Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Fischer, Olga / Norde, Muriel


Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.463
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.647

CiteScore 2018: 0.59

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.284
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.971

Online
ISSN
1614-7308
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 48, Issue 2

Issues

Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words

Björn Wiemer
Published Online: 2014-11-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.015

Abstract

The article addresses structural aspects of language change which have been ascribed to grammaticalization and have tacitly been presupposed by diverse accounts (i) of the motives of complex changes, (ii) of the role of language contact, and (iii) by attempts to create areal profiles of language types and zones of convergence. We discuss some of the preconditions for a comprehensive and yet unified treatment of changes in which grammaticalization would not become an anythinggoes concept of grammatical change. Starting from a reconsideration of Lehmann’s parameters and their treatment in the literature, we first address problems connected to accounts based on prototypes (or checklists). Parameters belonging to the syntagmatic axis are analyzed in more detail. Even though parameters may be ranked within prototype-based approaches, such an approach is shown to be insufficient in articulating a coherent theory. An alternative might consist in the application of a superordinate principle based on relative discourse prominence (together with conventionalization). The advantages and drawbacks of both approaches are investigated, and it is argued that they should be employed as complementary parts of a coherent grammaticalization theory that is yet to be detailed.

Keywords: Grammaticalization; language change; prototype theory; areal clustering; syntactic tightening; conventionalized discursive secondariness

About the article

Received: 2013-06-24

Accepted: 2014-01-20

Published Online: 2014-11-21

Published in Print: 2014-10-01


Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 425–468, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.015.

Export Citation

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Gergana Popova
Studies in Language, 2017, Volume 41, Number 1
[2]
Bernd Heine, Heiko Narrog, and Haiping Long
Studies in Language, 2016, Volume 40, Number 1, Page 137

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in