morphemes in Older Scots. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

  • Williamson, Keith. 2002. The dialectology of ‘English’ north of the Humber, c. 1380-1500. In Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds.), Sounds, words, texts and change: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, University of Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000, 253–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Williamson, Keith. 2008. A linguistic Atlas of Older Scots, phase 1: 1380–1500. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laos1/laos1.html (accessed 21 February 2019).

  • Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English dialect grammar. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar

  • Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth Wright. 1928. An elementary Middle English grammar, 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-05

Revised: 2018-12-03

Accepted: 2019-01-29

Published Online: 2019-07-28

Published in Print: 2019-07-26

Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 37–59, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2019-0003.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in